Doubtless. But will they start at the top or the bottom?
Top of what. There are no shades or hierarchies to rape.
Downward Causation.
It’s meaningless. If every ground level pedophile is dismembered (literally), the system is dismembered (symbolically).
If the cost on the ground is too high, the strategy fails.
How would you locate all these ground level paedophiles?
We have one right here. There are many low hanging fruit.
Destroying an adult that has committed crimes against children is a natural and human thing. You don’t have to ask. You just have to release the latch.
Forget all the conspiracy shit. Life is simpler.
It’s a ‘strategy’ that’s backfiring though. They aren’t diluting the taboo, they are simply adding themselves to it. No one used to care if teenagers had sex. They always have and they always will, but those who had sex with them weren’t called ‘paedophiles’ until very recently. Good luck with that, men.
I don’t know if the ‘push’ has come from paedophiles or that other ‘phile’ that Promethean keeps bringing up. Makes no difference. The end result will be the same.
These philias have been around since the dawn of civilization, mate. It will always go on in moral fringe groups but never in society at large… just as it isn’t now. So, there is no need to worry. The stuff that does happen you can’t stop, and it’s not an open public epidemic.
“Rapers of children don’t ‘love’ children. ‘Hate’ would be far more accurate. 'Have contempt for”
I’m sorry, but this isn’t entirely true. I’ll give you two diaper snipers that have two different MOs. Robert Black was a pedo that loved the leetle girlz so much he couldn’t be without em. Murder was just a consequence of eliminating witnesses. If it wasn’t illegal to have sexy time with leetle girlz, ol’ Robby would be surrounded by em and prolly not kill nary one of em.
Now, the Wests (Rosemary 'n Fred) were the other side of that coin. They hated the childrens with a passion. Sadistic sexual punishers.
One type of diaper sniper covets the childrens and the other is mad at the childrens. The other one doesn’t want the childrens to like what they’re doing to em. Robby, on the other hand, would have been thrilled to death if the leetle girl broke out of her ties and, like Lil Kim rolled over and said, “yo Robby hit it from the back and smack dat ass.”
Floaters.
15 characters.
Fuck off until you stop writing ‘childrens’. It’s so fucking annoying.
And no one is EVER going to start using the word ‘ephebophile’, especially not dumb Americans, so get used to being lumped in with rapers of children-- and you only have other creeps like you to thank for that.
As an anarchist, i also try to spread linguistic chaos. Shock writing, mangling the language, overuse of slang and idiom, etc. Anything to make the experience unpleasant and/or over-the-top for my readers.
And I’m not abusing you guys either because I do this for science.
Are you too chickenshit to address me directly, @promethean75?
‘Ephebophile’ my arse. Only a child raper and hater of children could write the excrement that you just wrote.
Wut? What’d i do?! I was supposed to address you directly? If I was, I apologize for all truancy, sir.
Here’s an interesting short lecture/talk about sexual fetishes and paraphilias, he does mention pedos at around the 9:45 mark.
By this time it should be clear that I’m giving you all hell because you won’t shut the fuck up about me. Call it special forces psyops trolling.
I just found this one, haven’t watched it yet, but it probably has a lot of info that I’ve heard him talk about before regarding this topic. Not the race angle though, that is new.
In any case, enjoy ![]()
First: the subject was not pedophilia. It was the effect of words.
Second: Its the reverse. The emotional nature of the word is the very reason for people acting out.
Third: No. I would not trust anyone who is mellow about this. Problem is. Neither would i trust a person who reads 1 single word, goes into full blown brain damage because of it, and starts to talk about murdering anyone in sight.
As i said, pedophiles who ruin multiple lives because they cant control their urges and psychopaths who end multiple lives because they control their own runaway emotions are just two flavors of the exact same type of shit.
Neither are needed, both can meet the woodchipper for all i care.
Please see yourself out. I lost interest in your bs the moment you introduced that you cant read.
There is a difference between emotional and irrational. And then there is the flavor we have here which reads a single word and goes into dyslexia from the shock, having no idea what is being said but starts to foam at the mouth and throw around accusations.
I dont care how upset you are.
If you have responses like these to anything, you are right there on par with pedophiles who cant control their urges.
When was the last time anyone gave a single f about how upset you were before starting a school shooting spree? Because dont make a mistake. This is EXACTLY that level of insanity, and everyone can f off with the “im upset” narrative.
Gonna spell this out real slow: What you are doing is just a different version of what you are supposedly arguing against.
Hm. Gonna give this a read.
You should dude, but remember it mostly applies to hierarchies / tree structures. I personally think that reality is more like multi-dimensional causation and recursion.