So Judaism and Christianity teach that teaching against marriage and teaching sensualism are very serious sins.
So apparently, the highest state of being is getting hitched and feeling like shit forever!!
I actually think non marriage and balanced sensualism are the proper way.
I’m not going to argue all those cases here other than to say that treasures are devoid of ceremony or vows, they are organic and natural. So my philosophy is not of a religious ilk, but pure nature…
Some species of birds mate for life without a marriage contract 
Monogamy is not natural in the human species … therefore ceremonies and laws are required to perpetuate the unnatural.
Yet this simple fact does not render the Bible useless. The Bible helps to reveal that the prevalent dimensions of human life … to date … are mundane and profane.
Monogamy is natural in quite a few species other than just birds. Humans are both natural and not. The primary reason for marriage is for heirs not love.
Territory,assets require definite heirs. Love had zero to do with original oaths of monogamy. Today we have tests to prove actual heirs. If there is actual love paternity would not need to be proven. A female that lies about it is only a female not a lady.
Mating behavoirs are both learned and genetic. Sexual orientation is hormonal, but sexual aesthetics are genetic. Generally aesthetics can flux based on cultural paradigms, but have a basic core that stays the same. For instance, one day you might want pizza, and the next day, you might want broccoli, even if as a kid you didn’t like brocolli, the capacity to like brocolli was in your genetic coding.
Mating behavoirs are learned. For instance a cat cannot hunt without being taught how to do so by her mother. Likewise, a human will fail at human interpersonal relationships if it is not taught how to do so or it has a traumatic childhood. Therefore success at human relationships is more determined by social conditions than genetic superiority.
Never been around many cats have you or many animals? Animals have instincts that allow infants to feed without “teaching”. The young are not adept but, will progress with practice. Many , not all, orphans can and do survive thanks to survival instincts. A three week old kitten knows how to track and attack and eat. One to two week old do not really stand a chance though.
I get my data from science websites. Where do you get yours?
She may know how to hunt, but rarely catches a meal, kind of like how a black person knows how to date an asian woman, yet never gets any asian pussy.
Show me the website/s.
Mine comes from veterinary study, experience and veterinarians. Kittens will eat bugs and worms as easily as they will a rodent or bird. Kittens are far more independent then pups. Pups are not as independent but, mix breed pups or feral or undomesticated pups can be self sufficient at around. 6 weeks old.
Read it and weep, kitten.
Yea, I have read that. It is Popular Science. They are well known for crap reporting. They pick and choose what they think readers want. They are speaking of pedigree inbred felines, cats bought from breeders. Inbred felines are no different than any inbred animal. In that report they make passing comments about feral, but no indepth research. In a city, a community feral cat colonies are more often than not inbred. The hunting instinct will be warped as well. In a situation where no inbreeding or line breeding is done a feline will retain or have more survival instincts and abilities. Canines will also show more of these if bred as above.
But, keep your popular science belief, it is what you are expected to do.
Are you calling black people inbred because they can’t score with asians?
All humans are inbred to one degree or another as are all creatures. I do not know about the people where you live. Perhaps those blacks and those Asians have an issue. Down here there is no evidence of your claim whatsoever. I guess the folks here are more pleasant then where you are. I can only guess this because you are the only example.
The UK is a slave state, I don’t care for your people any more than I care for the people where i live. They are all garbage people.
For example, what I mean by a garbage person is a friend of yours that you warn her that the medication she is on has long term side effects and that it is dangerous for her, because of this she says you made her feel “unpleasant” and that you are “weird” and blocks you on facebook. That’s a garbage person, and the place where I live is filled with those kinds of people.
As for the blacks and asian thing, I think you are cissplaining and resorting to white privilege. You cannot empathise with the black male struggle of being unable to obtain sex with asians, because asians are racist, so you downplay their struggle by saying that where you live (UK, “pleasantville”) that it is pleasant and that blacks do not really struggle, and you downplay the inherent racism of asians towards blacks. This is why I don’t like humanists.
When did I move to the UK???
She should know of the side effects because they are printed on the medication itself and her doctor should have told her also
So either she forgot or she takes it in full knowledge of the facts but prefers not to think about it because of the consequences
And blocking you on facebook is not going to help her if the unpleasantness that she is suffering from is from these side effects
What she thinks of you is not really relevant but what is however is her own mental and physical health which is very important
Actually I gave her the inside scoop, cutting edge research before they were even listed on the paper in the bottle. She is not even using the medications for their original use she is retrofitting them for her own ends, as such the meds she is on were not even created for her biology or particular set of problems she is using them for, so there is a host of additional side effects not listed on the bottle since the meds were not designed to be compatible with her biology or what she is using them for. She is an ignorant fool, and a garbage person filler for the void.