Ok so you take an or a few ideas or concepts then post them, the next person post something that will effect it in some way, and you keep going until the absolute extreme of the example is reached . Score yourself a point if you get there and nobody can take it further. Try to find solutions to extremes when found and carry on from that.
Iāll start with this, or you can start with something else if you likeā¦
I thought you said only one sentence, fuck this thread ur breaking ur own rules.
also, weird how you havenāt heard of contraceptionā¦
also, overpopulation doesnāt exist when you have unlimited resources, so you canāt even keep up with your own premises.
what the hell.
Well I could have got that into one sentence easy enough ~ it was a general thing.
Contraception was not one of the premises, but even with it, given enough time and a percentage of mistakes, tears and diseases passing even with condoms on, then you eventually arrive at massive overpopulation and disease. People will always want children so contraceptives are only a part removal of the problems.
Overpopulation X infinite resources = a planet completely filled with people, they then all have children and you have a planet filled with people + another layer of people standing on their heads. Keep going and I think the sheer mass of layers of people [millions billions etc] would create a black hole. That would be the furthest extreme Iād say.
Blow returned.
Now maybe start another trail of extremes? Oh and in one sentence shall herby simple refer to an approximate ~ the idea is to keep things simple then others can interject and we continually go off on tangents. Get it?
people often terat philosophy like a martial art. But itās the āblowsā that diminish its progress. āblowingā the opponent over just calls for regress. The whole point of dialectic is to get new information not knock ideas down.
So I think what Humpty would have liked to say, alternatively, Quetzalcoatl, is that your idea seems interesting but could use refinement. The way youāre going about it doesnāt seem to have sound logic.
How about this for extremes. We think weāre smart + we argue about stupid things + we war + we blow ourselves up + no humans + happy ending.
This reminds me of something else Iād wondered a while back. Does anyone know of any ontological wiki? I think it would be interesting to progress ontology into wiki form.
}