aniceguyposts

[aniceguy]

When I have my child, if I do…no words, no language…only grunts and reality…he will know what is what…sticks and stones…the deepest philosophical or empirical truths begin with a dismissal of language and sitting on a tree with a stick, flinging shit and grunting…forget the overman…the chimp-man…10 bananas is a better answer to your questions than 5 bananas…sticks and stones…and shit flinging…what you can see flying in the air is the truth and all else is a delusion…21st century Canadian by the way…
by the way::: do you know the only absolute??? blind people know NOTHING. if they never saw a tiger and somebody explained it to them through ‘words’…they will think its a cabbage…or something…words,schizophrenia,9/11…bananas…

[aniceguy]

In my opinion - returning to the case of Schopenhauer - is that he was infected/affected by an eastern strain, identified as Buddhism.
Buddhism is to Hinduism what Abrahamism is to…Hellenism.
The issue is an absence of accessible frontiers, creating a “Behavioural Sink” scenario.
Life must survive, by any means…and nobility, intelligence, or even dignity is not its primary goal and will be sacrificed if need be.

The kook is too funny, he sees connections and proofs of his insane word-salads everywhere…because…he really sees proofs and connections everywhere, in his schizoid head…
how is Buddhism connected to Hinduism? is India not an overpopulated country? is Hinduism in decline there because of it and are people suddenly becoming more and more Buddhist??? if anything, its the opposite and as the overpopulation became a larger and larger problem, since the British left, the nationalistic, ‘neo-nazi’(quite literally) and Hindu tendencies progressively intensified…was the post-Roman Northern Europe an overpopulated sink-hole, brimming with people like China?, or was it an empty land full of forests and individualistic tribes???and yet, Christianity spread there very successfully…lets look at China, where Buddhism did not penetrate…out of…the vaastly overpopulated Tibetan mountains and Mongol deserts…China had a massive population for thousands of years and yet…no Buddhism…pagan, folk religion…and in the Tibet, with fuckall people or in the Mongolian steppe with fuckall people…Buddhism has been doing well for thousands of years…fucking waste of time kook liar…he is finding thousand new ways to revive the old neo-nazi tripes that the neo-nazis stuffed his paranoid kooks head with…Christianity is a slave religion, that emerged in an overpopulated and degraded Roman slums and became an opium of the masses…typical neo-nazi lie and completely untrue…but the kooks will find 100 ways to imply it is completely true, despite it simply not being true…

[aniceguy]

Also…the kook forgets one thing…Hinduism(as we know it now) and Buddhism emerged at around the same time…and during the appearance of Buddhism, Hinduism was having a golden age itself…and the kook also forgets that we dont actually know the extent of influence on Ancient Greeks of other civilisations like the Persian Empires and so forth because no written text was then practised(before Plato)…so unless he wants to claim he can prove Ancient Greeks were the only civilisation which was not heavily influenced by its neighbouring civilisations…we have to contend that the Persian culture, aswell as other Levantine cultures, had a very serious influence on Ancient Greece…just like every other known civilisation was heavily influenced by its neighbours and predecessors…but the neo-nazis cant contend that brown Arabs and Jews had an influence on their pure origins…no,no,no…

[aniceguy]

Look at the logic of these neo-nazi lying cunts…and pay attention because these are the same sophisms and the same schemes as the far-left commies use to undermine the Western civilisation…when Nazism arose in Germany…from a minor, niche party of traumatised soldiers, racists and other wackos with revolutionary tendencies to being voted into power by a majority…and when this even coincided with both the Germanies sore defeat in WW1, the lose of Germanies Central European dominance, hyperinflation, demoralisation, communism spreading, degeneracy…this was an echo of noble and Ancient instinct…but when Christianity arose…you know the story…no thinking allowed in this circus, in this autistic church of holy, 40 year old virgins …

[aniceguy]

lol

[aniceguy]

A Europe without Christianity?

The world of classical antiquity shone as a lamp in the dark, filled with a youthful vigor that ensured its institutions and ideas would endure long after Greece and Rome ceased to exist as viable political entities. Science and reason were then snuffed out by the darkness and imbecility that followed in the wake of Christianity. Libraries were destroyed; art treasures were smashed; building in non-perishable materials almost vanished from memory; personal hygiene disappeared; ignorance was considered a virtue; chaos ensued. This was the triumph of Christianity, a syphilis of the mind that nearly wiped out Western civilization. Although Christian power and influence were shattered long ago by the rediscovery of science and reason, a resurgent Christianity now dominates the West in the form of liberal egalitarianism and cultural Marxism. These philosophies serve as the ideological basis of endless mass Third World immigration and other multiculturalist policies. This neo-Christianity has been imposed on the West by totalitarian liberal-leftist governments.

Understanding Christianity through the prism of group evolutionary strategy can shed light on the significant threat the religion poses to Europeans. As a seminal concept originally formulated by Prof. Kevin MacDonald, it was used with devastating effect in his analysis of 20th century Jewish intellectual and political movements. In a world characterized by in-group ethno-racial preference, absence of a group evolutionary strategy allowing populations at the species and sub-species level to survive and replicate is highly maladaptive.

A group evolutionary strategy is defined as an “experiment in living.” This refers to the establishment of culturally mediated processes or ideological structures that allow humans to exercise control over natural selection at the group level. The basic characteristics of Jewish evolutionary group strategy are:

1.) the rejection of both genetic and cultural assimilation into neighboring populations. Jews in Europe and the Middle East segregated themselves from gentiles by fashioning a distinct identity for themselves. This was accomplished through enforcement of strict endogamy and residential segregation. The genetic relatedness between Jewish groups, such as the Sephardi and Ashkenazi, is higher than between Jews and European populations because of this age-old resistance to assimilation; 2.) successful economic and reproductive competition that has driven Europeans from certain sectors of their own societies (such as finance); 3.) high ethnocentrism; 4.) within-group altruism favoring Jews at the expense of outgroup members, and; 5.) the institutionalization of eugenic practices that selected for high intelligence and conscientiousness in Jewish populations.

In contrast, Christianity undermines group survival by suppressing natural ethnocentric tendencies and maximizing the spread of dysgenic traits. Christianity provides no effective barrier to the cultural and genetic assimilation of Europeans by surrounding non-white populations; for example, during the Spanish and Portuguese colonization of the Americas in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Roman Catholic Church aggressively promoted miscegenation among the conquistadores. Ecclesiastical officials encouraged the European colonists to marry and interbreed with their native Indian and African concubines. This resulted in large-scale demographic genocide, which replaced European genetic homogeneity with mestizaje.

That Christianity is a non-ethnocentric ideology based on moral universalism is another serious problem with the religion. Europeans will always champion the interests of hostile out-groups at the expense of fellow Europeans in the name of Christian love and brotherhood. Christianity also opposes the high aggressiveness directed towards outgroup members; instead, believers are expected to practice nonviolence and compassion in the face of demographic replacement. High aggressiveness is a defining feature of Jewish group evolutionary strategy. It has allowed Jews to outcompete Europeans in their own societies.

Lastly, Christianity is militantly anti-eugenic, which is why it allows weaklings to survive and reproduce. This has decreased average IQ and the prevalence of other beneficial traits in European societies. In contrast, Jewish group evolutionary strategy institutionalizes eugenic practices that positively select for these traits, especially high intelligence. These eugenic practices have allowed Jews to exercise a degree of influence over Western societies vastly disproportionate to their actual numbers. Unlike Judaism for Jews, Christianity does not function as a group evolutionary strategy for Europeans, but as a recipe for racial and cultural suicide on a massive scale.

All aggressively pro-active measures against Christianity are certainly ethically justifiable in the face of Western decline and European racial extinction. In this essay, a more scientific approach is recommended. The European intellectual, before he devises any plan of action, must first acknowledge that no other biological process is as important for humans as evolution through natural selection. If he is to have any belief-system, it must be the civil religion of eugenics. Incorporating eugenics into the fabric of civic life would obviate coercion, making racial hygiene a matter of voluntary acquiescence. He would also do well to embrace the trifunctional worldview of the ancient Indo-Europeans.

For many thousands of years, trifunctional ideology served as an effective deterrent to the pathology of moral universalism. By envisaging the tripartite caste system as the fundamental pillar of a new order, the iron law of inequality is exalted as the highest law, the one most conducive to the achievement of social harmony. In this vision, the highest caste, equivalent to the brahman of Aryan-occupied India or the guardians of Plato’s Republic, would be absorbed in scientific and technological pursuits for their own sake. They would be entrusted with the material advancement of civilization. Their moral system, informed by the principles of evolutionary biology and eugenics, would be derived from the following axiom:

What is morally right is eugenic, i.e. improves the race biologically;

what is morally wrong is dysgenic, i.e. degrades the race biologically.

The second class of individuals will be bred for war and the third will consist of industrial and agricultural producers. These correspond to the Aryan kshatriyas and vaishyas or the “silver” and “bronze” castes of Plato’s Republic. Since these individuals do not possess the cognitive ability to participate in the highly abstract civil religion of the brahmans, they will worship their distant ancestors as the racial gods of a new religion founded on eugenic principles.

Christianity is an irrational superstition, which means that its influence will not be mitigated through logical argument. The child-like simplicity of Christian dogma is “a feature, not a bug.” Without an ability to appeal to the lowest common denominator, Christianity would not have spread as rapidly as it did during the 4th century. An enlightened European humanity, educated in the principles of Darwinian evolution and eugenics, cannot co-exist side by side with this ancient Semitic plague. The negative correlation that exists between Christian religiosity and intelligence simply reinforces this conclusion. Christianity is a seemingly intractable problem for primarily eugenic and biological reasons. Although a eugenic approach is clearly needed, other things must be done. If Christianity is to be abolished, all state-sanctioned programs of multicultural indoctrination must be completely eliminated along with it.

Through a program of rigorous eugenic breeding and media control, Europeans will be weaned from the neo-Christian ethical system they have imbibed since childhood. They will come to see eugenics as a necessary form of spiritual transcendence instead. Through a process of evolutionary development that is both culturally and technologically mediated, the lowest castes will embrace the brahman civil religion and see themselves as gods; the more evolved brahmans will move on to a more intensive contemplation of increasingly sophisticated mathematical and scientific abstractions. This progressive development of European racial consciousness will ensure the adoption of a successful group evolutionary strategy among Europeans.

The gradual phasing out of individuals with IQs below 100 will be carried out as an act of religious devotion among the lower castes. Aryan kshatriyas, the “knights of faith” of the new Aryan race religion, will impose a eugenic regime over the entire globe, repopulating the Third World with highly evolved super-organisms that will turn these former hellholes into terrestrial paradises. Wasting precious material resources caring for less evolved members of the human species will be a thing of the past. Humanity, whose scientific and technological progress stagnated during the late 20th century, will once again resume its upward journey toward the stars.

Eugenic breeding will force Europeans to realize the truth of Nietzsche’s core insight: Christianity, a transvaluation of all values driven by ressentiment, is a slave morality. It is the revolt of the underman against the aristocratic Indo-European virtues of strength and magnanimity, pride and nobility. By repudiating the syphilitic poison of Christianity, Europeans will become a race of value-creators, once again in charge of their own destinies as they affirm the beauty of life in all its fullness.

what the
fuck
such a bizarre ride…reads like a motivational letter hehe, notice the complete chaos and confusion in thinking…who are the out-group members he is talking about? he is talking about the ‘European’ race when, for him and unwittingly, European race is equated to the countries where Catholicism spread the earliest…whilst mixing literal conceptions of race fabricated by the Nazis(which are much more nationalistic than biological) with the Darwinistic concept of race(something completely different) and adding his own ‘ideas’ about what the European race is(neither the Nazi or the Darwinistic race)…the autistic neo-nazi morons cant even properly systemize their own thought yet spout sentences like:By envisaging the tripartite caste system as the fundamental pillar of a new order, the iron law of inequality is exalted as the highest law, the one most conducive to the achievement of social harmony.
such beautiful visions…there should be an elite doing its own thing, deciding who to breed, who to destroy…humanity should simply hand its freedom over its own thoughts, actions, reproduction to an elite of autistic virgins who already have all the answers…let the autistic genius elite decide the beatiful direction the humanity should head…such beautiful vision…

[aniceguy]

Who are the most ‘Aryan’ people in Europe…wait for it…wait for it…Ukrainians and Poles…lol…you dont believe me, check the genetic make-ups and see where those ‘Aryan’ genes occur the most and least…you fucking dim-wits have no idea what you are spouting shit about…
check this shit out: eupedia.com/europe/Haplogro … -DNA.shtml
I AM THE MEMBER OF THE UPCOMING SUPER RACE HAHAHAHA WTF!!! AS ARGUED BY NEO-NAZI YANKS!!!

[aniceguy]

eupedia.com/europe/Haplogro … -DNA.shtml
Check the Aryan genes in Greece!!!the Darwinists would like to have a word with the neo-nazi Greek cunts and their homoerotic fag Nordic buddies!!!

[promethean75]

Nuh uh the most Aryan people in Europe are the Iraqi and Iranian people who migrate there.

[aniceguy]

you are confusing genes with linguistic families you moron, stop wasting my fucking time.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranian_languages
is not this
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_history_of_Europe
btw…Iranians could be pinned up to the European genetic race, as I have told the idiot neo-nazis plenty of times. but I am not into the genetics deep enough to really say since its a WAAAY more intricate and confusing topic than the simplistic racists believe.

[aniceguy]

The role of females is to live their lives and decide what being a female means for them, without cunts on the far-left or far-right deciding it for them and then using violence or propaganda to mind-fuck them into being what they want.

[aniceguy]

First of all…the story with the Franks and the nazis is not so obvious…when they were a niche party, they actually blamed the Franks for fighting heathens and spreading Christianity, even invented conspiracies to do so, blaming Franks of massacring and pillaging Germanic heathens(typical nazi hypocrisy) but when they went main-stream, they obviously began to appropriate every single thing as a Germanic national and racial supremacy. Hitler praised Schopenhauer, he praised Copernicus, and so forth…everything that could be pinned as a proof of their invented pseudo-racial superiority, he took and claimed it being so. If they had somehow won, they would have claimed all the great Frenchmen were of some secret origin, tied to Germany, just like the wackos on SHITYHSELF invent their own conspiracies to do the same exact thing…

[Pedro_I_Rengel (PZR)]

Yes, but Hitler’s way is not the only way.

As long as you can find some (necessarily) bullshit way to make the ‘white man’ seem superior, it’s kosher.

Hitler only did that because he wanted to go to war with France, which was rationalist-conservative at that point.

[Pedro_I_Rengel (PZR)]

What do you take us for, boy?

[Pedro_I_Rengel (PZR)]

Jesus.

[aniceguy]

ok buddy

[aniceguy]

Christianity must always remember that it is the religion of the “Logos.” It is faith in the “Creator Spiritus,” in the Creator Spirit, from which proceeds everything that exists. Today, this should be precisely its philosophical strength, in so far as the problem is whether the world comes from the irrational, and reason is not, therefore, other than a “sub-product,” on occasion even harmful of its development or whether the world comes from reason, and is, as a consequence, its criterion and goal. The Christian faith inclines toward this second thesis, thus having, from the purely philosophical point of view, really good cards to play, despite the fact that many today consider only the first thesis as the only modern and rational one par excellence. However, a reason that springs from the irrational, and that is, in the final analysis, itself irrational, does not constitute a solution for our problems. Only creative reason, which in the crucified God is manifested as love, can really show us the way. In the so necessary dialogue between secularists and Catholics, we Christians must be very careful to remain faithful to this fundamental line: to live a faith that comes from the “Logos,” from creative reason, and that, because of this, is also open to all that is truly rational.

[aniceguy]

Subjectivity is the mental prison a simpleton is condemned to suffer.
His lack of any ability o become objective, to transcend this mental limitation is what identifies him.

For example, unable to abandon his established convictions concerning other he will never question or doubt what he’s already decided about it.
Instead he will accuse the other of lying or contradicting himself, meaning that it isn’t the idiot’s convictions about other but the other who is responsible for this contradiction.
Such a mind can never improve itself, can never grow, because it fails to appreciate the source of the error in himself.
Furthermore, such minds are also prone to over-estimate self as a means of compensating for their intuited underestimation of themselves.
The degree of the overestimation indicating the degree of a lack of an objective self-awarness in relation to other.
This divergence is then projected upon the other, who repeatedly fails to validate the established conviction.

All of it is related to what I’ve said about projection and sympathy/antipathy, relative to empathy.
We all begin with the same foundation in self-awarness. This self-awarness establishes the standard by which we begin to evaluate what is alien, the mysterious other - emergent self-awarness.
The average mind remains there. His/Her method is the easy projection of whatever he’s discovered about himself/herself into another’s circumstances, imagining himself/herself in the other’s shows, so to speak, and how he/she would feel, what he/she would think and how she/he would cope.
This is the first stage.
To advance from it one would have to emotionally distance oneself from the plight of the other and eliminate himself from a final judgment and understanding.
A tweaking of degrees based on a precise, and honest, appreciation of oneself.
Other is not oneself in a different circumstance - this is a feminine way of understanding based on similarities, tending towards absolute uniformity; other is defined by its differences from self - differences of degree not of absolutes - and it is the differences that define other relative to self.
Self-knowledge is essential - objective, honest brutal self-knowedge. This self-knowledge acts as a standard, a sounding board to adjust divergence of other relative to self - both negatively and positively, the latter being more difficult to achieve than the former because it would require a recognition and appreciation of an other’s superior trait.
The antagonist/enemy must be evaluated objectively, otherwise defeating him will be impossible.
A misevaluation of other will fail to overcome it - recognizing how and if is also crucial.
It opens up a path to be taken, beginning with self-improvement, self-correction, self-control, and acceptance of what cannot be overcome - wisdom - but can only be endured, leading to a decision to find a new path based on what is attainable rather than ideal.

The natural proclivity to “err on the side of caution” has cultivated the masculine impulse to throw caution to the wind, and act, letting the chips fall where they will. It’s a strategy of masculine competitiveness, determining who can endure the highest risks so as to enjoy the highest rewards - see self-handicapping as fitness signaling.
Feminization means changing this fitness signalling to victim signalling - exploiting the parental instincts of man.
This is why females acquire the infantile, rounded form.
See, also, how victimhood is part of Abrahamism producing the hyperbolic compensation of claiming divine worthiness - choseness - or of knowing a occult secret no other can ever know other than through a mediating authority full of occult verbosity referring to nothing but more text.

schizoid word salad if there ever was one

[aniceguy]

Objectivity is knowing - not agreeing or liking, nor disliking - but knowing the merits of your enemy’s world-view.
Empathy is understanding - not sympathizing not antipathizing - but sharing in the feelings, motives, sensation of what you find most deplorable and/or nauseating.
Subjectivity is life’s normal condition - it is life relating with, judging, evaluating other; it is outward perception of otherness.
With the development of self-consciousness the possibility of objectivity begins - it is a perception, from a third person perspective, of other and of oneself.
As objectivity becomes increasingly sophisticated - advances towards a harmony with the world’s indifference - the mind can gradually triangulate other and self within environment, or in relation to an objective - either of the self or of the other - with minimal emotional automatic prejudices.

psycho-analytical and pseudo-psychological vomit. there is no magical objectivity…all human cognitive activity is subjective and then we can differentiate two types of the meta-subjective cognition: subjective and objective; first thing to do is to throw out the trivial distinction and assume that we are not dealing with lying and take the next step…what would be an objective cognition, besides the obvious, if there ever was one? and what would be its opposite, if we assume that cognition must work on a binary basis and there is nothing to be discussed besides these two words…is belief in a God objective? is accepting the mathematical propositions and working on them objective? what even is thinking? what even is cognition in this context? is is completely self-referential? or is it the outcome of its own processes? how does the external world factor into a supposed objectivity? for example: is belief in a god objective if the person believes but does not lie about God at all? I think this is a pretty nonsensical question and a worthless tirade…words are simple…and ambiguous…you dont orient yourself on definitions of words…its not like a dictionary where you simply look up a commonly accepted meaning of the word and move on…what is objectivity the idiot asks…then a simple answer…simple for a simpleton…what objectivity actually is is a tremendously complicated and difficult philosophical topic. show me one subjective person that does not flinch when it is burnt with fire…and then show me one objective person, that knows its objectivity is clean from all sources of subjectivity in its life…an arrogant manic moron.

[aniceguy]

Our knowledge of cognition is very rudimentary and it remain inaccessible to us almost completely, despite what the Yank generations washed in Freudianism, AI overestimation, quack Psychology, IQ research and so forth think. The charlatan speaks about this as if its obvious…we have not even conquered basic medical issues…yet the Yanks are already walking over human cognition.