A Hologram's Existential Conundrum

Philosophy Forums Philosophy
1

I would first and foremost say, that the ability to bleed and to feel pain does not make someone human, natural or real. The definition of being “really alive” is not anthropocentric, and in-fact this world is mostly machine. This “physical world” is mostly machine and hologram. A machine can experience systemic stress (“pain”), fluids draining out of the mecha-structure (“bleed”), etc.

As usual this TV show is a game. The TV show is also a tautology because it is based on certain “baseless” foundations, and fabricated initial whole situations.

You’re a machine inside of a big machine, using a machine to interact with other machines.
Only a tiny part of yourself is ex-consciousness/life, a ground up and processed version, and your whole ideology, your ever thought feeling and view, is “false”. Your only improvement or evolution ever to occur comes from immitation.

That would be my “thoughts” on the matter.

2

Speceisism is allot like racism, though racism is like a sort of breedism or colorism, instead of a whole speciesism.
Each “ism” is an example of a human making destinctions up, making up classes, making an appeal to which part of the whole is better and which one is worse, etc. Such “bias” is also “descernment”. That means that an android’s life, for example, is less valuable than a human life, because of the differences between one and the other. One is made of different stuff, and has some behavioral differences. Same with races and species, one race has different DNA than the other one, one species has different form and function than the other, and eventually we get to the “human person” and the “inhumane animal”.