A View On Women

A post written by Parodites

First, to be very clear: males and females both have to suppress their sexual nature in order to divert creative, libidinal energy to higher things- that’s one fundamental psychodynamic law Freud got correct- libido when diverted amounts to the energy of genius itself, the creative force civilization is made from, though how it is diverted Freud wasn’t so insightful on. Given that their base natures are transformed in that way, men and females can both achieve genius: if men fail to do so, we all know what they become, but let us examine the un-repressed female human being and what a wonderful creature it is. The fact of the matter is this: if it was up to women, we’d still be living in tune with nature, hiding out in caves and picking berries to survive, or scavenging lion kills like we did 10,000 years ago, fucking dying at 18 because of an infected stubbed toe. Men built every civilization that has ever existed. While women were gathering flowers we developed agriculture. We’ve invented everything from the computer to philosophy to rocket science to probably every fucking thing you can put your eyes on in the room you’re reading this on right now. We’re the ones who have had to go to war and get killed trying to preserve this thing. We to this day, males, constitute a massive majority with regard to dangerous jobs, building the fucking bridges and laying the road etc. as well, while women take degrees in gender studies, become academics and professors, and brainwash everyone’s kids with their Leftist horseshit- most of which is all about dumping the entire planet’s problems on the back of the white males who produced every fucking thing they value in life. As far as I’m concerned, we built civilization, it’s our house and they’re just guests, who have no right to complain even if we did live in a patriarchy. (we don’t.) If it’s misogynistic to admit the undeniable fact that males invented pretty much all of this shit, died in wars defending all of this shit, and continue dying to this day doing all the dangerous jobs that are required to sustain all of this shit, then I guess I’m a fucking misogynist, and so is reality. If they want to prove this incorrect, then let all of these delusional Amazonian princesses go start their own civilization somewhere so we can all gather around and watch it sink into the fucking bottom of the ocean like Atlantis.

Now, I’m not about to defend the ridiculous thesis that all women are whores. No. Just that most women are whores. Say, 97-98 percent, tops. Women are biologically programmed to choose the men who provide them the most and seem to be the strongest, not specifically in a physical way, but in whatever way one male can prove superior to another. The Nazis experienced a baby boom with all the French and European women that turned their backs on their compatriots so they could bend over for a nice serving of authentic German wiener schnitzel and take them as husbands while they conquered their native lands. Women have no biological instinct for loyalty. Even among other women, they are revengeful and quite easily given to betrayal. Because they lack this instinct, concepts like nationalism are inexplicable to them. Women, who mostly control the political system now, vote to welcome hordes of hostile immigrants and actively pursue the self-annihilation of their native culture- female politicians in Germany claim that it is a good thing that Germans will be a minority in their own nation in 50 years. Let’s be clear- women are the ones who vote the most and they are mostly the ones deciding these self-destructive policies when it comes to immigration and the refugee crisis. Another reason they behave this way is because they have very small amgdyalas in comparison to men, the fear and threat processing center in the brain. Their diminished capacity to assess threats alone should render them unfit for holding political office or voting at all, since the assessment of threat is perhaps the most central issue in any politics. But I’d be willing to compromise and just set up a system where, in order to vote, you first have to serve for a certain amount of time in the military and sacrifice something real to the nation whose destiny you are attempting to control through the political process, (take the vast majority of female voters out of the equation right there) plus you only get to vote if you own land, since then you would have something at stake that you could lose through errant policies and failures of the state. Plus you have to take a test to see if you know enough about economics, history, and policy to vote. (take out the rest of the female voters.)

Their biological instinct is to side with the victorious male. Conquered females of one tribe willingly give themselves to the conquering tribe, betraying their fellow male citizens that just got killed trying to defend them, as the European females did with the Nazis. That happens continuously throughout history. The females that did not do so, and who had an instinct for loyalty, were simply killed by the conquerors, so their genetics died out from our species. The female mind has thus been shaped evolutionarily by the most aggressive, successful male conquerors: this has also bred a propensity in them to fantasize about being raped (polls repeatedly show that’s the most common sex fantasy for females of all ages) and controlled. 80 percent of raped women report having an orgasm during the rape: these same women whose husbands haven’t been able to make them orgasm in 10 years through consensual sex after having spent however much money on them and listening to their bullshit for years. Fucking disgusting.

Females are inherently disloyal, unable to assess threat, have no moral instinct, have evolved to seek out their own abuse and to compromise their native society by gravitating towards external powers that seem to be at an advantage, and had nothing to do with the rise of civilization- a male invention. Evidence to everything I am saying here is readily available and isn’t going away because it makes people uncomfortable to admit. Look at male serial killers and see how there are somehow these massive groups of women who become obsessed with them, send them love letters in jail, etc, even if they have committed grotesque crimes- it’s not uncommon for them to essentially have their own groupies. Now look at female serial killers and notice that there are no males obsessed with them or writing them letters, even if they’re hot as fuck like Jodi Arias or Casey Anthony, in fact males despise female criminals to a greater extent than they despise other male criminals. I’d still fuck both of them though, but only in the ass, so I’m not entirely without standards. Who gets laid more easily- drug dealing gang bangers or math teachers? Fucking drug addicts get laid more easily than math teachers, as I have personally observed. Women aren’t merely attracted to brutal controlling douchebags- they’re even attracted just to assholes, anyone fucked up or risky or dangerous, scoundrels and addicts and liars more than they are to straight edge, successful, safe men.

So I have to give Islam props for at least suppressing females and their fucked up sexual propensity, the one thing it has going for it. But Muslims are fucking stupid and have IQs of 80 to 85 on average so instead of diverting all of the conserved libidinal energy to culture like the Greeks did they are just waging war on everyone and blowing their own spawn up with suicide vests. The fact that they breed 4 kids to every 1 of ours doesn’t mean much when they blow two or three of them up. LoL. A single European nation has achieved more culturally in the last decade then the Muslim world has achieved collectively in 1,500 years. That’s not an opinion: write down the achievements, publications, scientific breakthroughs of a random Eu. state, then write down those of all the Muslim majority nations of the world put together, and take a look at which is longer.

This is the most despicable, retarded thing every uttered: those who separate morality from politics understand neither. Rousseau. He was the grandfather SJW, who Nietzsche bitterly despised by the way, and rightfully so, because that’s the total failure of Western civilization summed up in one god damn sentence, a sentence that crystallizes Rousseau’s philosophy in general. That is the logic behind the Leftists who actually criticize people for drawing cartoons about Mohammed due to their being insensitive- as opposed to the Muslims who fucking shoot them to death because of it. They are so interested in the complexity of the issue, and “weighing” our right to speak against the Muslims’ right to be offended, their marginalization- and their right to kill us. Unfortunately, morality is based on human concepts like equality and justice and rights and things of that nature, the things the Melians babbled about while Athens sacked their dumbass island, the stuff the Jews babbled about while Rome enslaved them, the shit the Greeks babbled about while Rome kicked them and their pederast boy-fucking degenerate aristocrats out of their own civilization for the barbarians to have- human concepts which don’t actually exist and possess no real parallel anywhere in time, space, or the known universe, so when you attempt applying morality to politics (which is about things like groups, nations, races, power, social structures, intelligence differences, biology- shit that does exist) what happens is-- you fuck up, like we’ve been doing in the middle east, scratching our heads wondering why they won’t just get on board with the democracy thing and hold hands and sing songs with us over the globalist multicultural bonfire, because after all it is equal and just and moral.

I don’t have any problem with people of middle eastern descent. If a person is middle eastern and doesn’t buy into the Islamic bullshit, he or she is equal to anyone else. But I have a problem with Muslims, indeed. Islam- that is, the Koran itself, demands that all Muslims either work toward establishing a caliphate and, if one presently exists, to swear allegiance to the caliph and immediately migrate to the territory and foreign power occupied by him and his forces, so I consider the Islamic faith inherently criminal, in effect an act of treason against the state. The ideology derived from it even in moderate form is still incompatible with Western civilization. I don’t even consider it a religion. Unlike Judaism and Christianity, the Koran contains a political system, economic system, and the blueprint for a theocratic totalitarian regime embedded (centered around the caliph) in the “religious” praxis itself, inseparable from it, so I consider Islam to actually be a kind of political system more like communism or fascism than anything else, cleverly disguised by religious imagery and mystical code words. Islam is just the fetid, rotting afterbirth of Abraham’s revelation, a fan fiction on the old testament, an appropriation of the Abrahamic faith by a half insane epileptic, child raping, serial killing, thieving, criminal, incest engaging-in, camel fucking, gang-leading, tribal war chief for entirely non religious, political purposes, so that he could unite the disparate marauding tribes of his fellow retarded, neurotic desert spawn and overthrow the government, a twisted form of gnosticism, a pseudo-Manichean apocalyptic cult that conceives matter itself to be evil and everything from music to love to sex to be an expression of evil because it is an expression of matter, within which the Jewish longing to fuse together with the universe and God which blossomed into Christianity has been twisted into a worship of death and a mindless celebration in the destruction of everything human, a total rejection of philosophy, science, and the logos itself going back to the 11th century Muslim Arabic theologian Al-Ghazali and his text “on the incoherence of philosophy”.

In conclusion: fuck whores and fuck Islam, one of them figuratively speaking. But with the continuing abasement of civilization they go hand and hand. Islam suppresses female sexuality- but it completely lets male sexuality loose. (The Jews and Christianity repressed both male and female sexuality.) Unrepressed male sexuality is as destructive as unrepressed female sexuality, and while the portrait of the unrepressed females I just painted was hardly flattering, just look at these Muslims to see what males are naturally. The female instinct is to be conquered and compromise society from the inside out and open it to destructive external forces, while the male instinct is to be the conqueror and destroy everything that doesn’t belong to your tribe, as the Muslims relish destroying culture, burning books, etc and anything that isn’t about Allah. This is why the social forms like the familial structure, marriage, etc. which you seem to consider oppressive and the left outright rejects are to me necessary, some of the things holding civilization together. Our natural sexuality and instincts must be oppressed, suppressed, repressed, compressed, depressed- anything at all save for expressed. In their natural unrepressed form, female human beings are fucking revolting morally infantile retards incapable of loyalty and men are completely blind and destructive toward everything that doesn’t come from their own tribe to the point of being basically suicidal, incapable of civilization even in the most basic form.

We’re basically chimpanzees that can talk, people, that’s our genetic programming. It should be common sense that we have to repress our own nature somehow in order to make civilization work. We didn’t evolve to have civilization, reason, or any of this symbolic material now available to us. Nature made us more intelligent than we needed to be by the mere breadth of a hair and we just accidentally stumbled onto agriculture, which led us down the road of civilization from the philosophers in Athens down to the modern era, and now here are. We have not been neurologically equipped with any mechanism that would make it easy for us to maintain our handle on civilization, and we are in fact at war with our own biology.

I agree with not much of this…

Women have orgasms at a rate of almost 3 times the orgasms being raped than not raped…

That statistic will always cause me to commit suicide!

Evolutionarily speaking, it is puzzling how our species could survive if all it took was a stubbed toe to take us out. I would assume we had stronger immune systems and infections did not do as much damage, I’m not sure.

(Parodites ranting? Usually he posits well-measured, quality pieces, rather than frustrated outbursts. Ordinarily, I quite enjoy his outlooks, his philosophical gleanings, his style.)

Note that I am “quoting the entirety of the original authors work” in the OP as my proofs that men have created Hell on Earth from the beginning of man, yet the brunt of the blame is directed by sexistly, corrupted views on women as mistakenly held by the author of the OP. However inconvenient it is to refer to the OP; it’s length to be re-copied in full constrains my alternative view on women and makes this post way too long.

Women, the fairer sex, are irrevocably innocent due their lack of accomplishments in advancing civilization throughout history which leaves the globally trashed landscape relatively unscathed by the creative forces of women. What we as civilization are to deal with is a global landscape bullied by men, to produce unsustainable quantities of activities that compromise the quality of all life on Earth, even eliminating life forms without serious consideration in terms of repercussions felt as an after effect. Thus the loss of entire untampered with gene pools, pure diversity in all forms of life, plant and animal.

Men take credit in their creations, yet not the responsibility for their lack of forethought in all that they have destroyed on their continued quest to force their creative ambitions. The worst of which is yet to come by male ingenuity as well, be it by war, famine, plague, global economic collapse, or any other number of embittered ends in our foreseeably, short future as a species.

Women lean towards passivism in regards to perpetrating rape, murder, war, genocide, etc; men not so much to put it mildly. Women also tend to lean towards self-survival, which is a sane stance in an insane, male-dominated world. The only betrayers of civilization, of tribes, of families are the men who have chosen their own desires for glory and advancement over the future health of the Earth and its’ inhabitants.

For me, the OP, “A View On Women,” actually does the reverse of its intention to malign women, instead revealing the inadequacies of the male mind and ego; male failures to remain solid in form, in action, in word no matter their self-made predicament. From men, by their hands, backs, mental genius forged all things worthy, not women. Those very masculine accomplishments, man-made civilization from agriculture on, turns an about face, to face off against itself while the reigns of progress remain soundly in male hands. What then does any man have to complain about? Men lead. Women follow. A simple reflection on reality.

The entire piece amounts to a scream for some kind of recompense for which, the author, Parodites, feels to have been slighted by nature and her biological processes, with every empassioned keystroke.

I can almost hear similar, creative, male mind’s screaming, “Mother Nature, another whore of betrayal that must die and there’s nothing you other whores can do to stop us from continually shoving our self-importance down her throat like poison!”

Perhaps I’m too dramatic, a women’s undoing so say men, but philosophy needs more passionate exuberance to sustain her until a woman’s genius figures out how to save us from eminent doom.

{Haters hate! No slacking!}

The entire logical praxis is stupid.

Some men are good, some arent. There isn’t a coherent body of men called “men”. Men have the potential to do good or bad with their tools. And men have the right to complain, when their rights are ignored by the small group of men who have power over them.

Trix,

Men are men; that’s biology, decided by chromosomes. As you wrote Trixie, “Men have the potential to do good or bad with their tools.” Men with tools of destruction do bad? Men with tools of creation do good? Those are loaded questions. :laughing:

On this forum, the men with their tools write, promote, condone views on women, portraying women as whores. Is that done for the good or bad of forum members? Society? Civilization? Or is it just a sad reflection of reality at large?

As a politician, I am afraid to respond to that.

Trix,

=D> You make my days brighter with your humor.

I rather enjoy Parodites more lowbrow outbursts, they are still of wonderful style and the passion is clean.

I know Parodites does, as do I, have women in his life that he respects very much, and all this is certainly not a resentful reaction out of sex deprivation, as that is not an issue with him. It is only a release of thoughts that have been accumulating in very, very many men the past decade.

Note that he makes this claim about the majority of women. It is not a categorical classification. So you, MM, are the real sexist here…

I might have added “The authors views don’t necessarily reflect my own.” This is true. I simply think this view is more and more relevant, and this is among the more powerful ways Ive seen it communicated.

Thank you dear, the most funny jokes are often serious and often based on the facts.

He’s all over the place, Fixed. He’s in disagreement with himself. At one point, he’s all about the conquering pride of the Romans, but then he has “no problem” with someone of mid-east descent… I.e. the real problem is the ideology and race doesn’t matter at all. But then, at the same time he’s critical of women who vote for pro immigration policies and he’s in favor of Nietzsche’s order of rank. Anger like this isn’t bad but it exhausts itself very quickly… It’s the kind of anger that politicians are very skilled at using to their advantage.

I think anger directed at a women is almost encouraged, because women will always be able to take it. It’s a simple and easy outlet, and it’s a role that women naturally take on.

Also how “real” are Judaism and Christianity as religions compared to Paganism?

There is much vitriol in this post written by Parodites but it is all very incoherent running all over the place.

While it’s true a majority of women are awful there are I think a minority of women diverging away from the majority on this issue slowly overtime. It should be interesting as feminism backfires completely to the point of destroying societies everywhere if this minority of women that reject the bankrupted social decadence of feminism eventually become the new majority. They are an evolving and adapting biological mutation of their sex where like all mutations that start small only time will tell if they’ll go from minority status to a majority one.

[Like women against feminism for instance as example.]

For the time being society and civilization is reaping the worldwind of feminism along with political correctness. This unfortunately has become the dominant culture and mental form of thinking for the majority. This was no accident in that it was implemented by governments as a way of creating a more socially controllable and manageable environment.

From here on out it will only get more interesting as the years pass. One thing is for certain and that is it will all end up in disaster socially eventually.

Your error is to state that the horrors of civilization is perpetuated by all men.

It’s only a handful of men [minority] that controls everything and many men [majority] especially the lower ranking ones are incapable of doing anything in their powerless state. I also hold such doubts on your comment that all women are innocent. There’s an old saying, for every powerful man there is an equally powerful woman that rules from the bedroom. Women hold positions of power in civilization just as much as men do especially now.

At any rate it’s not like we live in a world where women don’t have any influence whatsoever and really what is more bothersome is the lack of women hardly at all commenting on the ugly state affairs of the world. From what I’ve seen women aren’t very much vocal on anything publicly.

FC,

Your accusation of my sexism has been noted.

It was kind of you in the face of my calling men: rapists, murders, war-mongerers, and genocidal lunatics.

In a nutshell, masculine labels listed above which I, a sexist women, aspire to acquire without the merit’s obtained through perpetrating those behaviors of rape, murder, war, genocide. As you men lead and we women follow, sexist females are attempting to usurp the ideals of depravity that men have created for us throughout history.

While I do not deny my reactionary sexism in this thread, I implore you to envision your life as a woman, here, now. How might you feel regarded and regard yourself?

FC, a smug and/or dismissive reply or absence of a reply will speak volumes of the respect you hold for any women. Tread carefully; I’m locked and loaded, militarily trained by fellow sexist’s, men . :mrgreen:

Pburn,

“I think anger directed at a women is almost encouraged, because women will always be able to take it. It’s a simple and easy outlet, and it’s a role that women naturally take on.”

Anger at women is ‘almost’ encouraged? Perhaps you “think” rather than feel due to the evolutionary, Y chromosomes genetic shortcomings; your ilk obviously hasn’t the capacity to do both, think and feel simultaneously.

Anger at women is encouraged; this is a sad, sad truth. Women take men’s anger in every horrific way imaginable. However, it never was, nor is “a role that women naturally take on.” Women have been subjugated into being punching bags for men from the beginning of humanity.

Being a women who “will always be able to take it” signifies that women are the superior gender. Thanks PB for pointing that out.

Women may be punching bags, but men are the bullet, and scum bags. Men fight and die in meaningless wars, and are deemed the scum of society.

Trix,

Who deems that men are the scum of society?

The men choose to be bullets and the women fall as their targets just the same as any target.

I said men are bullet bags, not bullets.
The world says males are expendable, and society says male sexuality = inappropriate scumbaggery. People don’t want to see men naked, they want women naked. People dont want gays kissing, they want lesbians kissing.
Now you might say that according to magazines, and billboards and shit, male sexuality is supported by society. But that’s just fake bullshit, in reality it’s not, society supports female sexuality, it is females that choose to accept/reject not males. Females get cat called and chased after, not males. Sexual stratification, 300 males competing for 1 woman. And most of the women that aren’t sought after, have easy pickins to have whatever reject they like.

You missed the point. A man always taking his frustration out on a woman is wasting his time, and feeding into the system . Venting on a woman doesn’t necessarily mean physical abuse.

Also, the most empathetic are men. What do you have against the Y chromosome? How do you know women have always been subjugated? What about before recorded history? Men were always brutes and women were always ? Is female aggression not also destructive?

PB,

“You missed the point. A man always taking his frustration out on a woman is wasting his time, and feeding into the system . Venting on a woman doesn’t necessarily mean physical abuse.”

What legitimate point did I miss? Is this supposed point a ploy of namely ‘laissez-faire ridiculousness’, a careless, quick read of my points, or ignorance due to the Y chromosome? You’ve stumped me.

However, you are right that venting on a woman doesn’t necessarily mean physical abuse. Venting is verbal abuse too, which is encouraged, correct? The receipt of ill treatment is (what was the word you used PB?) “naturally” our role, our lot.

Women are targets for all types of abuse. I may be overly speculating on the number of types of targets woman are, such as drone targets. :-k No, women die in drone strikes. So a long list seems appropriate and is in the works with your name on it, PB. Please just don’t get frustrated with me and feed the system.

Now are men the most empathetic before committing a violent act, while committing a violent act, or after committing a violent act?