The universe (the physical universe) is a brain. Objects are in it’s memory - it’s litteral memory. The tables amd chairs…those are it’s actual memory. It’s memory is litterally it’s memory. It is not representative memory, like our neurons which represent things. We exist, in it’s space. We are part of it’s consciousness, we are the movers in it’s brain, carrying out it’s deeds and it’s needs. We organize its brain, we move the objects. We are the consciousness of the universe’s brain, witnessing it’s memory, while we actively decide on how to shape it’s brain, while we ourselves are within and part of it’s brain. It’s brain tells us how to act and we tell it how to act, we are part of the universe and the universe is part of us, the only difference is that tables and chairs are unconscious and therefore not part of us (the movers) perspective other than “other” something outside of our bodies immediate influence.
This is the first half of the story the second half is that there can be no cosnciousness without a reader.
The human brain is just a network of neurons, there is no way that such neurons can transform themselves into actual spatial things, because they are not actual spatial things. Say one day you wanted to prove where solipism is real or not. How would you do it? You couldnt just sit and watch brains, youd need a device that would actually read consciousness and then give you a view of their minds eye, complete with a TV screen and speaker system. You would need a reader device to translate the neuronal activity into actual usable spatial output. So there are several possibilities, that there is a invisible reader device inside of us transferring information to a port and our consciousness is actually spatially located on another planet. But the bottom line is there needs to be some kind of mechanism to convert consciousness nuerons into actual readable output with spatial definition - a reader. And the transfer of information to the reader would be what we experience as ourselves.