9.0 Quake in Japan Was Not.

[Gobbo]

This article is really good.

(NaturalNews) What if the alleged 9.0+ magnitude mega earthquake that was said to have hit off the coast of Japan back on March 11 never actually happened, and the resultant tsunami that destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant was actually a deliberate, false flag attack using nuclear weapons? Freelance journalist Jim Stone offers compelling evidence that the official story we have all been told concerning the disaster is a phony coverup for a concerted attack against Japan, possibly for offering to enrich uranium for Iran.

naturalnews.com/032692_Fukus … quake.html

The h2’s

The damage at Fukushima, and particularly at non-operational Reactor 4, could not have occurred simply from flooding or an earthquake

An actual 9.0+ mega-quake would have leveled the whole country of Japan

Cities and towns hit by tsunami appeared strangely unaware that it was even coming

[Calrid]

It depends where the epicentre is, and I read the link thanks for that. Some smaller Earthquakes cause more damage because of the nature of the geology and the proximity to major population sources. For example the Chile Earthquake of 9.6 or whatever it was happened to be close to a major population centre and certain geology that magnified its destructive power. The report whilst it has some interesting points (you should read the Independent article on the subject) does not show a great deal of knowledge of Earthquake phenomena. It is interesting though. And not all the points can be dismissed as , the truth though could be far more benign than a nuclear attack. A conspiracy maybe but you have to consider all the explanations.

independent.co.uk/news/world … 38819.html

[Gobbo]

I’ve considered a bunch of explanations.

Anyways I just read through that article. Looks to me like some ‘anonymous’ sources and testimonials about how the place was in poor condition. That has nothing to do with whether or not this was an attack as far as I can see. In fact, it could be further evidence towards my premise.

[Calrid]

@Authority Figure

I’ve considered a bunch of explanations.

Anyways I just read through that article. Looks to me like some ‘anonymous’ sources and testimonials about how the place was in poor condition. That has nothing to do with whether or not this was an attack as far as I can see. In fact, it could be further evidence towards my premise.

It could be I think a lot of people are asking questions about Fukushima, I’ll show you some New Scientist stuff tomorrow, that is also asking questions. At least you are open to the fact that there are many explanations, and as yet no one is quite sure what the hell is going on. If you have read into this you know the whole story is not the Japanese government story, we can quite agree that there is more to this than meets the eye. This is an actual conspiracy that bears investigation. We can both agree on that.

Not all conspiracies are bat fuck insane, there really are conspiracies out there that are true.

[Gobbo]

Yes this seems to be one close to the surface.