Corporations buy up the government genius.
So are geniuses owned by the government sold at a price? Odd, since, when you have a genius, you can ask for money
So, you say no corporation is against the state, oh for sure!
1 Like
This whole thing is not rapped around Communis or Capital(ism) and not even the NWO, it is not even about The Good, it’s a bout a test over the variability of the New Colonialism, of slavery, of whom by whom. All economy of the world falls under, and off the grid of the I’d rather not be as conspicuous as to hide deletions here and there, for fear of being kicked in the arse, or worse humiliated .
The humanism masked by the liberals, libertarians and what you got, is beginning to wear thin, progressively by narrowing margins. Leading to the distrust of so called artificially simulatedgenious: and the claim that simulation lacs luster that the aura of decompression can violate anything on account by proxy.
These subtly forward situations can make a huge difference, as safeguards to depression can avert a real great one. Cynicism and skepticism will no longer be tolerated, soon, also on account.
1 Like
I have started referring to this historical era of ours as one as being of cognitive mental slavery. The invisible bars and cages is the hallmark of this era as the goal is total mental captivity.
Until the simulacra can be caught up with the simulation as a process of understanding that invisibility, a vital part of imminent organized power, that can become indistinctly overcome, and develop the will to do so.
Maybe it will be remembered as another passing fancy, simultaneously with the vital need of the only means of representing it, this process which is indeed a regeneration of authentic and progressive means to regain control and trust in the future of macjinery that will underwrite and guarantee the eternally manifested proof of surviving tenets of existence as a form of slavery of all for the common good.
Slavery as an intrinsic part of colonies as meta formal as within the of the hives, creates patterns of conscious states which produce the sweetness of everyday life. In fact each member knows this, workers. And producers alike, and that is why the mystical participation rites of pre cognitive slavery show a model that simulation will demonstrate.
Taking the liberty by absurd demonstration has notable precedents, and once the fear of such demonstration is overcome, which has been done a mere few centuries ago: irony will melt into cynicism, decompensating it’s power into a tautology.
The uncertainty at this current time you mention, has reached a tremendous urgency, as if this was the last and only possible universe. But is it? NlBut even if it’s not, why give up on this one so casually?
This non sense reserves the right to reduction,
1 Like
I wonder if you have some people around that tell you from time to time ‘oh, how interesting’ about that kind of writings. Some people either fake amusement as if in front of a child or either are really amused by stuff they don’t comprehend. Sometimes what they don’t comprhened is actually wrong, tho. Happens quite a lot.
That could have led to incentivize this
1 Like
Some ‘things’ are inconceivable.
1 Like
For me it is really simple, what kind of society do we want to live in?
One that worships the minority of the superwealthy where only they get to have any semblance of a normal life or one that guarantees that the majority of people have a standard of livelihood? Which is it? Pick one.
Right now we have a system that is a tyranny by a minority and I oppose that.
I would want to live in neither of those systems.
The entire governance structure itself is a fallacy.
The moment you create kingdoms, the moment you organize tens if not hundreds of millions of people, you are already lost in the sauce.
I would like to live like in the old days, with small groups of people and very down to earth problems. Not diplomacy, gdp, governance and economy. Just hunting, building, helping eachother out as we were meant to be.
I honestly dont see any method of governance which would not eventually derail, crash and burn. Doesnt matter if its the left or the right.
2 Likes
Even tribal chieftains with their tribal council of elders had their problems. I grew up around a few reservations myself and been to many all across the United States.
But yes, I do understand what you’re saying, simplicity versus complexity.
Nonetheless we cannot go back to that point without a violent collapse of civilization across the entire planet and given all the entrapments of modern civilization I don’t think humanity would survive that violent collapse of post modern civilization very well.
For me I try to find modern solutions for the problems we have today and I know no matter what direction one goes things will be imperfect but of course my goal is the general happiness of a majority of people uniting all differences when possible.
1 Like
1 Like
There was nothing leftist about fascism whether it was Germany, Italy, or Spain as it was a conservative political reaction against Russian communism. With fascism there is also a sort of conservative national collectivism.
Of course crazed liberal capitalists and libertarians believe everybody else is to the left of themselves when anything goes against their organized scam of crony capitalism. According to crazed liberal capitalists and libertarians all forms of collectivism is bad where anybody who doesn’t believe as they do are leftists.
Right, because liberal capitalist nations don’t have a form of national miltarism themselves.
Holy cope.
The difference between a sort of national fascism of Mussolini or even a Hitler is that under both government organizations private capital is completely subservient to the state.
Under liberal capitalism which in reality is a sort of political fascism to private superwealthy interests the state or government are completely subservient to the private interests of corporations. The state or government becomes owned by private capital.
A Mussolini or Hitler would concern themselves only with national economics, liberal capitalist nations by comparison only concern themselves with the movement of international capital safeguarding global economic capitalism itself.
Probably has something to do with Donald Trump being a rabid Zionist dragging the entire nation into yet another Middle East war at Israel’s behest.
25 years of endless war throughout the Middle East and this nation grows weary of it all.
Thankfully you’re a Canadian where you don’t have to worry about all of that. How is that Mark Carney of yours? Better than Trudeau?
Under communism all private capital and corporations are liquidated where everyone serves the state to which everything is public property and heavily regulated in the name of safeguarding public collective interests.
The goal is to protect the nation under the name of communism where greedy private superwealthy individuals are unable to carve up entire nations and regional portions of the world for themselves. Under liberal capitalism by contrast private individuals and private capital has more money than actual governments themselves. Do you not see the moral and ethical hazard there?
Why would i not see the hazard?
Its just that i see the hazard in both directions because never in human history have communist leaders acted in the interest of the people. Somehow they always ended up shitting in golden toilets while outside their window mass deaths occurred.
Who knows, maybe it would be simpler to just put an AI as leader. At least that does not need golden toilets.
1 Like
I for one dream of an intellectual government that politically puts the livelihoods of a majority of people ahead of profits, personal ambitions, and money. That’s why I am a Marxist.
Of course I only believe this is possible under the right conditions.
I refuse to fall into the pessimistic trap that everything is hopeless. That kind of despair isn’t helpful at all. I understand pessimism but we mustn’t let it overpower ourselves.
1 Like
It presently working in the Benelux countries, but that was before EU so I’m hard pressed to be certain.
1 Like