Okay… I’m not receptive to the flirting, not gonna buckle, not gonna submit. If you want even a chance with me, then you know I said I wanted a Jewish Girl… being Catholic and all, this is expected, cause Catholic-Jewish dynamics in a relationship is a lifetime full of chuckles and fun.
That link up top is a course through the Mishna. You would do far better to post your daily explorations and personal insights of it here in this thread, as well as insights on side reading into Medieval Jewish Philosophy, your visits to a Synogague, and the new Yiddish words you use daily.
I want no excuses. If you want my uncircumcised cock, and the delights of poverty, you gotta earn it, not just be being in shape, with awesome hair and a hot face, but also gruelling studies into Judeaism, to convince me your worthy of my gentile cock. Anything less shows me your not taking me seriously.
No excuses or explanations why you can’t.
From now on, just keep all your Flirty talk in this thread, people are tired of reading it. Mix a little Yiddish in, Oh Daughter of Israel.
I WANT NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, FROM ANYONE IN HERE. I HOPE THAT THE PERSON TO WHOM I AM ADDRESSING THIS UNDERSTANDS MY MEANING.
YOU ARE NOW ON MY IGNORE LIST FOR YOUR NAUSEATING PM TO ME. I DID NOT THINK IT WAS ONE BIT FUNNY. IT WAS PORNOGRAPHIC TO ME. DO NOT EVER PM ME AGAIN. IT SHALL BE DELETED WITHOUT HAVING BEEN LOOKED AT AND IT WILL AGAIN BE SENT TO CARLEAS. I AM NOT INTERESTED IN YOU IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM AND YOUR POOR ATTEMPT AT PETTY DISGUSTING REVENGE WAS JUST THAT, PETTY AND DISGUSTING.
IT IS NOT YOU, STEVE, NOR IS IT HAHAHA, TO WHOM I AM ADRESSING THIS BUT I WANT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING FROM ANYONE IN HERE, EXCEPT FOR RESPONSES TO MY POSTS.
Well, we are now on the same page, Steve. To begin with, my flirting with you was about nothing more than making a connection with you. You read me all wrong and if I had been interested in the way you presumed me to be, I might have asked you to turn on your PM so I could have sent you a picture. I thought that I had made myself clear from weeks ago. A little flirting and friendliness does not make for a relationship though I did feel a connection. I am thoroughly disgusted right now which has nothing to do with you. If I have made you in the least uncomfortable, I apologize. You can trust that it won’t be happening again. If you come back to ilp and if there is ever any question of whether I am being overly friendly, as far as YOU are concerned, tell me, and I will regulate my behavior accordingly.
This will be my last private conversation with you in the open forum. I’ve had quite enough!!
Your statement is kind of ambiguous, iambiguous.
You might want to define what YOU mean by “flush” him…or not. But it goes without saying - feel free to do whatever you choose to do.
There are times when I think that we all need to flush ourselves a bit.
I was only being ironic. Especially given that Turd has actually created a thread calling for me to be banned. Unless he was only being ironic. But I don’t think so.
He has also “foed” me. And has claimed that, according to Aristotle, most of what I believe doesn’t even exist.
I think that Turd does know a lot about a lot of things. But most of it is really really obscure and of interest only to a tiny fraction of “scholars”.
And he doesn’t know jack-shit about the relationships that I tend to probe here. And [as with Satyr and his ilk] he avoids exploring them in the manner in which I propose like the plague.
What does he mean by this, if you understand what he’s saying?
Yes, I can agree with this. He read a lot even as a child. Hobos do take interest in many things besides making a good cup of coffee and riding the rails.
Maybe his real name then Is “Jude” not Steve.
What do you mean by obscure? Lost in transit long long ago or incapable of being deciphered?
Does that make them necessarily uninteresting or unworthy of being pursued - I’m talking about the things which he knows?
God is quite obcsure and yet people pursue that concept, that thing.
I rather think that obscure things could be interesting. Maybe that’s what this forum needs…conversations about much more obscure things from the past which haven’t been delved into.
He won’t discuss it. Instead, he has more or less decided that there are those here at ILP who are worthy of his time as a “serious philosopher” and those who are not.
I suspect another reason; but, as he has me on ignore, we won’t be able to go there either.
Apparently hobos don’t spend much time pondering the things – the relationships – that most preoccupy me. They simply dismiss them as not really existing at all. At least hobos like Turd.
I know nothing about Steve. I know nothing about Turd. I am only interested in what folks have to say here about the philosophical hole that I have dug for myself. In the other words, the precarious and fundamentally problematic nature of “I” as it relates to moral and political values. And thus the precarious and fundamentally problematic nature of value judgments and political ideals themselves as they relate to “I”.
But, admittedly, by “obscure” I mostly mean stuff that is of little or no interest to me. Other than as it might be made pertinent philosophically to the question, “how ought one to live?”
On the other hand, as you note:
This is certainly a good point. It’s just that I have reached a “place” in my life now where all that really holds my interest anymore are those things [relationships] that I tend to delve into here:
How ought one to live on this side of the grave? And how is this related to the manner in which they imagine their fate on the other side of it?
But this is no less embedded existentially in dasein. In the manner in which my own “lived life” has predisposed me to focus the beam [philosophically] here.
