This is the second time I got banned at “philosophyforums.com” Am I a rebel? Have I offended anyone here?
Not me but then ive only just got here, give it time lol 
Dont they tell you why if they ban you? They not give you some idea?
Some people might argue that your posts can be troll-like, at times. Maybe that was it?
Troll like? what does that suppose to mean?
[size=150]troll[/size]
An outrageous message posted to a newsgroup or mailing list or message board to bait people to answer. Trolling is a form of harassment that can take over a discussion. Well meaning defenders can create chaos by responding to trolls. The best response is to ignore it. Also, the person who posts such messages.
http://www.walthowe.com/glossary/t.html
A purposely stupid, inflammatory, or downright wrong article (closely related to flamebait). Its purpose is to get people mad and make them look stupid and gullible
http://www.aol.com/netfind/newsgroup/glossary.html
An annoyance usually on Messageboards who posts for the purpose of causing a disturbance. Often by making comments of a slanderous nature, accusatory, or just general pain-in-the-assness.
http://www.sanguinarius.org/~sarasvati/terms.htm
A troublemaker who deliberately posts provocative, hostile or annoying messages in a newsgroup or mailing list with the specific intent of starting a flamewar. The practice is known as trolling.Related terms: Flame, Flamewar, Post, POST, Mailing list, Newsgroup web14.compaq.com/mypresario/glossary/index.asp
An outrageous message posted to a newsgroup or mailing list to bait people to answer. Trolling is a form of harassment that can take over a newsgroup or mailing list. Well meaning defenders can create chaos by responding to trolls. The best response is to ignore it.
http://www.lapasserelle.com/isc/Delphi_navnet/t.html
etc. etc. etc.
The mods of philosophyforum.com have a instinct for weirdo’s. Remeber Paul writing that’s it’s clear when someone is on a high. But I don’t think you are one of them. You’re maybe pseudo. Your username inclines to be.
A rebel… I dunno. Your Plato thread annoyed me… it was like you took some of Plato’s arguments and presented them in reverse… I began to think you were doing it on purpose. I used to do something similar to WhiteLotuis though, so I can’t really complain.
I wouldn’t classify you as a rebel.
World shaping revolution starters are my heroic rebels. They are truely the human elite. Don’t flatter yourself.
I say you’re Christ’s worst preacher.
Pureasonist
You never back up your accusations. You are hollow.
I thought this post is about you wanting some tenderness alone.
To back up my previous accusation, all I need to do is to copy and paste a few of your posts. But quoating stuff around isn’t my biz, can’t be bothered.
About the human elite, I ask you to read any major historical advancement. Right from the renaissance to the industrial revelotion, then you’ll realise how and why on earth you are actually talking to someone half a world apart, and not to get a straight punch in the face.
Bye the way, did the pope what’s-his-funky-name order the death of Galileo?
And who burned some of the most respected thinkers of all time, on that bloody avart of yours?
Oh my hollowness instantly filled full whenever I make a start on you.
Pureasonist
Me want tenderness? you are dreaming. No I just want to know HOW on earth can I offend people when I back everything I say with reason?
“To back up my previous accusation, all I need to do is to copy and paste a few of your posts. But quoating stuff around isn’t my biz, can’t be bothered.”
You have not backed anything up. In fact that paragraph of yours is pointless. Once again, you are saying you’ve got the goods, and as usual you are not showing it. If you can’t be bothered to argue then please stay in the rant house.
“About the human elite, I ask you to read any major historical advancement. Right from the renaissance to the industrial revelotion, then you’ll realise how and why on earth you are actually talking to someone half a world apart, and not to get a straight punch in the face.”
You have said nothing. Nothing at all. What do you mean by major historical advancement? You can’t argue. I hope you punch better than you argue, cuz you may mistakenly punch your reflection in the mirror.
Socrates if he always argue like he did in the Republic by Plato then he deserves to die. I am not familiar with Da Vinci’s case. And I don’t see anything wrong with burning pornography.
PoR, you are a narcist 
.
lossing focus there again?..
I said Galilio. You’re not familiar with Da Vinci, must mean you’re not familia with Galilio, must also mean you’re not familia with renaissance either. Well let me tell you something about it, christians worked their guts out to end this golden period of rebelion, which is the initiation point for the later boom of western culture. Well done Christs’ little fellows, you’re humanity’s delight.
Who mentioned plato and porn? Are you on another thread or something?
Tuihu
how can a true believer like myself be a narcist? Also, I got banned from that forum reason: badly misleading username.
Pureasonist
OMG, when you make changes to a post, make sure you put EDIT before the things you change. Don’t be sneaky, if you made a typo just say it you did it. Don’t lie.
If you actually read properly, I said “Da Vinci” (what you originally) wrote “case”, there is obviously none, so I never heard of it.
You method of deduction is flawed. Da Vinci is best known for his art, while Galileo best known for science. Just because I know nothing about art does not imply I know nothing of science. And I believe the Rennasance is comprised of more than 2 thinkers.
There is truth in what Galileo said. However he should have presented his findings in a different way. He committed suicide by directly challanging the church.
That’s the reason they gave you? That’s just bizarre! 
Are the mods simply atheists that have no respect for Christianity? Perhaps they find religion and reason to be at odds.
mods at philosophyforum is just bizzare. BMW-guy with over 1000 posts there got banned, membrain I know from that forum got banned. I wrote the mods a letter something along the lines of,
“badly misleading username” - Who have I “BADLY mislead” into BELIEVING I AM the Pinnacle of REASON? That person must be incredibly stupid and deserves to be mislead. There’s nothing on that forum anyway. This is the best forum I’ve ever come across.
they banned you for your username???
HeHeHeeee… 
About 30 years ago, when I was studying eastern philosophy, a disciple asked his guru about whether he should preach to christians. The guru quickly replied “No!.. Let jesus have the dumb ones”
Eveyone has their cross to bare PoR… 
“I wouldn’t want to belong to a club that would have me as a member” Groucho Marx
por, i have repeatedly said to myself that you are not actually trying. you are sitting at your computer laughing at all the jerks who try to reason with you.
i setup an anti christian rant specifically so that you may start an argument against it, and instead you start a different thread with an amusingly similar name (“The Christian Dogma Perforator” vs “The Citadel of Christ”) and in this thread you whine about how nobody wants to challenge the infallibility of christianity. come on!
POR wrote:
“There is truth in what Galileo said. However he should have presented his findings in a different way. He committed suicide by directly challanging the church.”
Oh how I laughed over and over again. You’ll do good as a comedian.
Galileo said? More like observed and discovered. There is truth? More like there is nothing wrong and everything is proven.
What different ways you suggest? To write something as disgustingly ambigious as you, like “I love ILP; but I’m unfairely attacked by all the rest.” ???
Committed suicide by challanging the church. I totally agree with that, and you put forward my point in style.