Atoms are made of spaceships in which trillions of super-intelligent micro-beings live and in the far future we shall built also the whole universe into a spacecraftculture too.
Like it is in the microcosm it will be in the macrocosm too.
Atoms are made of spaceships in which trillions of super-intelligent micropeople live and in those micropeople are little atoms too of course which are also even smaller spaceships of an even higher spacecraftculture, and so on as an infinite progression.
In fact: the whole universe is not a dead mechanism what science wants us to believe, but it is built of living beings, micro-beings in the microcosm.
All those microbeings as one unity, as one being is GOD himself.
Read the new bible about Gods Kingdom in the microcosm:
home.wanadoo.nl/r.f.dezwart/Frame-engels.html
LOL
Thanks… i needed a good laugh!
Microcosms and Macrocosms are wonderful, but its the mesocosm in which we operate that is the real Bitch.
It’s a theory that doesn’t really work. Physics require an exact density of materials to work properly. Like, we need to push through the air to move, we cannot cope with too much resistance in the air. This infinate regression idea creates a huge mass of objects occupying small areas of minute spaces. This would create a thick soup for us to move through, and would create masses of energy, and hotspots. It would be extremely damaging to the aliens that live at a lower level to our world. Photons, and atoms wizzing around them, that are large enough to blow them to pieces.
There should be a minimum magnification just beyond what we already know. The smallest object should be a perpetual motion that creates a wave effect. The wave effect creates all of the other objects in the universe.
If you have no brains at all you might laugh
Are you a philosopher or a grocer ?
There is no real reason why the particals of the microcosm could not be spaceships and is a unity of density and emptyness, just like our world.
And because large and small are relative, there is also no real reason why there could not be an infinite progression(not regression) in the microcosm.
Science always thought that she had found the most smallest particle, but showed not to be true, that means that there must be an infinite progression.
And WE don’t have to move through, and the micropeople have to move through either, but live there in their spaceships, that we know as the particles of the atom.
Not waves are the basic material of the universe but living people.
Not abstract things, but concrete living beings.
Not the lower things are the basic, but a higher spirit.
The spirit of the all mighty GOD himself in the microcosm as a micro-being.
So how do you explain quantum?
I think I thought of this theory back in grade 7…
Leibniz had this idea about three hundred years ago, except he called them “monads” instead of spaceships.
You gotta admit it sounds less silly when you use Leibniz’s terminology.
The quantumtheory proves that the microcosm is a higher world according to my atomic theory, but you cannot explain with quantum physics how the universe has become out of nothing(that is an illusion), because our universe is eternal and stems from an infinite progression of higher and higher spacecraftcultures in the microcosm.
A bit of column A, a bit of column B…
Are you a philosopher or a soft science-fiction writer? Creating somewhat interesting fantaties that have the superficial marking of science, but lack the rigor and mind-boggling pendatry that modern scientific investigations require. Plus this is ultimately just another mask on a monthesitc fantasy of grand cosmic unity.
This monad philosophy was really primitive.
They had no contact with each other, but my spaceships do have contact and are the real unity of the cosmos.
And my idea is not so silly as it looks like if you really tried to understand it.
It is the greatest idea of all times.
The riddle of the cosmos has been solved.
It is no fantasy at all and no science fiction, but logical philosophy.
And my purple trousers are actually made of lumps of Saturn…
If you don’t understand anything at all, you could always make silly remarks.
I am used to it.
In that case consider me a predictable bystander
I am used to it.
Yeah, I bet. So why spaceships? Why not just little creatures?

Are you a philosopher or a soft science-fiction writer? Creating somewhat interesting fantaties that have the superficial marking of science, but lack the rigor and mind-boggling pendatry that modern scientific investigations require. Plus this is ultimately just another mask on a monthesitc fantasy of grand cosmic unity.

It is no fantasy at all and no science fiction, but logical philosophy.
If you are taking these ideas completely literally then you are being silly.
Damn, Harrie, you here too?
If you are taking these ideas completely literally then you are being silly.
Trust me, he takes this shit seriously. He even thinks he is the new Jesus Christ. He’s from the Netherlands, like I am. Here, he even appeared on national television.
I’ve been running into him in like… Every Dutch science/philosophy forum I know of.
And no, you can’t change his mind. Best to quickly lock this thread, ban the guy, and go on with your everyday business.
atoms are stable and not alive, just like rocks are.
once we get the techonolgy to do so,
we will see what they are made of.
i suspect spherical energy structures.