Arminius, I thought Nietzscheans were supposed to be grounded in military strategy and tactics, and not be driven by such common delusional drivel? Cultural ressentiment that drives you into the camp of the delusional polemics of the perpetually defeated is a unwise move for a survivalist, much less an overman. The 20th century saw the defeat of alot of ideologies, largely Prussian made… and they died off for good reasons. They are congeling together like a homogeneous blob, trying to work out a shared storyline and viewpoint in opposition. Problem is, they are merely stratifying on a personality basis in terms of compatibility, and when they thus merge… the “Other”, the American Empire or NWO or Illuminati begins to replace ideologically in such people anything real or concrete. You feel resentment at loosing a Germany, for whatever reason, you identify with. However, this is a particularly unhealthy way to go about this, and is more likely to promote the emergence of a paranoid mental illness by nit picking at symptoms best left alone. Let this Communism-Marxist-Anarchist-Fascist-Nietzschean blob die. There is a line between being a idealist and delusional,.and you passed it in joining in with guys like Lev.
Yes, its actually easier than I claim FC. ISIS/ISIL is stuck in a landlocked position, its border into Syria, Turkey, and increasingly Iraq shut off, Kurds shut off themselves, Kuwait staying the hell out of this conflict… even a very low tier strategist can figure out the direction ISIS is dependent upon for supplies. Jordan and the Anbar, and limited access in Saudi Arabia. It requires alot of bribing, smuggling, and shifting of supply lines… which dwindles hard currency and tradable supplies. What did Sparta do to Athens at Decelea? Same principle, except the Iraqi are mobile heavy mech forces, with perhaps limited target airstrikes called in by us personal (never the Iraqi telling us where to bomb, can quickly lead to warcrimes if we just trust them without our own forward observers on the ground verifying).
Maliki is having issues, which should pass, but even if they dont and he gets replaced, ISIS still cornered, just dug in slightly better. I doubt they will win the hearts and minds of the locals with such heavy handed policing. It will get harder to hold day by day.
I said easier, but no one seems cognizant this has to do with much larger pressures than the Iraq war, or even the Sunni-Shiite divide. Exact same scenario has been popping up last 40 years across the region, from the Caucuses to Central Asia, like a very predictable ripple effect. I can date it to the Ottoman Empire’s last desperate attempt to save the empire by invading central asia in the early 20th century, and build a canal into the Caspian… which none of you know about, and believe off topic, but the underlining elasticity and shifting borders of regional states, from Arabia to Russia and Iran, date exactly here. Communism and the cold war froze it, it’s finally adjusting. It will continue to do so for some time, the youngest here will be old when if finally stops. Bush and the Iraq wars were predictable sideeffects of the state most central, much like Prussia, reacting to pressure from all sides then trying to fill an unexpected void. Saddam blundered in his statecraft, and reaped what he sowed. Any student if statecraft and strategy within the last few thousand years looking at it would of seen that, and not pitied him. Keeping him around as if he could keep things under wraps was delusional, and suppirts needlessly a genocidal tyrant without a eye to the greater peace… Saddam was already losing control over both the Sunni and Shiite, prior to 9-11. In most scenarios I have pondered, Iraq would be in similar to worst straits. In many ways, they are better off now, given Iraq can call in international assets now, under Saddam they couldnt.
I wouldnt recommend suppirting the Sunni or Shiite. The goal isnt the domination of Iraq of one side or another, but reinforcing a federal authority that can bridge the divide between islamic sects. This war isnt that original, the area controlled by ISIS is the same territories Rome/Byzantines would regularly take from Persia, and vice versa… every few years. Its tiresome how predictable is.
They present reasoned arguments, but their arguments coevolved to reinforce each others hate for over a thousand years… no point entering into it, or making sense of it. I lived there over a year, on the faultline… guarded the Shiite pilgrimage, its a whole lot of jibberjobble. Dont reject the arguments, but go around them… the tribal leaders are emotional and want recognition, “power”, and money. That is all. The people back the tribes, and live and die miserably for it. They support it because its all they have on every level of being… not just materially. Like I said, they spent the last thousand years figuring out how to find reason to hate one another… its literally entrenched in the lay of the land and population centers now… permanent antagonism.
That permanent antagonism is what always has, and continues to feed both sides antagonism. You fix this faultline, you quiet down the whole of Islam in three generations.
Its a very simple situation. Simple solution, try to buck up and avoid Monoamine Neurotransmitter depletion, especially Serotonin, for the next half year. Doing this last time lead to a premature pullout of Iraq. However, its easy to fix. Failure to do so means your children and grandchildren are doom to repeat these wars, same as if Bush never reacted to Sept. 11th. This was always coming, its here now, we are in a very smart position to wedge in a fix, lets do it. If its not us, then it will just be someone elsr doing it later, after even more needless bloodshed.
The other major faultline in Islam is the Pakistani-Indian border. Its not all as cheeky as Sanjay claims life is there. The wahabbi movement began there, side effect of the Moghul and British Empire, Dara Shihok’s failed regime in particular. Thats a whole different headache, but tge world will have to eventually force a resolution on if there is to be a international descalation of violence in our century. The India Pakistan crisis ripples to Mongolua, Tajikistan, and even Uzbekustan and Turkey in balancing Russia and China.
Books to read:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab%C5%AB … %ABn%C4%AB
amazon.com/gp/aw/d/014045513 … ot_redir=1
amazon.com/gp/aw/d/069112054 … mp_s_a_1_1
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siyasatnama
I also strongly suggest Obama offer Putin air transportation for any troops, supplies, or currency he can offer to Iraq. He has limited currency reserves, and his Ukraine war is financially costly. Hes just trying to see how Obama reacts. Russia has little actual interest in Iraq, by default. Its going to hurt them bad later on in the late 21st century when Russia is forced to contract away from Sunni lands it now holds.
Quit engaging in this silliness people. Military Strategy has been a branch of philosophy for thousands of years, dont act completely ignorant, and dont let your stupid side show in debates.