Feminism is obsolete

gib · May 13, 2016, 1:34am

Well, let’s put this in perspective. A lot of men see feminists as: 1) a bunch of ladies who hate men, and 2) a bunch of ladies vying for political power. Now when you put those two together, from a man’s perspective, you get a very scary picture indeed. It would be like a Jew today seeing another Third Reich on the horizon. Would you call him a pussy for feeling threatened?

James_S_Saint · May 13, 2016, 1:55am

Feminism in itself isn’t a threat. It is a corruption that leads to annihilation. The purpose of feminism is to destroy via selfishness (as are all “liberal” incentives).

The two party system:
) The Conservationists.
) The Corruptionists.

Guess which is which.

zinnat · May 13, 2016, 2:16am

Pandora:

zinnat:

As i have already mentioned, I am not talking about any physical hole, but only a virtual one, and in their minds only, not anywhere else.

Well, thank you. I certainly hoped it was not a physical hole that were discussing. And why in the world did I even give you an impression that I was referring to a physical hole, anyway?

In which way you asked what hole, that forced me to make myself clearer.

And, no man can ever make it to the top without having that hole.

What effing hole?? Can you rephrase it as something else so it makes more sense?

See, that was precisely the issue above. You already understand what i am talking about, but still asking What effing hole!

Closed minds either do not make it, or even if they do in some rare cases, you get people like Hitler and Ganges Khan.

You speak of closed minds here. So do you mean open mindedness when you refer to your hole?

Pandora, i do not think that was that much hard to understand, as you made it.

zinnat:

An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can create a hole in their intellect but without getting castrated; balancing of their egos, knowing when to penetrate intellectually but also knowing when to get penetrated intellectually by others.

For more clarification, it means that though a man should not always listen/follow/obey to others, but still have enough humbleness and patience (feminine qualities or a virtual hole in their intellect) to be able to do that when it is required.

with love,
sanjay

zinnat · May 13, 2016, 2:25am

mannequin:

zinnat:

Nothing is irreversible. After getting nuked, which philosopher predicted that Japan would revive so rapidly and so strongly!

Do not underestimate the human’s power to adapt and survive against all odds.

Though, it may or may not return exactly where it was prior to feminism, but ultimately evolve to something workable for both genders for sure.

But, such phenomena takes time to run through their full courses, which may be extended to some centuries too.

With love,
Sanjay

Yeah meanwhile, we have to do what we gotta do here, how have you dealt with all this?

Fortunately, in which part of the world i live, it is not that much big problem, but it is certainly surfacing slowly.

I’m not too sure im interested in something being workable for both genders, unless women enjoy be enslaved that is, right?..

That it is your problem, which i do not think can be solved, now or ever.

But the question is, zinnat, how are we going to return them to a form of sexual slavery and then justify it socially?

Again, as that is not going to happen ever, thus the need of the justification also would not arise ever.

With hate,
Mannequin.

with love,
sanjay

Pandora · May 13, 2016, 4:59pm

You were insinuating.
Insinuating without clarifying leads to ambiguity and confusion. I don’t really know what exactly you are trying to say, or whether you mean it in a positive or negative way. To me, a “hole” (in intellect) can mean a number of things: a weakness, a need, a lack, damage, etc. To me, a hole is a negative, but apparently, you choose to show it off to us as a positive, I.e., humbleness/patience. To me, you are still portraying it as damage, only sugar coating it.

Translation: An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can lobotomize themselves but not to the extent where they are lobotomized and castrated (even though the latter naturally follows the former); pretending to balance whatever’s left of their so-called egos by playing the back and forth penetration game in which everyone takes his turn of being equally penetrating and penetrated.

Are you proposing the practice of sincere humbleness and patience, or hypocrisy of?

Arminius · May 13, 2016, 11:14pm

These “they” are only a few, and they are men. A few men have won that game.

The winner have always been a few - a few men.

Have the citizens won? No.
Have the workers as the proletarians won? No.
Have the women won? No.

zinnat · May 14, 2016, 3:55am

Pandora:

zinnat:

And, no man can ever make it to the top without having that hole.

What effing hole?? Can you rephrase it as something else so it makes more sense?
See, that was precisely the issue above. You already understand what i am talking about, but still asking What effing hole!

You were insinuating.
Insinuating without clarifying leads to ambiguity and confusion. I don’t really know what exactly you are trying to say, or whether you mean it in a positive or negative way. To me, a “hole” (in intellect) can mean a number of things: a weakness, a need, a lack, damage, etc. To me, a hole is a negative, but apparently, you choose to show it off to us as a positive, I.e., humbleness/patience. To me, you are still portraying it as damage, only sugar coating it.

I was neither using that in any bad sense nor sugar coating it. It looks to me that perhaps you did not read that post of SM, to which i was replying. I was merely extending that very analogy what she put forth. That is only why i used similar terms.

I was using hole as an a metaphor for being able to absorb that incoming from others what is necessary or required.

zinnat:

An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can create a hole in their intellect but without getting castrated; balancing of their egos, knowing when to penetrate intellectually but also knowing when to get penetrated intellectually by others.

Translation: An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can lobotomize themselves but not to the extent where they are lobotomized and castrated (even though the latter naturally follows the former); pretending to balance whatever’s left of their so-called egos by playing the back and forth penetration game in which everyone takes his turn of being equally penetrating and penetrated.

Pandora, one can interpret anything in any way which one wants, but the previous context should be kept in the mind while interpretation. And, when you questioned, i gave clarification too.

zinnat:

For more clarification, it means that though a man should not always listen/follow/obey to others, but still have enough humbleness and patience (feminine qualities or a virtual hole in their intellect) to be able to do that when it is required.

Are you proposing the practice of sincere humbleness and patience, or hypocrisy of?

Of course, which all guanine humbleness and patience from the bottom of the heart, otherwise it would not serve any purpose.

with love,
sanjay

The_Eternal_Warrior · May 14, 2016, 10:57am

I do know that the women’s lib movement died simply because women preferred to be revered rather than have equality. There will probably always be things that women can get that men can’t, just for having a pussy.

Mictlantecuhtli · May 14, 2016, 9:52pm

Remember, in a consumerist society reproduction or pussy is a commodity.

The_Eternal_Warrior · May 15, 2016, 12:52am

Old matriarchies are wont to reemerge in the world. Many men don’t realize that women have ruled the world for just as much of history as men. With more men than women in the world its a buyers market and we’re the meat product of a world bent on vegan lifestylism.

Mictlantecuhtli · May 15, 2016, 2:06pm

The reaction of a totalitarian feminist state almost guarantees a re-emergence of patriarchy and it won’t be a non-violent one either as political feminism intensifies. Do you honestly think men are just going to sit idly by taking it up their collective asses without the slightest reaction or response?

When men become frustrated or oppressed our reactionary activities include revolution, war, radicalization, violence, and discord. Men are never satisfied with idleness or being oppressed for very long where unlike women we don’t protest with signs and lobby for rights under law. The intense reaction of men almost always ends up violence and bloodshed.

Feminists should realize what happens to women in times of civil war, total war, or complete collapse of societies.

But hey, don’t say we didn’t warn you beforehand…

Political feminism is playing a dangerous game worldwide and the eventual male backlash against it will be horrific. You reap what you sew.

The_Eternal_Warrior · May 15, 2016, 3:17pm

And yet, the male backlash has already occurred. Witch burnings, lack of equality in voting and wages, etc. If you think that women don’t have the right or that right doesn’t make might when might has made right too many faulty things, then I pity you.

Mictlantecuhtli · May 15, 2016, 11:04pm

Those are small historical incidences within a wider scope of history.

What I am talking about is massive global reactions on a much larger scale. Believe what you want.

The_Eternal_Warrior · May 15, 2016, 11:15pm

I believe that your vision is limited and this is a moot matter and concern.

Mictlantecuhtli · May 15, 2016, 11:26pm

Is it? Well, thank you for bringing it to my attention Mr. Smarty Pants.

Pandora · May 16, 2016, 9:10pm

Sounds like actual self-castration, without actually getting castrated. You cannot sincerely, or as you say, from the bottom of the heart suppress your masculinity without being castrated in some form, unless you’re being hypocritical/talking about 2 separate identities/egos.

Pandora · May 16, 2016, 10:01pm

What, jealous? You can now have a sex change (subsidized by Medicare) and get a pussy of your own and flaunt it to your heart’s content. And because perversion is the new trend, I’m sure you won’t have a problem of finding sugar daddies to support you and fawn over you.
Get your own pussy now and be the WOMAN you’ve always secretly wished you really were.

The_Eternal_Warrior · May 16, 2016, 10:52pm

Yes, but without a lifetime of being a woman or practising/embracing feminism, it wouldn’t get you to much further designation than glorified sex-toy.

Mictlantecuhtli · May 17, 2016, 5:11am

Pandora, read this below.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psyc … projection

Yeah, it sounds like you’re psychologically projecting onto me Pandora with these sort of insinuating mental fantasies of yours.

If anything I’ve always envisioned you as woman with a severe case of penis envy that sometimes when I talk to you I think I’m talking to a dude. It’s not too late sweetheart to get that operation and artificially grow a winkie for yourself…

Pandora · May 17, 2016, 7:09pm

Don’t worry, I am 100% woman to a real man, and I know real men.

You, on the other hand, have a long way to go:

Tell me what is the difference between a boy and a man?