A Historical Narrative

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
1

The medieval age was largely agrarian, religious and elitist.

System 1: Feudalism

Society: Traditionalism
Government: Absolute Monarchy
Economics: Feudalism

The early modern age was transitional.

System 2 & 3: Capitalism

Society: Conservatism or Liberalism
Government: Limited Monarchy (Britannia) or Republicanism (America)
Economics: Agrarian Capitalism + slavery (the South) or Industrial Capitalism - slavery (the North)

The modern age is largely commercial, industrial, financial, secular and sometimes egalitarian.

For whatever reasons, natural, by design or some combination thereof, Capitalism (thesis) was on the ropes in the early 20th century.
The challengers:

System 4: Marxism (leftwing antithesis, emphasis on class, reverse classism, deemphasis on identity politics, anti-racism, sexism…)

Society: Progressivism
Government: Dictatorship
Economics: Socialism

System 5: Fascism (rightwing antithesis, white supremacism)

Society: Conservatism
Government: Dictatorship
Economics: Class Collaboration

System 6 & 7: Social Capitalism (synthesis)

Society: Liberalism or Progressivism
Government: Limited Monarchy (Britannia) or Republicanism (America)
Economics: Keynesianism (Labour and FDR) or Neoliberalism (Thatcher and Reagan)

From about 1922 to 1933, Capitalism (thesis) got replaced by Marxism (leftwing antithesis), Fascism (rightwing antithesis) and Social Capitalism (synthesis).
Fascism largely died in 1945 with the fall of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, Keynesianism in the 80s and Marxism in 1991 with the fall of the USSR.
For whatever reasons, natural, by design or some combination thereof, Neoliberalism appears to be on the ropes in the early 2020s.
The only thing I feel sure of is, Neoliberalism will soon be replaced, the question is, by what?

Here’re some possibilities:

System 8: Rightwing Populism (Visegrad Group, Putinism, Trumpism, Brexit, Salvini, Bolsonaro…)

System 9: Klaus Schwab’s 4th Industrial Revolution, Great Reset and ‘Stakeholder Capitalism’

System 10: NeoFascism (white separatism)

Society: Conservatism
Government: Dictatorship
Economics: Class Collaboration

System 11: NeoMarxism (deemphasis on class, anti-classism, emphasis on identity politics, reverse racism, sexism…)

Society: Progressivism
Government: Dictatorship
Economics: Socialism

Or Anarcho-Tyranny

Or Steel/Plastic Age Collapse

All (good) things come to an end.
Will Rightwing Populism, ‘Stakeholder Capitalism’ and/or something else ‘save’ Capitalism and/or will it be replaced by NeoFascism, NeoMarxism and/or something else, albeit authoritarian?
Or, are we heading for Anarcho-Tyranny and/or Steel/Plastic Age Collapse, like the Bronze Age Collapse?
These’re the sorts of questions on my mind.

New frontiers like the Mediterranean sea in antiquity or the ocean in modernity can lead away from feudalism and traditionalism to capitalism (or distributism?) and liberalism.
However, eventually the socioeconomy is largely consolidated by wealthy and powerful merchants, industrialists, financiers, government or a combination thereof, or it collapses.
What sort of consolidation, or collapse will we have, or can they be delayed, and if so how and for how long, decades, centuries?

An aside: shortly after the fall of fascism there was little-no fiscal or social conservatism in the west, just as there was little-no fiscal or social progressivism in the 19th century.
Crony, or uncorrupt capitalism and liberalism aren’t conservatism.
Neoconservatism barely qualifies as conservatism if at all.

2

7 Alternatives to the diminishing Global Neoliberal World Order:

  1. Rightwing Populism:

Society: National Conservatism
Government: Limited Monarchy or Republicanism
Economics: National Neoliberalism if you will

  1. Leftwing Populism (think 2016 Bernie, Tulsi and Yang, not sure about Spain’s Podemos, Italy’s 5* and Greece’s SYRIZA, I think the Greens are on board with the Great Reset, so are shitlibs and neocons for that matter):

Society: National Liberalism
Government: Limited Monarchy or Republicanism
Economics: National Keynesianism if you will

  1. Anal Schwab’s Great Reset (revolutionary class war by the richest 1-0.01% on the poorest 99-99.99%):

Society: Progressivism (allopathy, depopulation, scientism and transhumanism, globalism, aracialism and asexualism, mass surveillance, mind and gun control, permanent emergency and martial law)
Government: Corporatocracy & Technocracy
Economics: Pseudosocial hyper-crony capitalism short-term, Neofeudalism long

Lots of socioeconomic liberty and welfare for the 1-0.01%, little socioeconomic liberty and welfare for the 99-99.99%.

  1. NeoFascism:

Society: White Separatism
Government: Dictatorship
Economics: Class Collaboration

  1. NeoMarxism (revolutionary race war by nonwhites and their ‘allies’ (useful idiots) on whites):

Society: White Genocide
Government: Dictatorship
Economics: Socialism

  1. Anarcho-Tyranny (think Portland Oregon x10-100 or Subsaharan Africa)

  2. Steel/Plastic Age Collapse (think post-apocalypse, mass coronal ejection, super volcano, WW3)

3

Corporatism?

Neo-Marxism, Neo-Feudalism, where Corporate powers (more power than many countries, censored President Trump and got away with it) establish themselves as the De Facto “New World Order”.

Davos Group, IMF, World Economic Forum, Karl Schwab, in conjunction with King Charles (coronated in secrecy) = Globalism (Corporatism) + Neo-Monarchism (Feudalism)

4

This’s an exaggeration.
The Anglosphere was societally national conservative-liberal (right leaning) until about 1965 (see 1965’s immigration act), thereafter becoming increasingly societally global liberal-progressive (left leaning).
The Anglosphere was economically national Keynesian from the 1920s and 30s until the 1980s, thereafter becoming increasingly global neoliberal.

System 6 & 7

Society: National Conservative-Liberal/Global Liberal-Progressive
Government: Limited Monarchy (Britannia)/Republicanism (America)
Economics: National Keynesianism/Global Neoliberalism

5

Yea, corporatism, and also corporations going green and woke, attempting to impose political, medical and environmental correctness on their workers and consumers.

I tend to separate Stakeholder Capitalism from NeoMarxism, but there appears to be some overlap.
Fiscally in Stakeholder Capitalism most of the economy would be privatized, but rigged, with lots of deregulation and welfare for big business and little deregulation and welfare for small businesses, lots of corporate welfare, but little social welfare, like the way it is today, but x10, so the vast majority of people are either renters, or homeless, sleeping in private, or state-owned homeless shelters, but not jobless.
Fiscally in NeoMarxism most or all of the economy would be state-owned, as it was in the USSR and Mao’s China, theoretically for the benefit of workers and consumers, but practically for the benefit of military and party leaders.

Stakeholder Capitalism is less antiwhite, as most Stakeholder Capitalists are white, and Jewish, whereas NeoMarxism is more antiwhite, perhaps culminating in white genocide should NeoMarxists come to power.
For Stakeholder Capitalists, identity politics is a means, a way to divide and rule the masses, whereas NeoMarxists are often more sincere in their hate for straight white men.

NeoMarxism is also less techy than Stakeholder Capitalism, for NeoMarxists often view science, tech, industry and finance as extensions of whiteness.
NeoMarxists embrace nonwhite and womanly ways of thinking and living.

Demographically NeoMarxists are racially diverse, many are underclass, proletariat or downwardly mobile middleclass (think Antifa and BLM), whereas Stakeholder Capitalists are predominantly white, Jewish and either overclass or their PMC (professional managerial class) representatives.

6

Stakeholder Capitalists wear many masks, today NeoMarxism is their preferred mask, but a decade or two ago it was Neoconservatism.
Ultimately Stakeholder Capitalists care about money and turning the masses into sheep they can better manage, and cull when need be.
They feel threatened by Rightwing Populism, so they made a temporary alliance with the radical left.
They’re Machiavellian, opportunistic.
They control both the shitlib (mainstream) left and the neocon (mainstream) right.

7

Additionally in Stakeholder Capitalism the negative rights of the over, and upper class are defended more than the negative rights of the working, and middle class, like how the rich and powerful often get away with theft, rape and murder Scott free.

8

In Stakeholder Capitalism it’s unduly easy for the upperclass to start small, artisan businesses and unduly difficult for the working and middleclass.

9

Stakeholder Capitalism: forced austerity for the bottom 99%; ‘eat your bugs and soylent green peasant, it’s for the earth’.

10

Basically, the Great Reset is corporatism on steroids by pretending to be its opposite.
It’s corporations and the corporatocracy going green and woke (NeoMarxist), imposing environmental, medical and political correctness, not to help the masses, but to control and cull them, fleece and milk even more of their wealth.
Historically corporations and the corporatocracy put on a capitalist and liberal or conservative face, but knowing the dollar is about to collapse and sensing the revolution is nigh, they’re leading the opposition, putting on a NeoMarxist face.
Corporations like corporatism, they don’t like capitalism and liberalism, conservatism and they fear Marxism.
Yea, they fear a grassroots Marxist uprising that’ll kill em all and take all their wealth.
This’s not to say Robin Hood is necessarily a force for good, Robin Hood will kill the king and take his gold, but he may not share it with the rest of Nottingham, in fact he may steal the rest of Nottingham’s wealth too, but nonetheless the corporations fear him and his merry men, so they’ve disguised themselves as them.
The Great Reset is Corporate Marxism, selective NeoMarxism, applying it only when it benefits them.
They’ll rob the middleclass, giving a bit to the poor while keeping most for themselves.
They’ll sow discord between the races and sexes.
They’ll impose environmental and medical correctness on us but not themselves.
It’s class war waged by the patricians against the plebs masquerading as class war waged by the plebs against the patricians.

11

Class warfare waged by the richest and most powerful always has to masquerade as something else, even its opposite, hence the cognitive dissonance between who they are and what they say, and what they do.

12

So yea, the Great Reset isn’t NeoMarxism, but uses it.
It will continue to use capitalism, liberalism and conservatism too.
And so the neoliberal era is coming to a close, what will replace it?
Right or leftwing populism, the Great Reset, genuine NeoMarxism, neofascism, something else?

13

Currently the Globalists / Davos Group is winning by a large margin.
They will continue their plans and operations until they are violently rebuked.
This means months and years more of “lockdown” after lockdown, new “variants”, “boosters”,
Every 6 months, then 4 months, then 2, then monthly.

They want to push and push and push to see the resistance form.
They are observing every single step along the way.
They have counter-attacks prepared.
They can engage physical war at anytime.
They can sacrifice their pawns at anytime.
They can cut Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates loose at anytime.
Their pawns will die, but the rest of their minions and power will remain on the field.

Remember, they set themselves up in a win-win situation.
If no resistance forms, they can continue to push Marxist-Socialism and Neo-Feudalism, depriving all wealth.
If resistance forms, then USA can collapse completely, and they return as “the Good Guys” to “save” the day.

14

Everybody needs to prepare for the immediate future:

Do you or do you not, want to live in a world where every infant is injected,

And (they) dictate who lives and who dies? Where you have no Right to self-preservation?

This is the world they want to impose and realize, to Enslave the entire world.

People who do not wake up right now, will be lost. It will be too late.

This is a battle for Autonomy, Agency, and Free-Will – which the Global Elites seek to deprive.

15

STEVE FRANSSEN || THE PENDULUM IS GONE: ROUGHER TIMES AHEAD
bitchute.com/video/3HmBeTksHPwo/

16

The Davos men, and women, the global corporatists are the elite, the establishment.
They’re the successful, they profited the most off the free market materially.
They got control of the free market, made it unfree, crony and corporatist.
When they put on a conservative face we call them neocons, a liberal face shitlibs, a progressive face, I don’t know, neoprogs, shitprogs?
What’s changed is they’re kicking it into high gear, becoming even more crony, corporatist and authoritarian, and they’re using the left to accomplish this.
The carbon rationing, forced austerity, the ‘vaxxines’ (mutagen), it’s not about our health or even the earth, so much as it is about controlling, culling and impoverishing the masses, buying up the real estate we’re losing.
The pLandemic lead to the largest transfer of wealth from the 99.9% to the 0.01% in unrevised history.
They don’t need as many of us now, they’re developing Ai, the space on the earth is finite and terraforming Mars, if it’s even possible, is at least centuries if not millennia away.
They’re going in for the kill, genocide.
They’re doing away with liberal norms; free speech, self-defense, due process and democracy are being jettisoned.
They want a new antisocial contract.

[b]3. Anal Schwab’s Great Reset (revolutionary class war by the richest 1-0.01% on the poorest 99-99.99%):

Society: Allopathy, depopulation, scientism and transhumanism, globalism, aracialism and asexualism, mass surveillance, mind and gun control, permanent emergency and martial law
Government: Corporatocracy & Technocracy
Economics: Pseudosocial hyper-crony capitalism short-term, Neofeudalism long

Lots of socioeconomic liberty and welfare for the 1-0.01%, little socioeconomic liberty and welfare for the 99-99.99%.[/b]

17

Yup

18

What is the core sociopolitical philosophy of the elite establishment, of Davos Man?
The part of it that doesn’t change over many decades?
Is it conservatism, capitalism, liberalism, socialism, progressivism?
I’d say none of the above.
The core features are authoritarianism, corporatism, globalism and scientism.
They just use conservatism, capitalism, liberalism, socialism, progressivism…
You could call them globalists, corporatists or global corporatists.

19

Conspiracy theorists, or rather conspiracy analysts, conspiracy journalists, conspiracy investigators, conspiracy researchers like Alex Jones are right to call them the globalists, but the corporatists is just as apt to me.

20

You could put corporate in front of factions of movements the corporatists have taken over, for example corporate conservative or corporate con for short, corporate dem, corporate lib, corporate progressive, corporate socialist, Corporate Marxist.
I’d say Corporate Marxism is fast becoming the dominant variant, Marxism Inc.
It’s funny what these guys are trying to get away with.