Daemonic ☯

For the sake of not receiving another warning ( the gods know I don’t need anymore racked on me…), I will avoid the use of the proverbial epithet that begins with the letter ’ N ', and instead use a softer term: " Wiggerization ". What is a " wigger " ? A wigger is a Caucasian, who thinks, acts, dresses, etc like a…well…you know ( That word that begins with an N). With the advent of the rapper ‘Eminem’, Western culture has been a hothouse for these wiggers. The typical W. sags his pants ridiculously low, mumbles his speech, talks obnoxiously loud and exaggerates his gesticulations to compliment his overall ridiculous appearance. The typical W. thinks that he is tough as nails, that he is ultra-masculine. But actually he is rather feminine; he possess no originality or individuality — his entire persona is the result of the trenchant influence of alterity, of the current ethos. " Monkey see - monkey do ". Whatever is perceived as being the most popular, the masses will conform to it, so they can fit in.

In this culture, the ideal W. is stupid. The more articulate you are, the more " White " you sound and, therefore less cool. Bastardizing the English language with ebonics – primal guttural noises – stupid drooling facial expressions – clothes that are too big – and music that sounds like something concocted by feral chimps banging pots and pans together in a kitchen are what’s considered to be fashionable these days.

^^^ See this retard above? This is Jimmy.

Remember kids, the more stupid you are, the more cool you will become! Don’t touch that goddamn apple! Bask in that circle of heavenly ignorance…yes…very good, very good… :evilfun:

I give you my full support, Erik.

=D>

I don’t think I’ve ever met a wigger face to face. Maybe saw one on the street but, due to not paying attention, forgot. Probably because there are few of them where I live compared to America (not that we don’t have our own stupid fads here). Comparison to monkeys is definitely befitting wiggers. I honestly have no idea how such people can take themselves seriously, I usually burst out laughing when I hear them on TV, music videos and such.

This is what we’re doing now guys? I mean holy shit.

I think you have a little bit of wig in you, mr r :evilfun:

Thanks…I guess.

That would be a ‘no-thanks’, Mr R.

Btw., I like the new avatar.

You can just call them black people :confusion-shrug:

Because not all black people are N., and it’s not something unique to Blacks; though they make up the majority. I’ve seen Whites, Asians, Hispanics, etc act like N. To be a N. is a state of mind, not a race — not according to my definition, anyways.



Erik, are you scared of other races?

No, I’m not; I’m of mixed descent myself ( Caucasian + Indigenous Latino ). I’m not a racial-phobe; I simply find the aesthetics of this sub-culture to be fucking insulting and tasteless.

How do you feel insulted?

Insulted, i.e., annoyed by how petty and ridiculous they act, dress, talk, etc. It’s a sub-culture that glorifies base animality and derides intellectualism.

I see.

We have that whole gang-culture thing going on here too… made up of differing ethnic groups too.

In the 1950s and 60s group culture was all about music; Teddy Boys, Mods, Rockers, Hippies, saude-heads.

It’s a regressive step that they are now more racialised.

Those days were about class divisions, now it’s about ethnic ones.

I love how the media capitalizes off the racial tensions in the West — sensationalizing and milking it for every last drop.

I see so many ridiculous comments on my Facebook page about how evil the White man is and how unfortunate the Black man is…

The sad thing is that these comments come from Caucasians, Caucasians who have drank, nay, been drowned in Leftist cool-aid.

Most of these liberals are simply self-righteous, pompous morons, who don’t even really care about the supposed down-trodden blacks.

Most of them are simply arrogant tartuffes, who like to be seen performing righteous deeds.

The only difference between a liberal and a conservative is that the first gets paid by checking the ‘yes’ box on new government policy bills and the second gets paid by checking the ‘no’ box. That, at the end of the day, is what they do or do not do. Everything else is inconsequential and very expensive for us tax payers. I could do five politicians jobs at once and still have time for tea.

None of those idiots are honest, have any idea what is better or worse, or really care about any voter. Of the two camps, the liberals are the more smarter (did I just say more smarter?), because they tell better lies and with greater skill. More machiavellian. Only liberals have to really win the hearts of voters; the conservative platform is already the default stance of the typical american mind. Less government is better… although they don’t know what that fully entails. These are those generations raised on the laymen conservative narrative. So, unless a person is really moved by a cause for government, they would vote republican naturally.

The rhetorical task is greater for liberals. The conservatives don’t have to explain anything. They just use the debt excuse over and over again (as if the the value of fiat capital means anything).

reminds me of riley bowen

in short a tard who wrote boring novels filled with fancy words and philosophy terms but was in actuality and practicality a parrot n a tard.