In this thread I’ll post the daily thoughts/observations that cross my mind mostly as I walk around/take a shower and do other such simple, casual daily activities which allow me to simultaneously wander off in my own mental world and, well, think about stuff.
The transition from verbal to physical conflict is an interesting subject I’ve been thinking about. Another interesting thing to notice is that it is rarely the other way around unless in a form of an apology.
Why does this transition occur? Why doesn’t it go the other way around?
Carefully observing a person in a verbal conflict can give away relevant traits of their character – pay attention to what they are saying, how they are saying it and their physical gesticulation.
You’ll notice that most conflicts transition from verbal to physical when a relevant trait of somebody’s character, something personal, something they hold dear and try to keep secret/unmentioned is exposed. The exposed one then, feeling vulnerable, seeks to avenge himself and obliterate the other, the one who exposed him at all costs. Feeling cornered, having no other recourse of action available to preserve his dignity, he temporarily loses control and descends down to the level of an animal, showing his true self, unrestrained by the fake human facade he otherwise puts forward.
Such people are closer to animals, more animalistic than other humans – they are usually of lower intelligence and shorter temper, allowing instincts/intuition/emotion guide them since they lack the higher faculty characteristic of more intelligent humans - reason.
Or is it a coincidence that more fights occur among the degenerate fans of the degenerate sport that is soccer than among the academics?
Or that more fights occur in places such as bars than in colleges?
I have never succumbed to the animalistic/physical conflict myself, nor did I ever provoke a person to such a degree that they would attempt to do that – such people are usually irrelevant anyway, as are their words and thoughts. Admittedly, I do remember an occasion when I had an emotional outburst. It was when I was called a loser once. The exact reason I had an outburst was that I thought of myself as one, so I felt exposed and saw no way to honestly counter-argument it – I was enraged, embarrassed and bitter. My introspection on that event is what provoked me to think about it and notice the similar pattern in other people as well.
After becoming intellectually honest with myself and seeking to improve myself and overcome my flaws instead of lash out on other people because of them I have become more acceptant of criticism and almost emotionally indifferent towards it. That’s the attitude one takes when one is intellectually strong, honest and independent.
It is those whose intellect is weak, who are dishonest and ignorant who will easily perceive the other as a threat.
A lion doesn’t care about a little kitty pestering him by gnawing and biting at its foot, trying to provoke him. He knows it is of no serious threat to him.
The little mouse feels threatened by almost everything, even the little kitty. It is small, with a fragile frame, easily torn apart… even by the kitty.
By now, the reason the transition rarely, if ever, goes the other way should be obvious - anyone can descend to the level of physical fighting… ascending back to a higher, more evolved state, the human state is not as easy. It is much easier to embrace the animalistic and the degenerate, and the animals and the degenerates are precisely the people who do it, and it is rare that such a person will ever improve themselves… they’re more likely to stay retarded for life.
(mod edit: title change)