A Syncretist Bible

I have often thought of compiling a “Syncretist Bible.”

I consider it a powerful idea, especially with a structure like Origins, Principles, and Narratives. This approach would guide readers through a diverse yet cohesive spiritual journey that honours multiple traditions and philosophical perspectives.

  1. Origins – This section would explore creation myths, cosmologies, and origin stories from various traditions, laying a foundation for understanding how different cultures and belief systems perceive the universe and humanity’s place within it. Including stories from indigenous traditions, ancient mythologies, and scientific perspectives on origins could foster a sense of shared wonder and interconnectedness. By showing both the diversity and commonalities in these “beginnings,” It would offer readers a rich starting point for contemplating existence and our relationship to the cosmos.

  2. Principles – This could serve as the ethical and philosophical core, bringing together universal values like compassion, justice, reciprocity, humility, and reverence for life. I could draw from sources like the Beatitudes, the Tao Te Ching, Buddhist precepts, indigenous teachings, and ecological ethics, showing how these ideas emerge across various traditions. Each principle could include reflections, teachings, or parables that illustrate the importance of these values, encouraging readers to internalize and apply them. This section would act as both a moral compass and an exploration of humanity’s highest aspirations.

  3. Narratives – Stories are perhaps the most transformative way to convey complex spiritual and ethical ideas, so including myths, parables, and historical figures who embody these principles would make this section especially engaging. Narratives from different cultures, including the lives of figures like Jesus, the Buddha, Krishna, or indigenous storytellers, could illustrate universal challenges and ideals in an accessible and memorable way. You could also include modern stories of individuals who exemplify compassion, resilience, and commitment to the common good, bridging ancient wisdom with contemporary relevance.

A Syncretist Bible with this structure would be a spiritual guide for those seeking a holistic, inclusive path—an antidote to rigid dogmatism and divisiveness. It could encourage readers to see beyond differences and embrace a worldview rooted in shared values and interconnectedness.

What do you think?

Let’s throw in a little soap opera and let the hero come back seemingly at the last minute totally unexpected. Cuz true story, and the syncretism is actually just general revelation.

The threat of syncretism

Much has been written from Christian perspectives warning about the “threat of syncretism”—the fear that blending beliefs dilutes or corrupts the purity of religious doctrines. This concern is often rooted in the idea that certain truths or revelations are unique and exclusive, and thus should remain uncontaminated by outside influences. However, comparatively little is written about the “threat of exclusivity,” even though an insistence on one “right” belief system has often led to exclusion, conflict, and a diminished capacity for mutual understanding. Exclusivity, especially in Abrahamic religions, can create an “us versus them” mindset, which historically has contributed to deep divisions and even violence.

Syncretism, on the other hand, has historically allowed people to find common ground and adapt teachings to local contexts. Many of the world’s spiritual traditions are products of syncretism, whether it’s Christianity’s early adaptation of Greco-Roman, Jewish, and Persian ideas, or the blend of Buddhism with indigenous beliefs in East Asia. Syncretism can foster adaptability, empathy, and a recognition of shared values, enabling people to embrace spiritual wisdom from various sources without feeling it’s a betrayal of their own traditions.

The threat of exclusivity

The “threat of exclusivity” can also impede personal spiritual growth by promoting rigidity. When religious systems are exclusive, they sometimes discourage questions, curiosity, and the integration of broader experiences, focusing instead on adherence to prescribed beliefs. For many, however, spirituality grows most vibrantly when it’s allowed to evolve and be enriched by diverse ideas and practices.

In today’s interconnected world, the flexibility and inclusivity of a syncretic approach can offer a path to spiritual resilience and harmony—values desperately needed. Rather than seeing syncretism as a threat, it might be seen as a means of building bridges and expanding the scope of spiritual understanding. By emphasizing shared values and exploring common ground, a syncretic worldview acknowledges the limitations of any one tradition to encompass all truths, instead promoting a spirituality that is both respectful of difference and deeply interconnected.

After a lifetime of experiences, most people naturally gather insights from a range of sources, blending beliefs and practices in ways that resonate with their unique journey. Each encounter—whether with a person, a text, or an idea—adds layers to one’s understanding, shaping a spiritual worldview that is less about strict adherence to a single tradition and more about an organic synthesis of what feels true and meaningful.

This personal syncretism often happens almost subconsciously. A person might hold onto certain childhood teachings, but life’s challenges and discoveries gradually add other layers—a favourite verse from one tradition, a meditation practice from another, a philosophy that offers comfort or clarity. For many, these accumulated elements don’t feel contradictory but rather like a tapestry that honours different facets of existence.

The spiritual journey is deeply personal. It’s shaped not only by belief but also by the emotional and intellectual resonance of each experience. And in a way, this openness to different perspectives becomes a kind of spiritual resilience. At 70 or 80 years on this planet, having lived through countless changes and challenges, the synthesis of various beliefs often reflects a person’s hard-won wisdom and compassion—an acknowledgment that truth can be vast, multifaceted, and beautifully complex.

If it’s also true, it’s just general revelation.

Don’t want to rehash:

I’ll just see myself out.

Goodbye

Put the physical sciences in there as course options and it looks a lot my undergraduate course work. Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is what’s valued. Values have inverted themselves over the course of civilization.Human sacrifice wasn’t always frowned upon.

1 Like

What you have described above, Bob, is basically what the Unitarian Universalists are doing. They left Christianity before our time. They deny having any kind of creed. Here’s their published platform for comparison:
Unitarian Universalism draws from our heritages of freedom, reason, hope, and courage, building on the foundation of love. We covenant, congregation-to-congregation and through our Association, to support and assist one another in our ministries.

Love is the power that holds us together and is at the center of our shared values. The values we share include all the following, which we hold as inseparable and deeply interconnected:

  • Interdependence: We honor the interdependent web of all existence and acknowledge our place in it.
  • Pluralism: We are all sacred beings, diverse in culture, experience, and theology.
  • Justice: We work to be diverse multicultural Beloved Communities where all feel welcome and can thrive.
  • Transformation: We adapt to the changing world.
  • Generosity: We cultivate a spirit of gratitude and hope.
  • Equity: We declare that every person is inherently worthy and has the right to flourish with dignity, love, and compassion.

Their practice includes but is in no way limited to zen meditation, Sufi dancing, music, dancing, prayer, celebratory gatherings, democratically elected leadership. Atheists are welcomed as-is. So are LGBTQ+ folks. How could the tent be wider? What could possibly be missing?

The controversy around the 2024 Olympics’ portrayal of Greek mythology in a manner reminiscent of da Vinci’s Last Supper reflects the ongoing fascination—and occasional friction—between these intertwined traditions. It also speaks to how art and cultural events can bring these ancient and theological connections into public debate.

One of the most provocative mysteries in the history of religion, the striking parallels between Jesus and Dionysus reveal why syncretism is a problem for Christians. The parallels between Dionysus and Jesus are indeed striking, particularly regarding themes of death and resurrection, communal meals (like the Eucharist), and miracles related to wine. The transformation of water into wine at the wedding in Cana, for example, evokes the god of wine and revelry. In early Christian texts, Jesus’s depiction as a figure who brings spiritual and physical renewal echoes Dionysian celebrations of life, ecstasy, and rebirth.

The idea that the Gospel narratives may have drawn from existing Greco-Roman myths challenges the unique, divine origin of the Christian message. Early Church Fathers like Justin Martyr and Clement of Alexandria were well aware of these resemblances and actively sought to refute any notion that Christianity borrowed from pagan traditions. Justin Martyr, for instance, argued that such similarities were distortions or pre-emptive deceptions planted by demons to confuse believers.

Dennis R. MacDonald, a classicist and New Testament scholar, has indeed proposed that the Gospel writers, particularly Luke and John, consciously or unconsciously used Greek literary sources to craft the narrative of Jesus. In his work, MacDonald explores how the Gospel of Luke, for instance, echoes themes and structures from Greek tragedies, particularly Euripides’ Bacchae. In this play, Dionysus is depicted as a god whose followers experience both ecstasy and judgment, themes mirrored in the accounts of Jesus’s ministry, miracles, and teachings about the kingdom of God.

The Gospel of John stands out for its use of rich, symbolic language, much of which can be seen as drawing from Dionysian motifs. The most striking example is Jesus’s miracle at the wedding in Cana, where he turns water into wine. This act not only signifies Jesus as a bringer of joy and spiritual abundance but also evokes Dionysus, the god of wine and festivity. Moreover, Jesus’s declaration of being the “true vine” (John 15:1) further blurs the line between him and the god of wine. The imagery of joy, abundance, and transformation central to Dionysian worship is repurposed to convey spiritual truths about Jesus.

It’s important to note that cultural borrowing and adaptation were common in the ancient world. Religious and philosophical ideas often intermingled, and authors frequently drew from familiar narratives to communicate new ideas effectively. The Gospel writers, aware of their Greco-Roman audience, might have used Dionysian imagery to make the message of Jesus more accessible and relatable. However, this does not necessarily diminish the originality of the Christian message; rather, it reflects the evangelists’ efforts to contextualize Jesus’s significance within a broader cultural framework.

The work of scholars like MacDonald invites a reconsideration of how we understand the origins of the Gospel narratives. For believers, the notion of Jesus as a figure with Dionysian traits can be either troubling or enriching, depending on one’s perspective. It challenges rigid boundaries between religious traditions and suggests that the figure of Jesus may be more universal and mythically resonant than previously thought.The connections between Jesus and Dionysus have long intrigued scholars and have been discussed in various contexts, especially regarding how early Christianity interacted with Greek culture and religious themes. The Dionysian associations in the Gospels and Paul’s writings suggest a strategic blending of traditions to resonate with Greek audiences.

Paul was highly educated and familiar with Greek culture, as seen in his writings and his approach when evangelizing in Greek cities. His use of Greek philosophical concepts, such as logos and soma, and his engagement with cultural references would have made Christianity more accessible to a Greco-Roman audience. The potential parallels between the judgment of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts and the ethical responsibilities of Plato’s Guardians underscore how Christian teachings could have been framed in ways that resonated with familiar philosophical ideas.

The influence of Greek philosophy, especially Platonism and Stoicism, is evident in the development of early Christian theology. Concepts like the immortality of the soul, the nature of divine justice, and the moral order of the universe were deeply rooted in Greek thought. Comparing narratives from the Bible with Platonic philosophy can reveal how Christian authors might have contextualized their stories to engage with prevailing cultural and intellectual norms.

A friend wrote to me after reading the syncretism article on Substack and said:

This is my reply:

The Ezra Institute is of course warning against a destructive tendency that, if they had paid attention, has been a long time coming, but the Christian dominion, with its ridiculous superstition, has always suggested that it would mean the end of civilisation. The amusing thing is that the more extreme Christian are the ones who are ushering the “end of days” in. There is no other way to explain the Christian right’s fanatical support of Israel. The non-dual traditions have seen history as more cyclical, with periods of destruction and rebuilding, of ignorance and spiritual awareness chasing each other.

This is also what Iain McGilchrist suggests in both the Master and the Emissary and The Matter with Things. The tides of time wash up LH-dominance and withdraw to RH-dominance according to some gravitational pull that is hard to discern. The fact that our narratives are no more than that, but no less, is in fact a liberating discovery which unites humanity. Someone told a delightful story of people sitting in ‘heaven’ telling stories of their very different journeys to their common destination.

Rather than denying ‘divine’ law, it simply has various names, whether Dharma, Tao, Logos, Maat (Ancient Egyptian), Rta (Vedic Tradition), Orlog (Norse Tradition), Nomos (Greek Tradition), Halakha (Jewish Tradition), Karma (Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism). These terms reflect the rich diversity in how cultures and traditions understand the idea of a higher law governing the moral and natural order. Of course, we can’t forget the Laws of Physics or Nature, which present a different perspective.

It is telling that even in that short quote, it is talking about the ‘normative structures, relationships and institutions’ that it sees assaulted, but I’m sure that oppressed minorities taken over by Christian missionaries, or modern-day Palestinians have a far better impression of how it feels to have their the ‘normative structures, relationships and institutions’ assaulted. It is people like the Ezra Institute that are ‘undercutting the possibility of a shared discourse through which conflicts might be resolved.’

As you say, they are delusional in thinking that restricting ourselves to biblical narratives can achieve that, given the history that we can all look back on. This is, of course very left-hemispheric in outlook, unable to accept the rich diversity of human experience, much like modern students of philosophy balk at the variety in traditional philosophical sources, and try to redact the curriculum, despite their ignorance.

I don’t think that ‘divine’ law needs to be questioned, but certainly translated as documented ideas of the past, which may have a bearing on living experience. However, it can’t be something that overrules experience, but, as you say, enables a genuine journey towards better discernment. Words are merely placeholders for meaning, and whether ‘spiritual’ or ‘individuation,’ it is hopefully a discovery of what life means.

The church is like a bride who got lost in the woods and is trying to find her partner again. She worries that it has been so long since she has seen him that she won’t recognize him. Angry at the forest for hiding him from her, she burns it down and kills him too.

1 Like