I am going to make some changes. I base them on some propositions I feel fully convinced of. Here are these propositions.
*There is insurmountable evidence for government conspiracy.
This is not to say that there is necessarily any astronomical conspiracy, that it is all malevolent, or that it is all under one single organization. It is the simple phrase itself that deceit and secrecy is intrinsic (at times quite blatant) within government.
*There is insurmountable evidence that various government groups do not have the best interest of humans or life universally.
They are interested in nations, in specific corporations, in conquest over international affairs. This is to be expected.
*Plagiarism is a great deal part of current and common affairs.
There are people lieing from just about any angle you might name. From an archaeological standpoint, from an astronomical standpoint, from a political standpoint, etc.
*“Know Thyself”
Out of the little that I may be apt to insist on, it makes the most sense to begin learning through self knowledge. If you don’t understand yourself, you are at much greater risk to misinterpret the rest of your environment. This does not need to support any mystical New Age claim. This is merely a fact of psychological wellness.
I have been hearing encouragement from all sorts of viewpoints. Mainly 3.
*Rebellion.
People that would go so far as to terrorize the WTO. I have always felt that modern money is not the answer to a comprehensive geopolitick. Competition brings innovation ONLY in a primitive sense. The “eat or be eaten” philosophy. Money is a good motivator. To assume that this (with a few restrictions) is the best all encompassing world ideology is ludicrous. We are SMARTER than this! But then if I would really believe this, why do I not try and build a nuclear bomb in my basement. Make myself a “one person country” or the likes of something crazy. Every powerful nation today was the rebellion of another powerful nation before it. They don’t seem so much better. Either something is corrupt about the human species which renders these “rebellions” to not provide much progress, or something is corrupting within the background which extinguishes the intentions of liberty seeking governments.
*Money
Likewise, there is the opposing view that even though we would like to destroy a great deal of capitalist notions that are quite blatantly corrupt, trying to work in any way “outside” the system is equally ludicrous, if not more, because of its futility. To accept a rather capitalistic view allows you to work with modern institutions, educate yourself, advance your access to things. There are socialist solutions being made. At times they seem a little ham-handed. But the theory goes that as long as democracy is ensured, then there is always a way “out” if things seem to go awry. The “Supreme Court” election of Bush, and the corporate puppetry, irregardless that Kerry won fair by far, made me cast doubt on the entire elective process in just about any government anywhere.
*New Age
So then there are the people coming out that would like us to ignore both sides of this “for or against” modern trend. They often reject scientiffic interpretation, or allow simple misunderstandings and intentional misdirection (generally for money) to lead them astray. The great pyramid scheme of hoaxers and hoaxed. Yet this does not change my strong belief that many agencies will stop at nothing to corrupt the foundation of science or to add religious bias to the sciences, in order to extend their arrogance or control the public. Most New Age believers do insist that the discovery begins with self. If they prefer to make bizarre claims, but do not set fierce doctrine, I can live with this.
I think these are the general 3 types of common thought in the general public. My reaction is “where to go.” To be intentional about it, not just wander.
Recently, I’ve been gaining more interest in the beliefs that try to shake the foundations of science rather than support it. But if the scientiffic principal remains pure, then this kind of attitude would only contribute more to science than reduce it. The strength of evidence will weigh out all the false claims and ridiculous doctrines that try to challenge it, which will add to the body of challenges which fail it. That is IF science remains pure, and there is no deceit.
And with that, I’m jumping into a little New Age wagon of my own make (or should I say my own meandering of bizarre misconceptions). I’ll be talking about following your intuition, about strange astral travel, e.t., about so much that normally I would call ABSOLUTE bullshit. This is the reason for the separation between profiles. Because my attitudes have not changed but the way I wish to challenge things for a time is going to.
As of this post, I’ll leave my current profile alone and post as PLEIADES.
This is because my posts are going to take a much more bizarre lean. My beliefs haven’t really changed. My angle will for now.
Support will be interesting, but I also hope to find a great deal of interesting opposition. How will you contend, against the New Age hippy? Will you be able to confront it with civillity, even when the suppositions seem ludicrous? Good luck.