You are wrong for many reasons and you contradict yourself and confuse terms with eachother but I appreciate your constructive input.
Of course, history records the opposite. Fascism and Nazism weren’t conceived to bring communists over to the rich man’s side, but to bring rich men over to the communist’s side.
I know there were many other confusions and contradictions, but that one was worth mentioning.
Stop writing sentences which reading of and trying to make sense of has the same sensation as driving a wooden spike 3 feet up your anus. Fascism is not Nazism…fascism can be a very functional and morally decent way of state and societal organisation as demonstrated by both Mussolini and Franko. And Communism is not some universal and exhaustive term…the Soviet Union before and after Stalins death were VASTLY different things, on many different and important levels. I will also admit that there was a more sensible and decent wing of the Nazi party, represented by figures like Goring and so forth…but the problem was Hitler and Führerprinzip and Führerprinzip is what all the Nazis willing-fully brought about, unlike the way Stalins rise to omnipotence which was accidental. The WW2 should have really ended in 41-or 42 the latest…all the death and carnage that followed was due to systemic omnipotence of Hitler, built into the system. And Stalin was 5 times the man Hitler could ever be, in cunningness, intelligence, organisational mind…everything except making loud and emotive speeches, meant for peasants to inspire themselves to drag themselves to death, in a name of some vague fantasy. Read Hitlers notes…he was a confused and uneducated charlatan who had very little clue on anything and yet very much to say on how everything was, is and ought to be…its insanity on paper.
Hitler might disagree with you there.
But, carry on.
You crazy kook.
Mussolini specifically wrote about how fascism was simply a realistic, achievable version of communism, identical in every way except strategy, and Franco wasn’t a fascist, even going as far as outlawing the fascist party.
Franco was a run-of-the-mill military dictator, with no particular ideology. Whatever worked and strengthened the state without posing a threat to it was what worked for him.
You are a pencil-neck Jew writing historically dishonest idiocies on the internet…Become a professor at some Western university…you will get to write convoluted and bizarre idiocies and you will get to lie about history and smear the Europeans freely, talking shit to the gullible and immature 18 year olds that go there…maybe some insecure white girl will let you fondle her tits in your office too??? nobody will beat the shit out you because the Jew is beyond criticism in these circles of cowards and wacko charlatans who run like rats, knowing that their futures depend on the states approval because universities are no longer independent institutions.
Mussolini:
Well, thank you for proving my point that he was not a fascist. Lol.
?
I’m a Jew intellectual driving a three foot spike up your anus.
Like I said, a difference in strategy. Communists, too, say the state eventually disappears. State ownership of ventures is a communist strategy, not a communist goal.
Of course, the Italian state under Mussolini did anyway own all ventures, in the sense that it appointed who ran them. No free venture could exist, as per proper communist dogma.
Mussolini:
This is why we will now and then hear promethean75 heiling Hitler and singing the praises of Il Duce.
This is not a secret, at least not to communists.
The Soviets, too, saw reason and took this route. The USSR was, already by the 50’s, a nationalistic, traditionalist and racial-centric institution.
Are you a complete nutter or just some kind of fucked up liar???
I’m just not intellectually dishonest, so my judgement is not clouded.
And? he is basically saying that it is impossible to ‘solve’ the real and ongoing problem of class warfare and its destructive potential to destabilise and destroy if a nation has not been properly defined and constrained(which is true). How do you address the class war?, you try to construct political system which is stable and which balances freedom with equality so that freedom does not lead to anarchy which leads to oppression and equality does not lead to socialism which leads to oppression. If you have people who have different racial/linguistic/national identities then class warfare(which occurs everywhere, at all times and remains a constant great danger to liberty and the state) explodes into a racial and cultural warfare(like in America currently) which is much less manageable and thus much more dangerous. This is communism now? These are opinions of Western liberals before Marx even coined the term and sociology existed.
The ignorant kooks of today have very little idea what the extent of Marxism and Communism was.
Bullshit Kike lie. If you fucking lie about history one more time, I will simply ignore you.
That’s the whole point. It is still all, at bottom, about class warfare. That is what communism is.
You can find he is right about it or not, it is still communism.
Just because you agree with it, doesn’t mean it is not communism, which you are now at least accepting it is.
Brilliant Jew observation.
Three foot spike up the ass brilliance.
what are you even talking about? you make zero sense bro. just because somebody accepts the fact of class warfare and wants to do something about it, knowing its dangers, means he is a communist? go get treatment.