An imaginary conversation with Christopher Hitchens

An imaginary conversation with Christopher Hitchens


Characters:

  • Ethereal Christopher Hitchens (from here on just named Christopher).
  • Me (slightly mad, but quite lucid).

Christopher: “Do you believe in God?”

Me: “Yes.”

Christopher: “Why?”

Me: “I think there has to be one thing that is bigger than everything and which created all other things. Something doesn’t simply emerge from nothing, or some kind of singularity that is trapped in an endless cycle of exploding and contracting again. I think that’s quite a poor, lazy explanation.”

Christopher: “Some would say that God is an even poorer, lazier explanation. Why does there have to be something bigger? The Universe seems to work just fine without God.”

Me: “Then who is stirring the soup?”

Christopher: “What soup? What are you talking about?”

Me: “I like to think of the Universe as a big pot of soup. The pot probably wouldn’t fit into the cupboard near the sink with the others, being of infinite size and all, but someone has to stir the soup nonetheless, and perhaps adjust the heat from time to time.”

Christopher: “How ridiculous. So there is a God doing all of this? What does He look like?”

Me: “I don’t know that they are a ‘He’. Maybe they are a ‘She’? Personally I don’t think they are either, after all what would be the point? It’s not like they are going to be out on the dating circuit or something. As for what they look like, if they are bigger than everything, you would have to take quite a few steps back to get them all into frame. Perhaps 10^83598 of them or even further away if you don’t have a suitable wide-angle lens.”

Christopher: “So what does this God do with ‘their’ time?”

Me: “Study their creations I guess, and design new ones. Especially the more mobile, sentient ones, like us. But I obviously don’t have a clue, it’s probably impossible to ever know, and I think it always will be unless you are somehow granted an audience with them after you die at some point, and no one can possibly know that for sure either.”

Christopher: “Why would He only take an interest in the sentient beings?”

Me: “Well they are gifted with imagination, so they are also capable of acts of creation, just on a much smaller scale. Maybe that’s the whole idea, to outsource creation in a way, then pop in sometimes to see how it’s all going, and check out what has been created so far.”

Christopher: “What kind of God are we talking about? Vengeful? Destructive? Benevolent?”

Me: “Quite benevolent I would say. Bad things do happen, sometimes on a massive scale, but they’re pretty rare in all, and don’t seem to be the result of a bad temper, more just a turn of natural or man-made events while their back is turned. God can’t be everywhere at once.”

Christopher: “Well actually, people believe He can, it’s called omnipresence. What about all the bad things that happen to good people? Like innocent babies getting sick and dying, or a nice young couple who perish in a sudden car accident?”

Me: “Well if God spent all their time just looking out for innocent people, then everyone would get wise to that and just go around being completely innocent all the time, and I expect even God would get a bit bored with the extreme lack of variety. I know I would.”

Christopher: “So what do you think of organised religion? Have you tried it at all?”

Me: “I think it’s fine to have a solid framework for belief, as long as the hierarchy, rules and dogma aren’t too far out of whack. But I haven’t really tried any of it.”

Christopher: “Give me an example of ‘out of whack’.”

Me: “Islam has a very good framework, with a noble prophet, the hierarchy seems workable, and the dogma and rules, while sometimes quite dodgy concerning women and waking people up in the morning, seem to work out OK for the most part. Christianity also has a very good framework, and a great central figure, but the hierarchy is quite mental, and not at all humble and kind, as it’s prophet would want. Also the dogma is far, far out and the rules are historically a bit insane and brutal, and everything that Jesus taught, has been interpreted in an extremely detailed and imaginative, but totally barking mad way. I’m really not sure what Jesus would make of the whole thing these days, he might feel like changing his name. Buddhism has one of the coolest prophets of all, and the hierarchy is almost non-existent, but the dogma and rules seem like a lot of work, especially if you’re a Shaolin monk, very rewarding I’m sure, and they always seem healthy and happy, but it’s just not for me, unless I could just be some fat guy sitting under a tree all day, and that was somehow good enough for them. That seems to be the one people cherry pick the most though, as it has all the transcendence and meditation and mindfulness stuff, which is pretty handy after a difficult day. I don’t know about Hinduism or Judaism at all really, so I couldn’t comment, and I never bothered looking into the more obscure or unknown (to me) ones, like Zoroastrianism or Taoism or Scientology or anything like that.”

Christopher: “It sounds like you have almost invented your own religion, although most others would call you blasphemous and insolent.”

Me: “If I have, then it’s a very basic one. There’s no hierarchy, at least not in the physical sense, and literally no rules or dogma at all, outside of “try to be cool to others”. If I’m being blasphemous, then I want to ask, who is getting offended? I’m willing to bet that it’s the religious hierarchy itself, with all its rules, God probably doesn’t give a toss about any of it. Why would God be so easily offended by stuff like that?”

Christopher: “At last, a good point, do try to keep it up. What do you think happens after we die?”

Me: “I don’t think that souls are disposable, single-use items, we wouldn’t really have time to learn anything really useful in one lifetime, so I believe in reincarnation. I think we have to sit alone in silence for a good long while after we die, and think over the events of our lives and the actions we took, perhaps getting a wee tea break now and again. Then when we’ve finally become enlightened by it all, we go to somewhere that seems familiar and comfortable that we knew from our time alive, to learn all we can about the Universe, and chat with any others we want to, and learn from them too. My place will probably be in an amusement arcade, which is located on a giant space station (a bit like Deep Space 9). There will be a quiet room off to one side, where I can use a cosmic computer to check on the living, and follow current events, and perhaps influence things ever so slightly, with enough effort or skill applied. When I have eventually learned and chatted enough, and beaten all my high scores, it’s time to be born again, somewhere else, perhaps on a completely different planet, where I would of course, forget the whole lot, but it would all be recorded by my soul, ready for the next cycle of understanding.”

Christopher: “Alright. I think I’ve heard enough. You are literally an idiot, and you talk bollocks. Why I am wasting my time with you, I just don’t know. Please leave.”

Me: “Um, we’re inside my head, so I’m not sure exactly where I can go, but fair dinkum. Cheerio then.”

Christopher: “Just go, I don’t care how.”

Me: “I seem to remember this conversation with Christopher Hitchens going a lot better the previous t..”

Christopher: “What???”

Me “Oh, sorry.”

Christopher: “Fuck off.”


I seem to remember this conversation with Christopher Hitchens going a lot better the previous time we had it. I might have just caught him on a bad day. I can’t really remember him being so disagreeable last time. I think the conversation was also a lot more coherent and detailed, and my ideas were more interesting and well defined, but I might be completely mistaken, and I was likely going through a manic episode.

I can’t exactly call him to find out how it went originally, even if I could, he would still not have a clue who I was, or what I was talking about, the “original” conversation also being a figment of my imagination. It’s really a lose-lose situation I suppose, with little to gain or even learn from any of it. Perhaps we’ll talk another time. He doesn’t really seem that keen though, so I’ll definitely leave it for a while.

3 Likes

Atheism is willful blindness / denialism hiding itself as extreme skepticism (which is also unjustified but may seem to be more palatable to the average intellectually-minded person).

2 Likes

That story doesn’t really reflect my beliefs, I wrote it quite some time ago when I was drunk or high.

I personally think atheism is a lack of imagination. Whether or not the Universe is infinite (I think it is), then what the JWST is showing is that it just goes on and on, even the probabilistically tiny part of it we can currently see.

I don’t believe in “intelligent design” as such, more “intelligent rules”. Think if you were God, you have a few choices: you could either spend all your time creating new worlds and species, new arrangements of matter, or you could just create the rules that affect all matter and then see how it all works out. I think it’s the latter.

The Universe is an incredibly efficient place, there is actually very little waste or even repetition. Everything is recycled. From a leaf decaying on the forest floor and giving nutrients back to the soil, to a star dying and spreading all that matter to create new planets and stars:

These deaths are crucial: supernovae create and scatter heavy elements like carbon, oxygen, and iron—essential for planets and life—into space, seeding future star and planet formation.

It’s all just such a beautiful system, that I think only God can be responsible at the end of the day. The Abrahamic religions only seem to focus on the creation of Earth, and mankind, as if that was the be all and end all in an infinite Universe. I like to think bigger than that. I remember the first time I read the Quran, and this is at the very start of it:

“All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of the worlds.”

That got me all excited, “worlds!”, but then it was all a bit downhill from there.

I think we are all connected to a wider Universe, and our consciousness transcends Earthly bonds. We are receiving signals all the time from the great beyond, but we need to be more in tune with our souls to actually listen to them.

Or perhaps I’m just delusional, but I’ll take the delusion over the anguish of Christianity any day, which is what I was brought up with.

1 Like

A real conversation with Hermann Hesse( if I may)

The day was yesterday, not totally unlike any other day,

Needed money.Been saving coins that I kind of knew I would not spend, because number 1 I could hide it in my jeep, and number two, I would be reluctant to put it into the coins for cash machine in the market because they subtract 15 percent interest. I had 300 dollars in coins . So on 300 I would only net out 265.

So I thought I need the money because my Christopher medal’s chain was in pawn and the deadline to either pay the renewal or take it out was on the next day.

So, I went into the market and found the coins to cash machine out of service.

But I remember that I opened a new account with Wells Fargo the previous day perhaps having a kind of feeling which prompted me to do it, and because it was near the market, I carried the coins to the bank. I proceeded to ask if they could

change them into greenbacks, and they replied,”unfortunately we can not, but you can , take it home and wrap them with the coin wrappers we can give you.”

Then I replied that I need the money now , I did’nt tell em what for,

So they let me sit in a chair there was a table there as well, and I proceeded to start to wrap, which I thinking would take a short time, turned out to be at least an hour and a half.

So I got it all wrapped up, but I wasn’t done yet, as I soon was going to find out.

I went up to the same teller who gave me the wrappers, and I told him I’m done, and expressed my surprise on finding the exact number of wrappers he gave me was the same as was needed for the wrap. I thought what the.

So there was 300 dollars, so I thought I’d surprise him by asking him how much he made per hour working here at the ban, and he wouldn’t say.

So I told him I was grateful they let me wrap in the bank, in full view of customers, (they asked among themselves if I could do it in a cubicle and the boss said no) .

So then I told him, the same teller, whose name I asked but he said he didn’t wear it that day- that by allowing me to work with the coins there, I made 60 dollars, and he seemed puzzled, as I explained about the coinstar in the market and I would have been charged 15 % , and he was kind of amazed I would talk that way.

WHY WAS HE AMAZED

The previous day the account was opened, it was the manager with whom a sudden realization happened: I looked disheveled that day, even afraid to look into the mirror that morning, because of how I feared I would look by others,

So meeting this young petite manager, I noticed something about her which struck me as kind of strange. I thought she had Indian airs about her, and alluded this to her. She was very surprised at this, and asked me how could you know, and yes my parents are from India, and do an accent made you think that?

I said no, some gestures made me think so, since I’ve been to Calcutta, and instinctively suspected.

“Oh” she responded, Have you been there recently and the usual back and forth. I told her we went to Calcutta, then took a 24 hour drive to Kathmandu, and Lumbini, the birthplace of The Buddha., but to get back from this diversiveness to Damian.

I didn’t relate this incident with his boss to Damian, so briefly chatting with him while he placed the now neatly arranged coins into his teller’s drawer, but did mention to him the coincidence with Hesse’s Damian, who was popular during the period in the United States when the so called New Left developed from it’s early beatnik days of coffee shops, poetry readings and social gatherings within. It was a reaction by Alina’s young men who were not drafted into military service for some reason, or evaded such by merely skipping towns, or manufacturing such illnesses as did in fact prevent them from being drafted.

So, Damien surprised me , nearly nocking my socks off , judging from his appearance, bearing an expression , a mixture of surprise and subduing common understanding , that yes, it was the same Hesse I had in mind, not sure if it was himself or me he was referring to.

I left elated by thinking, I will have no need to feel odd by coin counting any more, although, he was definitely not the friend I was hoping for all my life, because he was almost two generations before me, he could almost be my son, even my grandson.

2 Likes

You may, you may. That’s brilliant.

Christopher Hitchens: So many relgious nuts on this forum. Why don’t they fuck off to some religious nut forum?

Och Vic, did you read it? Do you think it was meant to be taken seriously? :winking_face_with_tongue:

So-called ‘atheism’ is a ‘lack of imagination’? Oh right. Saying, ‘Oh, that seems complicated, ‘god’ must have done it’ REALLY shows a lot of imagination :laughing:

If there are infinite universes, which there may well be, then there are also infinite universes that are NOT conducive to life or even matter, so no ‘fine tuning’ for those universes, apparently :roll_eyes:

Like I mentioned before further up, I think God did everything right at the start and just rolled with it. I don’t think He created humans specifically, or anything else for that matter. I don’t think about God much at all, but I believe He/She exists. Why does that offend you so much?

I’m not asking you to follow a religion, or even believe in God, it means nothing to me if people do or not, really.

That’s why I would have actually like to have had a conversation with Hitchens, as someone who believes in God, but that is as far as the fucks are given.

I understand if you are frustrated with the Bible thumpers and Quran slappers that tell you that you’re inferior because you don’t believe what they do, that’s ridiculous. But don’t throw me in with them, because outside of the belief in God, I have nothing at all in common with them, and care not a jot what other people believe.

I’m not trying to sell anything. I just tell stories sometimes and God is mentioned.

You are the one who said that ‘atheism’ shows a ‘lack of imagination’. That’s the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard. It shows the exact opposite. ‘God’ is a character in an old book. As far as I am aware that character was male. If you believe in ‘something else’ then you are an ‘atheist’ yourself. The word came into existence SPECIFICALLY for those who didn’t believe in ‘God’, because that was rare and taboo at the time.

1 Like

It doesn’t mean that atheists have any less imagination, just in that regard. Don’t be so sensitive.

In what regard? How is it ‘unimaginative’ to not believe in ‘God’? I’m actually really surprised that you believe in ‘God’.

I liked when Herman Hesse said no man has ever been himself. That stuck with me back in the day. Or maybe that was Henry Miller who said that? No, pretty sure it was Hesse.

It is a stupid statement. It implies that if someone doesn’t believe in God, then they have an inferior imagination, which is obviously not true.

I retract it fully.

Satisfied?

You must have thought it to say it in the first place. You sound as if you are having a tantrum and don’t mean what you are saying.

Are you the fucking thought police now?

Happens sometimes.

No. I was just making an observation. I wasn’t telling you what your thoughts should be.

But then your statement is also a bit stupid: “You must have thought it to say it in the first place.” That goes for everything I say while conscious, and everyone else for that matter.

Christopher Hitchens wrote about Mother Teresa and “her crimes against humanity” and all the money that good people have given has simply been spent on a building a monument to Catholic fundamentalism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z79t5hcgn3w