Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Morality and aesthetics.
Certainly what I believe to be beautiful in contrast to ugliness everyone outside of myself will not necessarily absolutely agree with me yet if that is so for aesthetical positions then is not morality in the eye of the beholder too?
What is individual morality but a aesthetical appreciation for certain specific narrow traits of an action?
What is collective morality but a agreement of what is aesthetically “correct” to the accepted understanding of what is considered to be order through aesthetics of a community?
Let it be know that morality is a aesthetical appeciation of certain narrow actions in what is considered beauty through order by a mass of selective people while amorality is individual disapproval of what is considered aesthetically beautiful by the community through idealization by preference of relative feelings.
If we cannot measure beauty or ugliness aesthetically by universal calculations or through a remote vision of absolutism what gives us the delusion that we can with morality in contrast to aesthetics? ( Silence dims the air.)
And what is morality the systemization beyond being an aesthetical painting of the world that is lifted up in the air as being a unassailible piece of art that surpasses all others in contrast to itself?
In aesthetics since beauty is in the eye of the beholder if I see a painting which envisions the entire earth should I choose to dislike it and reject it I simply can.
