You’re joking right? Anarchy is about the most self-defeating political or philosophical position that’s even possible to take.
1 Like
Or all defeating.. 
2 Likes
Prom can’t decide if he is a socialist or an anarchist.
The problem with anarchy is that nobody is incharge. So if a leftist antifa wants to punch someone its all a matter of opinion. If a leftist punches another leftist, because he “looks like a white ICE person”, then “its all good bro”.
If you mention scientific racial differences between races, and a leftist says “that’s racist” then who is to say if its racist or not racist, leftist emotions and group-think dictate everything.
If leftists loot stores, burn down buildings and businesses, its “all good bro” because it is anti-capitalism, therefore it is good. Even though Soviet commie societies still had infrastructure in order to function, and businesses to buy goods at.
Worse than that is how anarchists handle crime, that is if they even handle crime at all. Guilt and innocence is determined by social status and hearsay. Next thing its giant family feuds everywhere or gang violence. Everyone with a different story and no judge and jury.
2 Likes
Anarchy as l understand it, is about localised authorities independent of each other. To me, it seems like a warzone system or a post-war system that everybody in an actual warzone passes through. I think it’s wrong for people to want Anarchy upfront, now. It should be a stepping stone as stated.
To want anarchy now, without there being a warzone or post-war societal collapse, is to wish for destruction. Maybe in order to get away with doing some very dark things.
1 Like
“Anarchy is about the most self-defeating political or philosophical position that’s even possible to take.”
To be sure, one doesn’t choose to be an anarchist like one chooses to be a christian or a utilitarian or a logical positivist. ‘Choosing’ is what philosophical tourists do. A genuine anarchist is such because he has to be… because he is in mortal danger if he is not.
My anarchy comes also after having reached the conclusion that marxism will never exist on this erf. Now, there are only two essential political theses, each one on the end of a philosophical spectrum of insubordinate ideas (philosophical ideas that must approach one end or the other and are meaningless without doing so). That’s the philosophies or Marx and Stirner. To make a very long lesson in ethics short, one is either a Marxist or a Stirnerite and nothing in between (unless confusion is counted as a philosophical position).
That being said, a world that is not or can not approach a marxist state is forlorn garbage not to be taken seriously and to be used however an anarchist sees fit.
We are the shadows that will eclipse any kind of society under your sun.
2 Likes
Man, l had to take you off iggy and reply to lol at you for that.
Diagnosis: Methamphetamine.
1 Like
Don’t i wish! I’ve always wanted to try meth (crystal) but have never even seen the shit before except on TV. Adderall and MDMA are the only amphetamines I’ve ever done. In fact, one of my fondest memories is when i went on a three day adderall binge crime spree when i was on the run from charges/crimes i didn’t commit. Back around 2016ish… right after i got out of prison from the first round of crimes that i didn’t commit.
2 Likes
“l had to take you off iggy”
You have me on ignore? Smart man!
1 Like
the world is forlorn garbage currently.
However in the future there will be trans-humanoids which slowly phase out the old humanity and become the new dominant species. Then the Socialist utopia will begin.
1 Like
This is carrot on the stick. To get you to do what they want. Even if God, in fact exists, I assure you there is no heaven. If there was a heaven and you were there eternally, you would be the last soul on Earth, last soul in the universe, in fact. There wouldn’t be other souls.
There can’t be simultaneous people living out their existence when you already have the totality of existence.
Jesus said this directly, when he said you donate to the poor you do it to Me. That was the whole thesis, magnum opus of Jesus. Communist socialism. Not capitalist solipsism. We are all one shared existence. Are you saying Jesus was a moron, an idiot, a simpleton?
1 Like
“trans-humanoids which slowly phase out the old humanity and become the new dominant species. Then the Socialist utopia will begin”
Hardly. In this future, there will be an even bigger difference in social strata. There will be fluid working class average citizens and then private militarized corporations that run the government. Think Elysium with your boy Damon. The wealthy will populate cordoned areas on erf and the moon while the working class citizens will work incessantly and live extremely regimented lives on erf… lives that will make the typical north korean citizen today look like an american on vacation in the Bahamas.
Yeah, so no. There will be no anime futurani pajama parties. If anything, it’ll be like Starwars.
2 Likes
See, that’s how I know you’re wrong.
Wasn’t sure at first, but when you said “wealthy people will live on the moon” that’s when I knew. No wealthy people will want to live on the moon, except the insane ones.
Yeah, so no. There will be no anime futurani pajama parties. If anything, it’ll be like Starwars.
They aren’t going to turn the moon into a death star laser.
Yeah, so no. There will be no anime futurani pajama parties. If anything, it’ll be like Starwars.
I said trans-humanoids. Futarani aren’t transwomen. And by trans-humanoids I meant all forms of humanoid synthetics, including cis looking synthetics.
The humanoids are modeled after an anime called No Idenshi. Yes I know the anime is too conservative. When I mentioned “no idenshi”, I meant the actual technology of the society, not their social conservatism. Although their conservative society is still superior to cyperpunk trash.
1 Like
@promethean75 I was wrong about Soros, so I edited my post. Did some research turns out he is probably one of the based billionaires. Gets a lot of criticism for no reason imo
1 Like
Cool take about Marx and Stirner there. I’ll have to think more about that. I also like your explanation of anarchy as specifically why a person might become an anarchist. Makes sense to me.
1 Like
Uhhhhm, George Soros teaming up with the Obama Administration to start Eastern European, Soviet-breaking Color Revolutions, in the United States, is a pretty damn good reason…
Anybody who cares about America, lives in America, doesn’t want society to collapse, ought to stand against Civil Unrest, Poverty, and Civil War. George Soros is responsible for altering the course of the “Occupy Wallstreet” protests, turning the American Left away from class war, into race war and tribal politics.
2 Likes
Soros isn’t a Zionist so I thought he was good.
You will have to elab on the other things and provide more evidence.
1 Like
@MagsJ Sounds like Soros is Giga Based.
2 Likes
.
You think so?
.
It’s always the old f*cks behind these funding networks, namely:- domestic terrorist organisations/ANTIFA; Open Society Foundations, the Tides Foundation, and foreign donors; the “Riot Inc.” network, which is alleged was coordinating and fuelling protests in Democrat-controlled cities.
.
1 Like
It’s in their interest to keep the public at each other’s throats. Soros is a ghoul, and like all the other ghouls, he only actually has allegiance to ghoul-kind.
I personally believe that it’s his function as one of the Globalists to sow and stoke division, he is after all, very good at it.
Who is leading organisations like ANTIFA? I mean they need organised after all.. Who are the front-men? The bean-counters? The promoters? That’s what I want to know..
But I don’t have time to read about it..
¯_(ツ)_/¯
2 Likes