And the A.I. technological revolution will just end up destroying the workforce into planned obsolescence.
When that occurs market consumerism will simply die off, how does economic capitalism even plan to extend economic growth after all of that? Hilarious stuff.
What do we do with all of the unemployed? Kill them all? UBI is socialist and communist as we’re always told.
You mean they went broke because Socialism is unproductive and suicidal?
You mean aside from it being basically the only significant market for China to sell its goods and services?
Yes. Indeed. Perfect isolation.
The reason China succeeds where Russia failed is that China is smart enough to know that the US is democratic, and if you sweet talk the idiots that vote instead of being all belligerent, it will be near impossible for its leaders to implement economic sanctions. The US cut itself off from Russia, and proved socialism is retarded by doing well while it went broke. While China, even though it as recently as ten years ago actually performed wholesale genocide, has managed to position itself as a subdued, smiling, well meaning, slightly proud and officious administrator, baffled by the US’s hard feelings.
The US is evil capitalism that doesn’t work compared to the correct socialist doctrine, but not a single socialist nation on Earth doesn’t live off of Sugar Daddy.
Interesting.
But socialism has never been about intellectual theory. It has always been about impotent rage.
It’s ironic, after the fall of Soviet Russia the Russian people have made all attempts to be capitalist and yet the United States will not stop acting belligerent towards them but continues to do business with communist China simultaneously. Make sense of that.
You know who is really unproductive? Superwealthy people, Wallstreet, and the Federal Reserve.
Yes, the United States off-shores all of its manufacturing or productive capacities to China with the expense and cost of bankrupting the entire American working class to an existence of absolute penury. But hey, at least it made Wallstreet very rich for a time.
And done well because of it. Within limits, because they didn’t completely de-socialize. But Russia does well.
Fixed it for you.
Right, which is why the countries they manage are always going broke and producing nothing.
Wait!
Deregulate the US. It will bring many if not most of those jobs back. Government arbitrage is the sole reason unproductive socialist slums like China are able to leech off of the US.
But at least it makes the Chinese productive. We get something back for all that steel dumping and other nefarious money-suction schemes that offer nothing to the world.
Call me Daddy.
Who controls and dominates the European Union? The United States.
They couldn’t even mount a proper resistance against the U.S. acquisition of Greenland.
You know what? Sure.
It means you’re right. The US controls the European Union.
They are the US’s bitches and do its bidding.
Like when Ukraine fires ballistic missiles inside of Russia utilizing United States precision guidance military satellites.
Everybody uses United States precision guidance military satellites. They are the best.
But obviously the real answer is that yes, during the Obama dark ages, the EU had full control of US policy making, and deployed a massive propaganda campaign to position themselves as good guys against evil Russia.
This is a toned down version of what they originally wanted (which was all-out war along the entire border), but Big Man has not been able to undo all of what was done then. The US has not been able to extricate itself from the retardation of a socialist regime that is probably worse than China.
I wonder if it would be possible to just, dump NATO.
It doesn’t have to be outright, there are a lot of things the US needs NATO for. But maybe a shift so vast that it amounts to dumping it in its current form.
Because one thing is clear: without the US, the EU loses that war in a year, and probably goes broke in three.
The war against Iran answers to US interests. But the war against Russia brings it nothing, and takes from it much. The only people who supposedly benefit are the EU (by benefit I don’t mean any kind of advantage for its people, but simply an expansion of political influence required by its expansionist socialist doctrine, by force of US arms).
Which should answer the question of why commies are always tearing their garments over war on the terrorists, but seem to be A-OK with US involvement in Eastern Europe.
The United States has consistently controlled all of Europe since the end of World War II.
It’s simple really, Moscow and Russia possesses natural resources. Brussels and most of western Europe does not.
(Russian oil, natural gas, rare earth minerals, and agricultural potash.)
Now, why would the E.U. a puppet of the United States want to take Russia out? It’s a real mystery.
The EU was formed to undermine NATO. The US never wanted anything past NATO to have influence in Europe, didn’t need it.
The EU is the Fourth Reich. In this new incarnation, they chose the suck-dick-to-get-cookies approach.
I don’t know which is more detestable.
The EU is the premier socialist power west of the Urals.
Like all socialist “powers,” it gets its real might by leeching it from the strong.