I see that they have yet again changed the wording even from the last time I checked Wiki. Most of these cases are merely word games that amount to declared definitions rather than physical laws.
In all cases in which work is produced by the agency of heat, a quantity of heat is consumed which is proportional to the work done; and conversely, by the expenditure of an equal quantity of work an equal quantity of heat is produced.
This was an attempt to state a “conservation of energy” law as it would relate to heat and work. But it relies heavily on exactly how one defines both “heat” and “work”. They have a dubious relationship.
Heat can never pass from a colder to a warmer body without some other change, connected therewith, occurring at the same time.
Not true in all cases. James Maxwell proposed a theoretical case wherein this “Law” would be violated. It came to be known as “Maxwell’s Demon” (a “demon” because it casts doubt on their newly proposed monolithic god and religion). I, along with many others, have shown that this “law”, is very often not true, yet still proclaimed as a “LAW”. A few years ago on Wiki, and in many books from years ago, it had been reworded as a “tendency” yet remained as a “LAW” anyway. In effect it is like saying:
“Second Law of Agriculture: Healthy leaves are green.”
The entropy change associated with any condensed system undergoing a reversible isothermal process approaches zero as temperature approaches 0 K, where condensed system refers to liquids and solids.
This is another attempt to declare a definition relating entropy with zero temperature. The problem is that one can change the energy content (and thus the entropy) within a system (such as a crystal) without affecting its zero temperature state. Also energy can be taken out of such a system while the system remains at zero kelvin (again breaking the second law as heat/work rises from zero temperature).
If a body A, be in thermal equilibrium with two other bodies, B and C, then B and C are in thermal equilibrium with one another.
This is just a restatement of Aristotle’s “If A = B and B = C, then A = C”.
These were a part of the obvious attempt to know the absolute laws of God. It appears that they never really got it exactly right. And nothing is worse than to get such a thing only almost right. A great deal of power ends up being used to create a great deal of needless misery. It would “be great” as it would apply to many fields of science, except that it was never quite right.
Another thing concerning the apparent worship of these laws (rather than merely scientific honesty) is that they propose Entropy to be the most fundamental law of the universe, ie “God”. In effect, they deny anti-entropy entirely. They are a worship of a Devil-god, Shiva, while denying any Savior-god, Vishnu. Again, expressing the antithesis of Jesus (aka “AntiChrist”).
Above it all, the upper insiders drive the “stock-market” (efforts of Man) up while investing in futures and then at a pre-chosen time, driving the market down while investing in put-options, thus increasing their wealth and power in both cases. They thrive off of the confusion and futile struggles of Man.