One bedroom per person

Individuals shouldn’t allow themselves, or perhaps government shouldn’t allow them, to own a home with more than two bedrooms, one they sleep in and a spare one.
There’s no good reason why a single person should own more than two bedrooms.
If they have a family, then they should be allowed to own one more bedroom per child.
As far as charging rent goes, it shouldn’t exist, it’s exploitation.
The vast majority of people with very few exceptions, simply don’t need more than two bedrooms, it’s not a need, it’s a luxury, and people shouldn’t allow themselves, or be allowed, one of the two, to have much more than they need.

There are costs to individuals, their community, and nature.
The more people with more unoccupied rooms there are, the less space there is for everyone else, and the less room there is for nature.
Thousands of species have already died off due to man’s greed, and thousands more will die off in the near future, if we don’t begin cutting back on our excesses.
The diminishment of nature doesn’t just harm itself, it harms us, without nature we couldn’t survive, and so room must be left for it.
There are costs to individuals too, the more stuff someone has, the more they must work for it, and working hard to buy lots of things you don’t need and maintain them, is a mental illness, to risk what one needs for what one desires.

Having a home of some size is a need though, even foxes have their dens and birds their nests, but there’s no need for one person to live in a mansion all by himself, or use his other rooms to exploit people.

That sort of thinking doesn’t bode too well with a culture of entitlement and grandeur. :sunglasses:

Or, we could build higher and wider with more gaps and lots of transparency or semi transparency. Then everyone can have what they want – within reason. For a growing family [the reason why people buy houses with more rooms than they need], they can just add on extra layers on the top. That is where sloped roofs are bit useless, all they do is keep the rain out. You may as well have a flyer port up there with solar panels and a patio table ect. I don’t get what the point of putting a lid on their house is, nor why people want to be rooted to 2-dimensionality. You could start with 2 bedrooms and just build more on top as you need them. - wont work with tower blocks of course. But generally speaking I don’t see what’s wrong with having all what you require, and if you like having guests over you will need extra rooms, and that’s adding value to society.

We should lock up and contain people in large technological smart cities… :sunglasses:

Your thinking is on the right path, just too small.
Why should wealthy people get tax cuts to buy their
5th, 6th or even 7th vacation home? Ever look at a picture of
a wealthy person’s house? You always have a large number of cars
in front of it. I’ve heard of people like Teemu Salane, a hockey player
who owns 20 plus luxury cars. How does that help support humans into
the future? By them buying such wasteful items, they are part of the cult
who will end the human race… If we are to survive, we must take control
of such wasteful spending because it threatens, not only my personal future, but
everyone’s future including your children and their children… Freedom is great,
but freedom that threatens the human race cannot be allowed.
Just as guns are a personal freedom but guns threaten the stability
and safety of everyone in country, so we ban guns because they are a threat
to people’s safety. It is no different than having freedom of speech except
you can’t yell fire in a crowded movie theater, it threatens the safety of the
movie patrons. No different…

Kropotkin

Why is it you never hear the haves complaining? We have worked hard for these “luxuries” and they are ours. Now again here is another wanting to confiscate what we worked for just so they do not have to work. We and most of the people we know donate and help out when we can but, noooo not good enough we must give everything away to those too damn lazy to try new, move, learn, work. We are supposed to support all others… F*** off.
Nope not a republican or religious or anything else, just a person that worked, learned, tried, failed , tried more and earned. It is ours not yours. , get your own. We have 10 acres 9 of which is wilderness… You all get your own or give your own away. Don’t steal from others…

If the future is threaten, then you do what you must.
Any parent understand that…

Kropotkin

We live in an economic system, not in a moneyless utopia. If someone can afford 20 cars then they’re already supporting all the employees in those companies, paying taxes on those cars, and generally have a higher quality of life in material terms. The sales people at Mercedes make a lot of money, as well as the technicians, designers, manufacturers, parts makers, without a market for luxury cars all that work-labor would be relocated elsewhere.

Of course we have excess, capitalism is a system of excessiveness. Know what else is a system of excessiveness? Life. But life learns to moderate and channel its excess, and this is what humanity is also slowly learning how to do. The answer isn’t to oppose excess in principle but to get better at moderating and channeling it productivity and rationally.

We don’t need to ban people from owning more than one car or bedroom in order to fix poverty and homelessness, we simply would need political will to actually value addressing those issues. This is the major problem with excess as it currently stands, is that it leads to commodity fetishism and emotional burnout which depletes the possibility for forming a political will to address real human problems.

And if you’ve ever lived in a home with just one bedroom per person, basically a tiny house or apartment, especially with a roommate, then you know what kind of poor quality of life that entails. Humans need space, there is no value being scrunched up like sardines in the smallest possible living spaces, that is literally hell to most people. Lack of space like that translates directly into a host of psychological and social problems, which you can learn about if you look into problems of population density and urbanization.

The old and stupid way of thinking is “take from those who have, so everyone has equal (low) quality of the same stuff”. That is not a solution for humanity. It might work for termites or ants, but not for humans. Inequality, poverty, homelessness, relentless urbanization, and poor management of excess are all very real problems humanity faces; but we need to get more creative in how we think about them. Laws banning excess are like a plant evolving a hard sheath around itself preventing any new shoots and leaves from forming, severely restricting its own movement. Life simply doesn’t work like that.

The best way is to open up many new channels for excessive growth, new “frontiers” like in space, underwater, virtually online, mentally in learning and education access, emotionally through promotion of culture, all of this sort of thing gives material and immaterial outlets for excess to naturally arrive at more useful and manageable channels of release. And marginal increases in upper tax levels along with real political will could solve social ills of lack of education access, homelessness and starvation, if anyone really cares to do that, which no one really does. Ever wonder why?

Very well said.

It’s quite elementary everyone, the rich and wealthy will be allowed to keep their twenty acre Mcmansions while the unemployed or poor proles will be herded up like animals in deeply urbanized buildings that resemble a Japanese capsule hotel. Isn’t progress grand?

Those rooms are far too spacious.

Yeah, they should cut them down to size a bit more…:sunglasses:

No then you would be kept awake by the joker next door snoring or doing something.

If intelligent rational , people willingly live like that then that is all on them and no one else. Our ancestors walked to new lives in new territories, I guess that spirit is dead in many.

Should midgets have rooms sized to their height, and should government enforce this strict adherence?

I don’t think midgets need so much space above, if we institute these other changes, many will just build a second story in normal sized rooms, having more illicit bedrooms.

I don’t see a solution to stopping people from doing this sort or random, in the middle of the night searches of all houses and apartments to identify where midgets currently are living and having a illegal residential setup (they may tear it down if warn in advance), or we just need to kill all midgets.

It is the logical conclusion to this thread.

Midgets get to share a space and breed unlike others

A box of tissue, skin lotion, and three rented pornographic DVDs goes a long way some nights when traveling alone…

This is a recipe for a Midgetopia then?

(Who rents porn DVDs? That shit ain’t getting returned. I’m not touching it without gloves.)

I think Turd has said in the past something about liking homosexual pornographic midget Haitians. He would definitely have to pre order for that.

My video preferences in comparison to Turd’s male Haitian midget porn…

She is a bit too young for porn.