A question to an honest (= Materialist) Atheist

Again, even if we are all the One, and we all think X, and X is irrefutable, then X still could be totally wrong.

This is obvious and already known to almost everyone. It’s not laughable that unlike you, I know how most people think.

Amazingly, we seem to be making progress this time. Age is a lot more coherent now and can more-or-less process what I write. Seems to be a lot less medicated than before.

Go Atla! [more characters]

LOL

What has your claim that when X is irrefutable, then X still could be totally wrong -

  1. Got anything to do with what I actually said and meant.

  2. Will you provide examples of when X is irrefutable, X can still be so-called ‘wrong’?

Is this irrefutable?

These people speak like they believe they are God, and that they know, for sure, the truth of things.

Okay. If this is what you would really love to believe is true, then, please, keep on believing it.

Yeah Age is panicking now. Still can’t justify the idea that the One knows the ABSOLUTE TRUTH.

This texts with 80% or more being quotes are boring

Why use a quote from before I wrote as “age”, and then say that I seem to be making progress, this time?

Why you a quote of mine, “before age”, and now say I am “a lot more coherent now” and that I can now more-or-less process what you write.

A lot of what you write now, is still as illogical and nonsensical as you were writing before “atla”.

Your “a lot less medicated” theory does not logically and rationally fit in here.

What is ‘it’, which is be believed that you two seem to be making progress on exactly, this time?

You two appear to be getting more confused, this time, than you two were previously.

By you failing absolutely, once again, to back up and support ‘your new claim’, which had absolutely nothing at all to do with what I actually said and wrote, shows the absolute Truth here.

Although it has absolutely nothing at all to do with what I said and meant, you still could not even provide just one example of some so-claimed, X is irrefutable, but can still be so-called wrong.

Which is clear sign of one who is Truly panicking.

It is Self-justified that when everyone is agreeing with and accepting X is irrefutable, then X is irrefutable.

Although ‘that’ is obviously Self-justified, it is ALSO justified by the very fact that there is absolutely no one who could refute it.

Let us see how you “squirm” your way out of this now “atla”.

Okay.

Did you answer the question -

Why you choose life?

By the way, quite a lot of ‘those quotes’ are just mine from other forums and from ages ago, which some people like to spread and share, as they assume that ‘those quotes’ of mine are somehow detrimental, to me.

Your house of cards is falling apart Age. You should have stayed medicated, because now that you finally ARE able to answer our clarifying questions, it is quickly revealed how stupid your theory is.

Who cares what limited humans agree on, and can or can’t refute? Humans aren’t omniscient. Reality could be infinitely more complex and surprising.

I told you from the start that all you’re doing is that you’re coming up with an omniscient One being, but you’re too stupid and dishonest to admit to it.

Can we stay, if not respectful, at least not outright insulting please?

1 Like

Okay. It is of no concern to me at all here.

So, in your last post, I was “making progress”, but “now” I should have “stayed medicated”.

By the way, I will again suggest that you do not jump to a conclusion, so quickly, based on absolutely nothing at all but your own assumptions and inferences.

I certainly do not. I also never even remotely mentioned anything about what you limited human beings agree on. nor about what you can or can’t refute.

But, obviously, you would have already concluded and are believing otherwise.

I absolutely agree with you.

If you ever come to understand Reality, you will also discover that Reality Itself is neither complex nor surprising at all.

If you were wrong, would you be smart enough and honest enough to admit it?

Or, to you, is it an impossibility that you could be wrong here?

Was this directed at me at all?

By the way, the more others try to insult me, the more I enjoy this.

Not directed at you. I mean obviously the rule also applies to you, but I don’t think i’ve seen you being explicitly insulting.

No, that is not what I assume or believe. I do not think showing those quotes of yours is detrimental to you. I think it’s most likely beneficial for two different reasons. But if you can prove your assumptions correct, let me know. I think it’s win win, as I said before.

I’m still surprised how easily Age revealed her core lie this time. Just like that. We never could get to it before.

Not sure at what age children realize that everyone knowing the same thing to be true doesn’t necessarily make it true. So we need to add an omniscient entity.

And what was the lie?

It’s in the quotes. If we all know the same thing then it is absolutely true.

I guess it’s convenient that Age is from the future and already knows which knowings 100% of humans will settle on.

I never said nor meant you did. So, what are you saying, “No”, to exactly?

If you do not think showing those quotes of mine is detrimental to me, then what are you showing my quotes for exactly?

What are the two different reasons you think showing those quotes of mine will most likely be beneficial?