the special master in the IQ45 document case, asked the IQ45 legal team
which documents were declassified, and the trump legal team refused
because of the legal liability in doing so…I.E… because they weren’t
legally declassified…
democraticunderground.com/100217173532
Kropotkin
the bitchute crowd is currently working up some assbackward conspiratorial defense here.
they’ll say that the deep state got to dearie or what trump is playing 3d chess.
K: play chess? IQ45 can’t even spell chess…
Kropotkin
dailykos.com/stories/2022/9 … classified
K: more about the village idiot… and it seems that the NY AG has
called for a “Major announcement” tomorrow morning…
wonder if it is the long overdue indictments?
Kropotkin
This is what Trump thinks is 3D Chess.
_
The real reason why Donald ran for Office…
Joe Rogan: “It was Obama talking shit about him 100%” 
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZwHxwqON80[/youtube]
K; shows us what a snowflake IQ45 is
Kropotkin
Once they had to face a special master’s review - AG Garland reduced his demand for ownership from 11,000 documents to merely 102. –
– tells you something.
Former AG Barr (a former mole in the Trump administration) encouraged AG Garland to appeal to their 3rd circuit - because Mr Barr knew who was on that panel. The appellate court chose to let Garland rifle through ALL documents regardless of their status until the special master decided which ones they had illegally seized.
Since the entire endeavor was to -
– they accomplished most of what they wanted (illegally - corruptly - criminally).
you saying that there was no crime?
There is very strong evidence that the US FBI and DOJ committed several federal crimes.
I haven’t heard any evidence that Mr Trump has committed any crime.
did you see his lawyer’s filings in the case about the documents? did you see him in that interview where he said he thinks he can declassify things just by thinking about it? like for real where are you getting your info from? i’m looking at legal filings handed into the courts by his attorneys, and at interviews where he himself is speaking.
Cite the statute stating exactly what a US President must do in order to declassify a document.
If there was such a statute - don’t you think that would have been the very first thing MSM and the DOJ would have mentioned? That one document would have put all of this hate mongering to rest in a single day - and proven that the DOJ was honest.
But - did they - or anyone ever mention the restraining statute? – There isn’t one = no restraint = “When I leave the White House with any document - it is thereby declassified” - because no restraint has ever been established.
If you are thinking those documents marked “Classified” and “Top Secret” are relevant - realize that they rarely remove any prior classification markings and apparently many such documents were never officially classified anyway - merely marked so as to keep them from the press and opposing party.
No statutory restraint on the President’s right to declassify documents means - yes - even him thinking they be declassified would at least be legal. But he had already stated to witnesses at the time that him leaving with any document immediately meant that he was declassifying it.
As President - when it comes to declassifying - He makes the rules (because no one else did).
the UR case for IQ45 falls apart for various reasons, mainly
in court filings…Now we know that UR is not an American and
thus is ignorant of American law but here in America a lawyer
has to tell the truth in court or risk serious charges…
when ask by the “Special Master” a judge, for evidence that IQ45
declassified document, IQ45 lawyers had no evidence, no documents
to show the judge, and by the fact that lying to a judge has implications
for the lawyers, they, wisely, choose not to lie…
the judge ask IQ45 lawyers to provide facts that the
FBI ‘‘planted’’ documents, and once again, IQ45 lawyers,
wisely, refused to answer…
so when given a chance, his lawyers made no claims of
declassifying documents or planting evidence…
Now IQ45 can claim the moon is made of green cheese,
and idiots like yourself will believe him, but in a court
of law, one must have evidence, or they will get
disbarred… Now in your country it may work differently,
but here you have to have facts, evidence in a court of law…
and IQ45 lawyers have yet to provide evidence, of declassification or
of planting of evidence… so, once again provide us with facts,
evidence that either IQ45 declassified documents
or that the FBI planted evidence… of course, if you do,
that will come as a surprise to IQ45 lawyers, because
they have not provided any such evidence where it really
matters, in a court of law, in front of a Judge who was requested
by IQ45… let me repeat that, Dearie, the judge in question
was requested by IQ45…
Kropotkin
Everything else you say is merely you deceptively promoting your fantasies (related to Adam Shiff? 
).
K: so, you have no idea about the process of declassifying top secret
material… it helps to be honest about your ignorance about
American law…
Kropotkin
Obviously it is You who have no idea of the law.
You are making the accusation - where is the law?
And while you are contemplating that - you might want to ask why Mr Obama just recently paid $3.3 million to NARA to go retrieve classified documents from an old furniture warehouse he has been storing them in. 
Doesn’t the DOJ need to have the FBI send a battalion of armed SWAT agents to go raid Mr Obama’s home for OTHER CLASSIFIED presidential documents threatening national security? 
apnews.com/article/fact-check-o … 9954890662
K: and where is you evidence that Obama paid NARA?
Kropotkin
[quote=“Peter Kropotkin”]
the UR case for IQ45 falls apart for various reasons, mainly
in court filings…Now we know that UR is not an American and
thus is ignorant of American law but here in America a lawyer
has to tell the truth in court or risk serious charges…
when ask by the “Special Master” a judge, for evidence that IQ45
declassified document, IQ45 lawyers had no evidence, no documents
to show the judge, and by the fact that lying to a judge has implications
for the lawyers, they, wisely, choose not to lie…
the judge ask IQ45 lawyers to provide facts that the
FBI ‘‘planted’’ documents, and once again, IQ45 lawyers,
wisely, refused to answer…
so when given a chance, his lawyers made no claims of
declassifying documents or planting evidence…
Now IQ45 can claim the moon is made of green cheese,
and idiots like yourself will believe him, but in a court
of law, one must have evidence, or they will get
disbarred… Now in your country it may work differently,
but here you have to have facts, evidence in a court of law…
and IQ45 lawyers have yet to provide evidence, of declassification or
of planting of evidence… so, once again provide us with facts,
evidence that either IQ45 declassified documents
or that the FBI planted evidence… of course, if you do,
that will come as a surprise to IQ45 lawyers, because
they have not provided any such evidence where it really
matters, in a court of law, in front of a Judge who was requested
by IQ45… let me repeat that, Dearie, the judge in question
was requested by IQ45…
K: any response? NO, I thought so…
Kropotkin
But then you don’t live in Washington DC - so you don’t really know anything about their laws - that is what you said - right? Isn’t that what you said?