Erm - well, my understanding is that, since the dawn of civilization, women have been in charge. A man is only in charge in the wild. Women force the man to go to war, then she will sleep with him. Woman has all the power over life, she can keep her pregnancy or not. Women is the dominant sexual selector. Now that she also aspires to political power, the medium whereby men used to try to accommodate women, she has no fucking inkling of what she is anymore.
I would least of all beings like to be a feminist.
I am thinking and feeling. I feel sick to my stomach as I think, but this particular forum is a relief cause usually it doesn’t require me to think very hard( most posts are wots that have an error near the first paragraph so i dont have to expend much energies on reading them, since most of them start out with a flawed praxis that it builds itself on, so i dont have to waste neurons on the post. other posts are dry and boring wots, much ado about nothings, just rehashes of old philosophies that don’t really go anywhere interesting.)
As cruel as it is, western civilization has at its very root the power of the beautiful woman to plunge nations into war. All of Homers tale originates with the coveted beauty of Helen.
This is why I say, it depends on which woman or man I am. The order of rank among women is far more cruel and direct than among men; the fact of feminine sexual power is too obvious to ignore, whereas the masculine version demands demonstration in time, a woman can simply sit and emit power.
As beautiful as a male can be, his appearance never has the effect on women that a beautiful woman has on men; for men it is a matter of biological honor to compete for such a woman; because all other woman flock to men who ‘just dont care’ - this type of woman flocks to no one. Nature flocks to her.
Such beauty is an accumulation of power, in all its historic subtlety, and regarded by ancients as Form in the primordial sense; all Force moves in this direction, want to enter and become this.
Furthermore, what is stopping women from taking action? We’re fully gender-liberated by law but I see no women innovators of any global worth save a few exceptions that would be considered minor, most I see is women running to the shoestore and driving in SUVs.
I think you girls need to get off your high horse and tread the mud like we men have been doing if you want that kind of credit. Jeanne d’Arc, that’s a girl I respect on the terms you want to own.
Being a man demands a lot - a lot of women do appreciate this, and some even make their relationship decisions based on this. But mostly women complain about not being given enough power.
Who ever heard a grown man complaining about such a thing?
This is because real women are autogynephilic, soaking up their own beauty. Men are like accessories to them, ways in which to gaze themselves in the mirror. This is why women don’t go crazy for beautiful males unless they are more beautiful than she is, in which case she enables her own male psychology and the male becomes a surrogate female for her. Masculinity is only a function of the accessory, she desires a handy man around like a wind up doll, true masculinity implies an accessory that is potentially dangerous to its user, this is why all males (even badboys and alphas) must embody feminine psychology during the courting process, to make her feel calm and safe around them. Partners are only slightly more masculine than their counterparts, this is why they are called “partners”, they both have the same subspecie psychology…Robin is simply a slightly different version of Batman.
[/size]
This is, the romance, sex is the charade.
Otto Weineger described the 50/50 balance of it all. If the above paragraph confused you, My paragraph above does not conflict with Otto’s 50/50 schemata.
Imagine if two females were thrust into a playground. One of them is given a male body, the other female.
Now you understand sexual mechanics, in terms of it’s charade.
Your argument does not follow. A 4 year old knows how to bite someone. Knowing aint the same as doing.
Women dont force men to go to the draft. Its only a function of “does it make her feel safe” and yes dominance displays can make her more deep in love but also backfire if not in tune with the spectator’s tastes.
The embittered man thinks that all a woman has to do is to bat her lashes and she will get what she wants. He sees all women as gold digging whores because that’s exactly how he would act if he were a woman, ready to spread his legs even for the smallest token. He’s bothered because he prefers taking shortcuts himself (even as a man!) and as a result, becomes overtaken by envy.
All people are manipulators, the question in ethics is one of degree and type. Homosapian is above the animals only because they can inherently manipulate easier. When people manipulate other people, things get touchy between people. Terrorism, False-flags, financial and emotional usury are about manipulating large numbers of people, the “masses”. Animal farming, trapping, and hunting are manipulation of specific animals. Fishing and farming are also manipulating other life. Manipulation is just what homosapian does.
All women always manipulate their surroundings. That is how they stay alive. Men do the same thing, merely in slightly diffe3rent ways. And then because people are not very good at determining exactly how much is too little or too much, they are always going over-board and manipulating the wrong things, the wrong ways, or the wrong amounts.
So yes, women manipulate men. It’s good that they do. What is bad is that they can’t easily tell how much is too much or too little. They are often taught (especially since 1970) to not care (“Be a good Nietzschian” - “Me, me, me…”).
But what in all of that isn’t equally true of men? Who was it that taught the women to be more selfish if not certain men being too selfish? Men quite carelessly and blindly manipulate entire populations across many countries. And manipulate them into thinking that it is all the fault of “those other people”, “those women”, “those whites”, “those blacks”, “those liberals”, “those conservative” … those “other” people. Who else could it be?
I don’t agree with this. Look at a any typical rock concert, how women go mad for the lead singer. Doesn’t Venus flock to Adonis? (surely she can simply sit and emit power). Although you raise an interesting question. Woman’s appearance arouses man’s sense of honor, but does man’s appearance arouse a woman’s sense of honor? Is man more empowered when he mirrors himself in another man (or doubles himself) or with a woman? Are woman capable of laying " placid as a mirror that the deep sky may be reflected in it" like the genius of heart (Nietzsche)? Does this require woman be a friend? Does the eternal return cancel out the possibility of woman ever being a friend?
"Joan la Pucelle: Once I encounter’d him, and thus I said:
‘Thou maiden youth, be vanquish’d by a maid:’
But, with a proud majestical high scorn,
He answer’d thus: ‘Young Talbot was not born
To be the pillage of a giglot wench:’
So, rushing in the bowels of the French,
He left me proudly, as unworthy fight. " -Sh
Do you mean this? Because I completely agree with it.
This is why I cant keep a girlfriend.
[/quote]
Somewhere Nietzsche talks about how women collect men like pieces of furniture.
What insight. Im afraid you misunderstand men. A powerful man will always be affected by a beautiful woman, in fact they are almost always the reason he wants power. Its only that he now has more choice, and his standard shifts.
Did you not get the point about Homer?
Your statement about power corroborates the OP’s point about whores.
That is why rock stars tend to look like women - role reversal…like turd furgeson said…they are whoring themselves on stage…female becomes surrogate male and male becomes female.
justin bieber, elvis presley, black veil brides all looked like women.
Because of that narrow ratio a man has to fit in… not too fierce, not too independent, basically just domesticated. The other option is to be someone like mr Reasonable, or for two people to totally ignore the spirit of the time like Sauwelios and his girl do.
Most of the rest is just male attributes dangling from masculine minded women. Its literally suffocating to be around 99 percent of couples under 50. But I mean literally, I cant breathe.
I dont think this is much of a refutation, to be frank. I stick to my point.
Ive had it with women pretending to be so powerless. Its absolutely prepostrous.