See I’m back for a whittle while.
So I decided to make this great post thead suchbjectubject.
It’s gunu be all about really KOOL philosopy and smarts,
even though most philosophers agree that people are actually not smart or right, in general.
But tahat doesn nopt mean that we cannot stil have a great big philosophcail idea.
Greeks mannaged to mix religion with philosophy.
Deities and astrology was assoicated with complex philosophical rhetoric and abstract classifications of meanings.
Different schools of philosophy had been persicuted before similar to how first century christians got tortured and burned and all of that. It was “spiritual”. All of the pythagorian, socratic, platonic, everything.
But there’s a grave issue from this, because of how much cultural influence religion always has, on philosophy!
Over-abstracting and over-dualizing, may be artistic and captivating to some, but it actually is somewhat similar to mysticism or the mystification of things my removing them above and outside of their actuality. All of the absolute truth can’t be known bullshit comes later so that people sit on a stump for 10 years being allot like the indescisive and mystical nirvana futuristic headlines kurzwiel news tabloid politician EVEYRTHING meant to catch your attention and make you imagine more later to add into it.
What was once literal like a stone or a tree, becomes a relativisitc perspective interpretation of something that somebody maybe maybe experienced, subjectively inside of their supposedly autistic and rapidly atrophising brain machine.
What this does is it makes knowledge and ideas meek.
It means your not allowed to have solid balls anymore, because that’s not rhetorically indirect enough or beurocratically appeasing the predisposed and secret red tape of a hidden authority, a cencor, not just that we must now be logical or rational, but that every thought be held back until it is properly indirect.
If I just said something valid in a few simple words, it wouldn’t have “philosophical value”, but if I wrote a whole book about something obvious that everyone knows, like about how we each have feelings and intentions, then it would be “philosophical” or “psychological”.
Never teach French people Kung-Fu.