Yea, I know, I Ad homed, warn me, ban me I dont care, it felt right and is good. I won’t apologize or regret it.
I don’t want you banned Kris… you’re pretty nice. Polyamory takes a bigger heart than monoamory.
The sooner you realize you’re dealing with a for-reals mentally disabled person the sooner you’ll feel better about it. I don’t let him in my section of the forums, but apparently elsewhere the bar is just that low.
Uccisore, I’ve diagnosed you as a narcissist in so many ways… and actually I know enough about you that you don’t keep to your word, if I had something profound to say in politics, you’d let it in, we both know that, so stop playing games.
Unlike you, I’ve actually been evaluated by some of the best psychologists and psychiatrists in the world, I have real street cred that I’m not mentally disabled.
Interesting, after I posted the difference between psychologist and psychiatrist you now have been examined by both not just psychologists. And by the best in the world not just a very renowned hospital.
Yeah, that’s a pattern with this guy. If you take a moment to explain to him what something is or what a word means, he’ll claim to know more about it than you five minutes later.
It’s a very renowned hospital because it attracts the best scholars in the world. There’s not much difference. Uccisore is manipulating you Kris. Uccisore wants me off these boards, as of before I posted my first post here. He’s drawn to the profundity of what I write and how I can articulate some things, and is projecting his actual narcissism upon that profundity and calling me a narcissist. I don’t have NPD. I actually don’t have a mental defect. Everything I’m saying about you and Uccisore right now, is perfectly rational.
I have known Ucci for years, in fact he and I disagree far more than we agree . A narcissist, no, not a chance in hell. If I agree with Ucci, then the cue ball strikes true.
He’s been staking me on the boards because he knows my arguments against God are extremely profound, he’s playing word games. You can easily profile narcissists by their user names or username comments. Uccisore calls himself “the legitimizer”, that’s an easy diagnosis for NPD. He’s projecting his NPD on me. Same thing with mr. reasonable, one of the biggest trolls on these boards… you can actually diagnose people on this type of criteria.
Case in point. I introduced him to the concept of narcissism a few days ago, to suggest that he might be suffering from it. Of course he immediately declared that was preposterous- he can’t be a narcissist because he doesn’t lack empathy, he says. Nevermind that that’s one of 8 criteria that you only need 5 of to be diagnosed.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissist … y_disorder
He claims to to not lack empathy, so therefore the rest doesn’t matter.
Fast forward a couple of days, and now he can diagnose people as narcissists by their screen names- in other words, zero of the recognized criteria matter when he’s calling somebody else a narcissist, and they only matter selectively to him when deflecting said criticism about himself. He has his own definitions for words that allow him to be an expert on anything he chooses, because that’s how he gets self worth. So like I said, he’s not a mentally fit individual that you’re merely having a disagreement with. He’s mentally unstable, incapable of reasoning properly, and ought to be handled with that in mind.
That’s not the link you sent me Uccisore =) The link you sent me said that the criteria for all narcissists was the lack of being able to detect people’s emotions (and sociopaths to detect them but not care), and then went on to list another 9 criteria. So already, you’re being disingenuous. You really don’t believe that I’ve been evaluated by some of the worlds experts in personality disorders, after I explained to you that I spent 2 1/2 years under constant observation at the hospital most renowned for personality disorder patients in the world. You’re being an asshole dude. You’re stalking me because you know that my arguments against God are exceptional and unprecedented, and you are projecting the “unprecedented” part on me with your own narcissism. I said point blank in that thread, that people who believe in God, believe in a ONE OVER ALL, rather than community, and are narcissists at heart, being sycophants to the concept of ONE. And you’re calling me a narcissist!!! Dude, you need to check your head. And yes Uccisore, you can actually diagnose narcissists that way. You see, what you don’t know, is when I was a patient there, I got 2 1/2 years of TRAINING from some of the best psychologists and psychiatrists in the WORLD, who declared me perfectly sane and without mental defect. They often said that I was saner than they were in discussions, or in a round about way, they would say “who is the client and who is the patient here?” Uccisore accuses me of not understanding anything because Uccisore respects arguments from authority and hates me for not getting a college education… but he’s being a hypocrite, because these are WORLD experts in their field.
If you do the math…
Assuming an average of 1 woman per day for 80 years … that’s still only 1x365x80= 29,200
Doesn’t a dude have something better to do? Like bowling.
1,000’s of years before 50 years ago women were open to being nude. Ancient Rome, Greece, Egypt, etc. Sex was huge.
Women would feed their babies out in the open all the time.
I think even in ancient times sexual stratification still existed, it’s one of the markers of our species, and is kinda humbling when people try to think of us as such a high species. Most species have a 10/90 ratio for sexual stratification. which is even higher that Paretto. (80/20)
I suppose you have non-hearsay evidence of this assertion?
Yes and time will see that part of the cycle fully back. Societies, like the world, goes through cycles. Sexual behaviors go through prim to brazen etc etc. Queens and kings bought and sold to ensure safety, allies, food, wealth. Genetic lines traded and thrown away. Men dominated, women dominated, its all cycles. We throw away or keep in order to evolve and change.
Now, throughout the majority of the civilized world, we are gender equal and gender friendly. There are still those that want their gender superior or fear the other. That is natural.
Heck, some of my roosters are gentle to hens others are violent. Some hens kick the crap out of any rooster but their own, some submit to all. Sound familiar??
Ever hear of sex linking?
It’s amazing how someone talks about a little nipple and the thread starts to get crazy.
…that bar being Off Topic, with the option to move threads to Rant if need be.
The OP was fine and brought to mind the many instances that female acquaintances have deliberately worn clothing to show and enhance their cleavage… many females do it, especially when going to bars and clubs.
My male acquaintances are equally intent in preening to attract.
I’m sure there’s a percentage of males and females that use the above tactics to increase their chances of attraction.
My criticism was more for Philosophy and especially Religion. I dump Ecmandu threads here myself, it seems just the place for them.
Sex linking is a term used in breeding, it is also known as gender linking. Pretty interesting. In poultry for instance you take a purebred rooster of one breed a purebred hen from another and the offspring take after the parent of the opposite gender. A hen will take after her father’s breed and a rooster will take after his mother’s breed.