The way I see it, globalism isn’t Americanism, but they are related.
You could say globalism is a necessary consequence of Americanism.
Globalism came out of America, like America came out of Britain, and Britain came out of Europe.
The old European ruling class, the clergy and nobility, weren’t quite as entrenched in the British isles as they were in the rest of Europe.
Britain became a constitutional monarchy in 1688, greatly reducing the powers of the clergy and nobility.
And of course in America, the old European ruling class were even less entrenched, and it was able to fully rid itself of them, becoming a republic, inspiring many other nations in the Americas, Europe and the world over to become republics.
This liberal democratic republic, this quasi-meritocracy with its vast resources gave those able and willing to work hard and smart the opportunity to accumulate far more wealth than they ever could in any other place and at any other time in unrevised history.
Some were more talented and tenacious than others, some were luckier and more cutthroat, more ruthless than others.
Overtime a handful of individuals like John D Rockefeller (America’s 1st billionaire with a fortune worth nearly 2% of the national economy) grew monstrously wealthy, becoming America, and the world’s new ruling class.
They were banksters, captains of industry and media moguls.
By the mid-late 20th century they were becoming extremely socioculturally disconnected from their hosts, perhaps more so than any previous ruling class.
After all they’re the owners of multinational corporations, they’re the globalists.
By and large they began to turn on the nation, the liberal democratic republic that made their rise possible, and its people, first with monetarism and corporatism, then with woke, or rather political correctness.
And it’s not just the overclass, the upper (middle) class has also globalized, not only are they highly economically mobile, but geographically, they’re use to changing schools, jobs and residences many times throughout their lives, so many of them feel they have little-no loyalty to their nation, they’re cosmopolitans.
Ultimately the globalists aren’t American, even tho many of them hold American citizenship, as well as British, French, German and so on.
If America were to steeply decline, they’ll probably be just fine.
The globalists don’t care about America, they’re working on building a NWO, their Great Reset.
Ultimately what they care about is international organizations like the world bank, the world economic forum and the world health organization.
What they want is world government, with a world court, currency, anthem and flag.
They largely came out of America, and Britain, and France, but they’re just using them now as a launchpad.
They want world government based first and foremost on corporatism, and secondly on political correctness (scientism-technocracy, allopathy, psychiatry, climate change, population reduction, transhumanism, big brother, gun control, mass surveillance, ‘anti-racism’, feminism, queer theory).
These people aren’t conservative or traditionalists, not even in the economic sense, let alone the sociocultural, they’re both radicals, and elitists.
Political correctness has borrowed a lot from woke, from Marxism, especially cultural Marxism, but it’s not Marxism, ultimately it’s just whatever benefits the corporations dressed up as something else, it can masquerade as conservatism too, but woke is the preferred mask of the corporatocracy for the time being.
The very moment woke conflicts with their interests, they’ll ditch it for something else, or nothing at all, whatever suits them whenever.
They use woke like popes and kings used Christianity, they take the parts from it that can be used to fortify their reign while downplaying and discarding the rest.
