How good is this documentary? At RT it got a 100% fresh rating on 39 reviews.
If you start out knowing little or nothing about Fred A. Leuchter [like me] you think this is going to be a documentary about the death penality. That and the technology used to carry it out. But then you are wondering: where does the part about “the fall” of this guy come in? How does he go about that? And that’s when the film shifts gears. Not only across space but across time itself. We are taken back to death on a truly massive and monstrous scale. And once Leuchter stumbles into this it’s all she wrote. We shift from the technology of death to the ideology of genocide. And then to the denial of it.
Oddly enough what motivated Leuchter to get into the death business was his alleged humanitarian concern that executions were actually a form of state sanctioned torture. If capital punishment was to be the law of the land at least make it more “civilized”.
As for denying the Holocaust, many will surely be incensed that Leuchter and his ilk were even given the opportunity here to make their case at all. And I think it can even be argued that, when push comes to shove, Leuchter was given the last word. At the end, the arguments seemed to shift from examining the Holocaust to speculating on whether or not Leuchter might have been persecuted for the role he had played here.
IMDb
All of the states which bought one of Leuchter’s lethal injection machines have subsequently stopped using them because they were too difficult to operate and maintain.
at wiki: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Death: … uchter,_Jr.
capital punishment worldwide: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_cap … by_country
trailer: youtu.be/niBw8JakaFg
MR DEATH: THE RISE AND FALL OF FRED A. LEUCHTER [1999]
Directed by Errol Morris
[b]Leuchter: I became involved in the manufacture of execution equipment because I was concerned with the deplorable condition of the hardware that’s in most of the states’prisons, which generally results in torture prior to death.
…
Leuchter: The human body is not easy to destroy. It’s not easy to take a life humanely and painlessly, without doing a great deal of damage to the individual’s body. Excess current cooks the tissue. There have been occasions where a great amount of current has been applied and the meat will come off the executee’s body like meat coming off a cooked chicken.
…
Leuchter: The first jolt disrupts or destroys the individual’s central nervous system. Current is then applied for a time approaching one minute. The adrenaline is being driven out into the bloodstream. The second jolt now seizes the pacemaker a second time. There’s now no adrenaline left to restart the pacemaker. The person is dead. If the voltage does not exceed 2,000 volts throughout the execution, the individual’s pacemaker is not permanently seized. In some minutes later the individual’s heart restarts itself on its own and the person is now alive again. They would have to call all the witnesses back, strap the vegetable back into the chair and reelectrocute him.
…
Leuchter: I came into the execution field from a back-door standpoint, because I was very concerned about the humanitarian aspects of death by torture, similar to what happened in the state of Florida two years ago with Mr.Jesse Tafero, where they actually set the man’s head on fire. Once the chair broke in half in the state of New York, and the individual lay writhing on the floor of the death chamber crying for 35 or 40 minutes while the carpenters repaired the chair. They burnt the transformer up. Fortunately, due to the quick thinking of the prison electrician, they had some cable, they ran some wires over the prison wall and tapped into the outside power line…without the consent of the power company, but there was no objection later. They had one execution where the transformer caught on fire and blew up, and it occurred in such a sequence that all it did was knock the individual unconscious. He came out of it with no apparent brain damage, no problem. Six months later they repaired the electric chair and they did successfully execute him.
…
Leuchter: Many of the electric chairs were built by inmates and electricians who had no idea of what they were building. They took a picture of another state’s electric chair and made something that looked like it.
…
Leuchter: With electrocution, unconsciousness takes place in 1/240 th part of a second. Gas chamber, within three or four minutes. And with the gallows it doesn’t matter, because you’re being dropped almost immediately after being brought onto the scaffold. None of the procedures require that somebody lay on a gurney for 35 minutes looking at a ceiling.
…
Leuchter: As you’ve probably guessed by now, I am a proponent of capital punishment. Uh, I’m certainly not a proponent of capital torture.
…
Leuchter: Another thing that we do is, our electric chair contains a drip pan. All executees, during the execution, lose control of their bodily functions. They urinate and defecate in their pants, on their chair. This normally winds up on the chair and on the floor directly beneath the chair. This is a disgusting thing when it occurs. It’s a very inhumane thing to allow a person who’s being executed, a human being… who should be afforded the greatest dignity of all because he is losing his life-- It’s a disgusting and a degrading thing to allow him to defecate… and, quite frankly, piss on the floor.[/b]
Shifting the gear:
[b]Leuchter: Because of my expertise in the construction of execution equipment, I was asked to testify by the defense team of Mr. Ernst Zündel, a German national living in Canada for some 20 odd years who published a pamphlet.: “Did Six Million Really Die?”
…
Zundel: We can solve the mystery of the gas chambers…in Auschwitz and all these other places…if we find an American expert, because America is the only country that dispatches people with gas. You can’t open up the phone book and say “gas,” then “chamber,” then “experts,” and out come ten Fred Leuchters. No. There was nobody. Fred Leuchter was out only hope.
…
Robert Jan van Pelt: Zündel is on trial for publishing false history, for publishing books of Holocaust denial. He needs to prove that what others see as false history is true history. Fred Leuchter is their trump card. He will be the scientist who will reclaim from those ruins evidence that killing didn’t happen there.
…
Robert Jan van Pelt: Leuchter’s a victim of the myth of Sherlock Holmes. A crime has been committed. You go to the site of the crime and with a magnifying glass you find a hair or a speck of dust on the shoe. Leuchter thinks that is the way reality can be reconstructed. But he is no Sherlock Holmes. He doesn’t have the training. It was not that he brought any experience, the specific experience needed to look at ruined buildings. The only experience he had was design modifications for the Missouri gas chambers in Jacksonville.
…
Robert Jan van Pelt: Auschwitz is like the holy of holies. I prepared years to go there. And to have a fool come in, coming completely unprepared, it’s sacrilege. Somebody who walks into the holy of holies and doesn’t give a damn.
…
Leuchter: I expected to see facilities that could have been used as gas chambers. I expected to see areas that were explosion-proof. I expected to see areas that were leak-proof. There have to be holes in walls or areas where they had exhaust fans and pipes. There has to be something to remove the gas after it’s been put into the room. There has to be some kind of device to heat the chalk pellets and sublimate the gas to get it to go into the air. These things didn’t exist.
…
Robert Jan van Pelt: Auschwitz today is very, very different from the place it was during the war. Everything has changed three or four times since that camp operated as an extermination camp…If Leuchter had gone to the archives, if he had spent time in the archives he would have found evidence about ventilation systems, evidence about ways to introduce Zyklon B into these buildings, evidence of gas chambers, undressing rooms. But then, of course, I don’t think he knows German, so it wouldn’t have helped very much.
…
Robert Jan van Pelt: Leuchter has said a number of times that the place wasn’t touched. Just open your eyes. You realize that this is utter nonsense. Virtually every brick, which was located in in one place, has been relocated to another place. Where are all the bricks of the crematoria? It’s an interesting question. There’s some mountain of bricks in Crematorium Five, but for the rest there are no bricks. I think I know where they are. The real places to sample are the farmhouses to the west of the crematoria, the farmhouses where people are living, children are playing, dogs are barking. These were rebuilt after the war with bricks of the crematoria. This site has been turned inside-out. What was inside the camp is now outside the camp.
…
Leuchter: All of the forensic samples that I took were brought back to the United States and sent to a lab here in Massachusetts that was highly recommended. They were not told what the samples were or where they came from. They were told that they were materials that would be involved in a court case relative to an industrial accident and they should be prepared to testify and they should certify all of the samples. All of their tests came back. And they did several types of tests… to determine whether or not there was any hydrogen cyanide. They were negative. These facilities never saw any gas. For virtually 40-odd years I believed unquestionably that there were gas chambers at these concentration camps. When I found that there weren’t, my next question is, what do I do about it?
…
Shelly Shapiro: There is no slippery slope for Mr. Fred Leuchter. The man is an anti-Semite. There are hatemongers in this country, and he’s one of them. He handed over his entire life and reputation to the cause of spreading hatred. He didn’t stop. He kept on going. He could have gotten out at any time.[/b]
Does the gear shift again here? You decide:
[b]David Irving: He’s been destroyed as a human being. He’s had his marriage destroyed. He’s had his life destroyed. I frankly am surprised he didn’t go and commit suicide, jump under a train. He saw everything he had built up in his own quiet, humble way destroyed by these people he had never met, whom he had offended. All he did was take the bucket and spade and go over to Auschwitz and come back with the samples. And that was an act of criminal simplicity. He had no idea of what he was blundering into. He wasn’t putting his name on the line because he had no name. He came from nowhere, and he went back to nowhere.
…
Leuchter: Of course I’m not an anti-Semite. I have a lot of friends that are Jewish. I’ve lost Jewish friends, too, because of what’s happened. I bear no ill will to any Jews anyplace, whether they’re in the United States or abroad. I bear a great deal of ill will to those people that have come after me, those people who have persecuted and prosecuted me. But that’s got nothing to do with them being Jewish. That only has to do with the fact that they’ve been interfering… with my right to live, think, breathe and earn a living. As far as being a revisionist-- At this point, I’m not an official revisionist, but I guess I’m a reluctant revisionist. If my belief that there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek makes me a revisionist, then so be it. They’ve expressed their unquestioned intent of destroying me simply because I testified in Canada, not because I have any other affiliation with any anti-Semitic organization, not because I’m affiliated with any Nazi or neo-Nazi organization. I have no work. I haven’t sold a piece of equipment in almost three years. And I have no idea if this situation is gonna change.[/b]