aniceguyposts

This fantasy is not about actual people, hence why the neo-nazis neither feel any sense of identity or belonging or loyalty nor give a shit about harm and degradation done to these people and their physical reality. Like Hitlers deranged fantasies, they are purely abstract ideals and emotional ideas. There were never German Aryan super-race that existed as Hitler fantasized and then eventually admitted himself and if he ever managed to build his deranged empire, its foundation, its blood, would be a complete fantasy and hence the whole empire would be a fantasy.

A conspiracy is always kept vague. Smears, rhetorical questions, a historical snippet here, a shallow and pretentious moralization there…if you try to fight it with facts, you will not be met back with facts but either with an accusation of not ‘understanding’ or with ‘misunderstanding’ AS IF the burden to be concise and comprehensive is on the interpreter not on the proposer of ridiculous and grand narratives that he does not even define concretely and provide explanation and evidence behind that explanation for. And if all else fails…psychoanalysis(mind-reading) and mysticism(will over reason and spiritual ‘arguments’) will do.

Peace and good-terms cannot be achieved without both parties willing to bend their necks to truth.

If truth is maintained, a simple difference in preference becomes a thing that can be accommodated and well tolerated.

An idiot saying morality and optimality are an objective thing he can see and demonstrate to be true is his way of not having to say he believes his own morality and his own preferences are the only legitimate ones for everybody and for all the time being and the best too and all this of course on the factual grounds, he, like an idiot, believes finds some support anywhere except his own head.

Christianity is dying and barbarism is resurfacing because barbarity is the natural state of our species.

If you want to preach…at least become a preacher. What is a difference between being a random moraliser and a religious moraliser??? A religious moraliser does not hide the fact that he is moralising and is bound to others in his community, a bullshit peddler on the internet???he is free to let himself go as much as he wants, as long as he finds jagoffs weak and insane enough to tolerate his antics.

Christianity IS barbarism.
Secularism is Civilisation

A religious moraliser uses lies to justify his position, such as threats of damnation and promises that he cannot keep of a future state.
Others are more honest and appeal to reason.

You are an atheistic Yank liberal worshipper of scientism and being a member of a cult of scientism without even knowing you are. Reason and science has nothing to do with morality and its relationship with progress is shaky and on very thin ice yet you speak about as if its an obvious dogma…because to you and zealots like you, it actually is because of your belief in it and you being a part of this false religion(so you take it as self evident as a religious worshipper does). Secularism is just a code word for scientism and a grey mass of happy consumers who see nothing past their nose and whose only concern is gorging more and extending their life(because the cult of life is a part of the religion of scientism). Rationality is a virtue, but it cant replace religion and a rational person will admit this.

A religious dogma is not a lie…belief is, by definition, a mode of cognition that requires a lack of proof to be at your disposal and for you to act and think and feel despite it(and which arrogant atheistic Canadian flakes use much, much more than they even realise). If a preacher proclaims he believes Jesus was resurrected, he is not lying…if he claims he can prove it…then he is. So, the bible, or any other religious text, is not a lie, unless if it claims to be able to use rationality to prove its claims…if it interprets them(theology) or simply accepts them as true and self-evident based on an individuals belief in them then it is not a lie…not everything that is not an atheistic pile of steaming pretentious shit out of a liberal terrorists mouth is a lie kid

For all the idiots,you dont automatically explain every aspect of something by simply saying it evolved(simply saying it came around and evidently is present) and then, without explanation and elaboration, simply declaring why it apparently evolved. It is called circular reasoning and it is a logical fallacy where the assumptions lead to conclusions and conclusions lead to the assumptions because you begin with what you already assume to be proven whilst pretending to be trying to prove it.

Authority has nothing to do with reason. Authority is built on personal character that acquires its strength through its actions and the trust they built in others. A man speaking out of authority does not have to provide reasons, people listen to him because they trust him and they trust him because his life shows his conviction and fortitude in certain values. Jesus was such an authority because people followed him, not because of what he said, but because of how he lived and only then did he teach them, again, not out of reason but out of an authority his personal character acquired.

One way to win every argument is to argue it out with yourself only, always.

Idiot…dont talk about war and pain unless you have been to a war and you have suffered. Masses of grey dwarves throwing mud at the sacred. Pain is a disease and a Satans tool and war is good to those who have never experienced it.

No.
Sorry to crush your list of prejudices

You are never alone with schizophrenia

Belief is self deception.
“Faith is believing what you know ain’t true”, Mark Twain.

compelling argumentation, belief(faith) is not what it actually is defined as in the English language but as something that, completely incidentally, proves your opinions are right.
faith for everybody except haunted Canadian atheists - an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof.
faith for haunted Canadian atheists = lies. funny how the English dullards have two completely different words for the same thing, almost as if somebody is bullshiting here and that person is you. who are you trying to mindfuck wacko???me???

Blah, blah, blah.
How narrowly you look at the world.