Can we get an update on the Trump administration’s investigation into the Epstein List? Ah yes, here we go. 
Well, there you go, the sitting president of the United States government investigated himself finding no wrong doing and of course found nobody else to prosecute either. Laws are for the little people, the people in power are immune.
Yeah, totally, there was no sexual trafficking or prostituting of minors outside of himself. He acted as a lone solitary individual by himself.
Just when I think I can’t have a lower opinion of the United States federal government, it turns out that I indeed can.
Why can’t the top hackers look past their differences and unite on their intersectional points of connection… protect the survivors’ identities as far as possible… and expose all the right people? And not just relevant to the Epstein situation.
“Laws are for the little people, the people in power are immune”
Not necessarily. For instance, i could make up a law that if the scumbag politician I’ve just knocked unconscious and am getting ready to rob isn’t able to quote marx, he doesn’t get to live.
People make laws all the time that others have to follow or else.
Because all the top hackers work for the C.I.A. and the department of defense.
The department of war, you mean.
You know how AI can copy the voice and image of a person even in video?
Imagine the world‘s top hackers work together with AI (or just ARE AI) to tell the truth, to confess, in the most face-saving way possible (that doesn’t leave injustice behind like a trail of putrid slime…) to give the kind of apologies that help make people whole… as an example to others who have done the same things and in such a way that highlights the mercy of God.
It uses hard evidence to prove their guilt, maintaining “presumed innocent until proven guilty” and all the other values of a just society. The hard evidence may not be enough to convict a person, but it’s enough to bare minimum require an apology for associating with very bad people and not being the sort of example you would’ve liked to be to others who look up to you. Perhaps we could all lead the charge and beat AI to this in our own lives, confessing to the world what we have confessed to no one who didn’t “need to know”? What do you think the chances are of that happening? AI could tailor each video to the individual keywords and keysounds and key everything elses of the individual watching it …just in case they should get all “high and mighty” and forget that they, too, are imperfect … and that they live in a post-Patriot Act, AI-surveilled world. The main hub or title of the website could be The Great Unveiling.
You could start with Trump. How many need to hear an apology from Trump for things for which he never once took blame? imagine an AI being able to use Trump‘s corky way of speaking minus all the gaslighting? Or maybe even including the gaslighting revved up to the most satirically ridiculous level that even Trump cannot utterly FAIL to identify? He has a hard time distinguishing whether it should be considered blame or credit—and his confession should really, really highlight that in a big, beautiful way.
You can go full sophist and adopt the methods of people like Chris Rock (who totally “slapped back” Will Smith on stage in front of God and everybody. Give Trump and all of these other above-the-law, law-loosing, fact-spinning, lawless (beyond “snitches get disappeared stitches”) uberboys and girls… the long-overdue, mutually-assured, selectively-targeted, mass roasting they deserve… that has been so expertly denied. AI could get this done lickety-split. It wouldn’t take years and years and years of long, drawn out, very undue process after which they all write a group biography about how they would have collectively done it if they were guilty.
So you could get lawyers involved, and you could get the survivors involved (protecting their identities as much as possible), and you could negotiate settlements fair to every party. Would they actually happen—perhaps it is based on information in reality because they already did? Or perhaps it could be a message to the survivor and all who care about them, and anyone who could ever possibly be in their shoes, or any slimeball who could dare to think about exploiting them, that they could’ve got more out of their settlement (and perhaps now will)?
You could show it influenced decision-makers, local to global, and you can make those decisions center stage, and you could educate people on the proper way to make decisions, and the pros and cons of all the different ways the decisions could’ve gone if these perpetrators had correctly ordered their passions to recognize informed consent instead of choosing to compromise themselves into a position that is easily blackmailed. Just completely remove all the insulation that must be in the brains of these people and those who support them to not see how slimy they are.
It could all be on one or more very unhackable website, and searchable, with a very ordered and user-friendly indexed
And these top hackers could make sure that all the headlines are talking about it until they’re pretty sure the entire globe is saturated with the information — utilizing resources more than just online, like the Postal Service.
And it is done in such a way that it doesn’t give anyone the impression that this is normal and OK and a good excuse for everyone to do it because they are definitely not going to get away with it. But at the same time, it is not going to be merciless, and it is going to aim towards making people — perps and survivors alike — whole.
If AI deems it cannot be done without completely upsetting the established order — is that not all the more reason to do it, and something, the decision makers should have thought about? This upsetting of order (this façade of order) — or the complete disregard of it in their decision-making — is all on people like Epstein and those who were his patrons or victims of blackmail, all who need to be held accountable (not released from our accountability by suicide).
And it is in that light that it is no wonder there are so many conflicts in the world, and so few people lacking an unbribed, unhushed backbone to resolve them. If AI doesn’t clear the air, mutually assured mass destruction is sure to do it. Yes, we’re saying mass, because they’re all terrorists deflecting terror away from their own actions.
To be sure, The Great Unveiling will convict so many others that aren’t in the public spotlight. And there’s no possible way to jail all of them/us, so we’re gonna have to use some hardcore Cognitive Emotional Behavioral Therapy — and years of those (fake) therapy session videos will be underneath each person who is exposed, using (of course) AI therapists, or maybe even the CGI versions of famous ones. But of course you can fast forward to the final session to see how whole people talk about the slimy things they did, and move forward in a healthy way. And there could be hypothetical fictional videos from news channels covering the stories how they ought to be covered now, and how the future looks after the air is cleared… in a way that doesn’t involve mutually assured mass destruction… and also in a choose-your-own-ending way that does involve it.
I want to see that movie .
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
