Another set of fossils god planted in the soil...

Scientists find yet another “missing link”… and the news comes where else from? but… NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC

The TV station known to be funded by SATAN to make people trust thouse lying bastards called scientists and not THE WORD OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST and THE BIBLE which clearly says that man is made out of dirt and the woman was made later… from a rib

Funny thing though if the woman was made from a rib… why do males still have an even number of ribs ??? :open_mouth:
Oh but this is a question SATAN has planted in my mind to make me lose my faith in the allmighty…

So without further adue… BEHOLD; THE MISSING LINK… LINK… TO THE WEBSITE :confused:

news.nationalgeographic.com/news … minid.html

Also after minutes of research and google searches i myself found a MISSING LINK !!! which prooves the internet was created BY GOD in 6 days !!

tml.be/tmlani.gif

Let’s just look at that again:

Take my point? A few minutes spent on google proves precisely nothing. That you only spent a few minutes looking proves that your aim was not sincere, objective or logical, but dogmatic, single-minded and propagandist.

With respect to your post… I WAS REFFERING NOLY TO THIS LINK:
tml.be/tmlani.gif

And it was meant as a silly joke…

I read the other science journals every day.

Which ‘other science journals’? You wouldn’t have time to read them all - no one does.

Because i posted them all at once they may seem ALOT… but they’re ussualy written once every 2 weeks or so… so i get around to reading 2~3~4 a week.

If my threads “messed-up” the Natural Sciences forum… Please someone from the staff move them all together in 1 single thread.

Although all other threads sound like: “Evolution doesn’t make sense”, “young earth creationism”, “intelligent design”… and so on… which should not be here in the first place because such issues are not debatable in the scientifical world.

I also have an impressive collection of Documentaries on DVDs by people like Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan… + many more by a team of authors.

The point is that, rather than produce an intelligent argument, you spent 5 minutes rounding up ‘troops’ on google then spammed the forum. This is not the behaviour of a rational person.

Firstly, those threads have been going on for a lot longer than the time that you’ve been in this debate. Secondly, evolution is not a complete and absolute set of rules, even if we only consider science as a measure, so to deny discussion of them on a PHILOSOPHY forum ABOUT SCIENCE, when you’ve only been here for a pube’s width of time, is arrogant and overbearing. I’m not calling rank, but the fact is that you’ve primarily contributed angry posts that don’t use evidence or reasoning and often resort to personal insults, so you are not in any position to start legislating on what should and shouldn’t take place here. Maybe when you’ve contributed a bit more to ILP than aggressive mudslinging, assumptions and accusations then you can start making requests. But ILP is not here to make you feel like everything you believe is right and everyone else is wrong. In fact, I’d argue that ILP is here to do the precise opposite, to everyone.

The pointless and meaningless debates i’ve had here trying to convice irrational people of science FACT… made me nervous enough to become irrational for a brief moment :slight_smile:

And also… the fact that i’m new here doesn’t make me wrong nor does it make you right. Thats no arguemnts, sorry.

Not the point - if you’d turned up and been polite and not insulted people (including myself, so you can’t deny it) and not made every conversation into a reason why you hate religion then perhaps your request would be worth something. As it is, you’ve contributed very little then made a totally unrealistic demand. Why should the moderators here do anything other than ban your ass for causing trouble? They won’t, but that’s not because you don’t deserve it…

Totally unrealistic demand ? ?!?!

so you’re attached to a university, another kind of research insitute, or you’re just very rich, and you have nothing to do all day?

i mean, you pay for all these;
secure.nature.com/subscribe/nature

this one;
sciam.com/page.cfm?section=mag

and you know,… like, all these;
elsevier.com/wps/find/journa … e.cws_home

and many more…

and you read them?
nobody does all that :stuck_out_tongue:

  1. There’s a huge university library here
  2. I don’t need to pay for all those sites since many have free online articles; the only thing i do pay is a science magazine i get weekly in the mail here at my home.

thus, like most people who are interested or involved in science (including myself), you read a tiny fraction of the giant pile… and perticularily a fraction of the literatury of the subjects which interest you :wink:

correct me if i’m wrong :slight_smile:

It would be a waste of my time to read stuff that didn’t interest me. It’s a virtue to be able to rationaly select which information is correct and which is not and also a virtue to select the books which will expand your knowledge and which books will sink you in deeper into the “dirt we come from”.

of course… one comment though… based on books you can hardly make a judgement like ‘correct’ and ‘incorrect’ … imo, you could only judge it more or less ‘reliable’

depends on the book depends on the source…

dude Carpathian, you are thread-creating machine!

i did go a little over the top today… its just that yesterday and the day after i was so depressed and sick of people doubting the scientifical community over the gospels of others that i was close to giving up.