The accumulation of the frustrating effects of capitalism’s real economic circumstances, not the effects of its peripheral ideological subculture wars, is what causes authentic marxist revolutionary activity, sirs. Arguing over transexuals’ rights to have abortions if the father is an illegal cuban zionist who believes in vaccines is not an authentic revolutionary activity. It’s more like a capitalism/consumerism sideshow.
If and when the real circumstances become dire, strikes, marches, and protests of the sort break out. These things express tangible frustrations with capitalism directly… not indirectly by being gay because Maroon 5 was always on the radio when you going through puberty as a lower-middle class kid in a hypergamous upper-class school and neighborhood. These things happen regardless of any Soroses being around or leftist professors holding the chairs in the universities.
The top-down political meddling of democrats is not what structures revolution. This is just more theater. N*ggas gotta rise up in the streets en masse, my dude.
Yeah so no marxism is not identity politics, bruh. And it doesn’t profess the wanton anarchy of smashing store windows or shooting health insurance company executives. OG Marxist were organized thinkers who wrote for society and social action/reform at national and international levels. Karl, Big Len, and Trotsky care fuckall about pregnant lesbian feminists attacking the capitol because another black person was shot by a POleece officer who wasn’t vaccinated for covid and drove a gasoline powered car.
Anyway, you are indeed still as cooked as you were a decade ago and continue to occupy a kind of pseudophilosophical Hollywood in your own head where nobody else has ever been… certainly no Marxists, for even as a post-marxist anarchist, i have no idea where you get this stuff.
I work a job that actively drug tests because I drive industrial equipment, so I have to wait for my yearly three week vacation to get stoned unfortunately. Otherwise I would be stoned everyday.
I feel like a cold ASI and don’t feel motivated to do drugs. I sit at home everyday on a retarded internet and retarded world. Even when I go outside and “exercise” most of the city looks boring and ugly.
1 Like
LampAndNightingale
(6 Points>6 Lines>6 Triangles, Between Nile & Euphrates)
73
The Globalist Agenda is utter BS in the way it is presented. The fact is, the secular world is globalist. The religious world is globalist. You are globalist. Each in their own ways.
The “Globalist Agenda” theories online are anti-EU and pro-Putin. It is 100% Putnism and a way of dismantling our interconnectedness in West Europe ahead of God-knows-what.
I would therefore consider “Anti-Globalism” to be treason, i.e. pro-Putinism.
LampAndNightingale
(6 Points>6 Lines>6 Triangles, Between Nile & Euphrates)
74
Yes God wants me to go to heaven and offers me rewards, including virgins, fruit, gold. I will take those if you don’t mind. You may sit on a spike for eternity, glib in your puritanism. You will never be more devout than Satan originally was - that didn’t end well did it.
If God offers me one thing and then asks me to sacrifice a bit more in time, energy, suffering, to have a few more rewards added on top, e.g. a cup of gold, some new tier of beverage, then l will do what l can to get more. If God tells me l will burn alive forever if l do another thing, then l will be disinclined to do that. And this is crucial because the flipside of your puritanism is that you don’t see hell as a disincentive for anything.
You don’t half come out with non-sequiturs, e.g.
“I assure you there is no heaven” OKEY DOKE! Heaven cancelled.
“If there was a heaven and you were there eternally, you would be the last soul on Earth, last soul in the universe, in fact. There wouldn’t be other souls.” <—???
“There can’t be simultaneous people living out their existence when you already have the totality of existence.” <---- ??? Yes there can. A box 1cm x 1cm x 1cm can exist forever if God wills it. Its existence will not kill God. Its existence will be contingent upon God. We all depend on him always and forever.
“There can’t be simultaneous people living out their existence when you already have the totality of existence. Jesus said this directly, when he said you donate to the poor you do it to Me.” So you mean, Jesus (peace be upon him) meant he was the only person that exists? So whom was he speaking to then? And who are the poor? And why should l accept your Bible? You are basing your philosophy on false premises, that there can only be one infinitely existent intelligence. We are all infinitely small segments of a circle, that circle being infinity. The partitioning of those segments is contingent on God’s will, in other words, our existence as separate entitites is contingent upon God’s will. When we give in charity, we help God (not Jesus), as the Qur’an states in multiple places e.g. Qur’an 2.245 “Who is it that will lend unto Allah a goodly loan, so that He may give it increase manifold ? Allah straiteneth and enlargeth. Unto Him ye will return.” This refers to charity and phrases it as a loan to Allah. It is to say, our sacrifice is to Allah because the situations he set up for charity are all imagined by him to test us. So we throw some money (charity) into the ring, to lay bets on him. We lend him a loan.
It’s quite a leap to say it means there’s no afterlife and the only intellect is God. Sure, nothing but God exists. That is from God’s POV but from our reality, we do exist and we can prove it, some of us curse God by our own free will and that can’t possibly be God doing it, thus our reality is fake, a simulation, but very real, it’s not like a silly computer game in the world of man. When God creates an illusion, it’s very real.
5. “Communist socialism. Not capitalist solipsism. We are all one shared existence. Are you saying Jesus was a moron, an idiot, a simpleton?” Or none of those. This is word spaghetti to me and has no bearing on the rest of your post that l can imagine.
