.
Don’t worry about it.
The inner-workings of the mind of FJ.. ![]()
As far as that ( it) goes I feel an urge to say something in regards? To what? I can only remember vague things now, ‘The System’ will not allow, certain details, but general observations, under the watchful eyes of….Big Brother? ( take 6th here as well . Nevertheless the greater good, the Greater necessity, which games offer respite for, compels an advance, not a retrenching, an addictive move, and here capital through already a monopoly rules, irrespective of who the players are, be it Groucho, Harpo, or the one trying to play fair.
The Capital game in town , is the one where proof can only be had by a cross dresser, otherwise? What happens to an overbloated fat lady tried to recover her composure, whereas the automatrix has punishment in mind?
Difficult to recover when the spider lady is also presently unaccounted for. No no.
Go back to that asexual temptress whom no hiding in hamlets afar could rescue, not here in this life.
But here, saving grace, hark, transvalustion reversely is still not no no’ an anachronistic tediosity, where communes were relegated to mid 20th century new liberalism, and no rook could construe the idylls that appeared other wise, but then as the clock ticks and ticks, even exiled into the new perfect future, ( remembrances: of the past) etc. etc.
From where no possible exit became readable, no again until feelings were discovered of and by the clergy into a befrocked compensate of the rook above mentioned.
So drinks all around, old grandad any the wayside, the old rememberer transvalued finally, bringing back compensatory testaments. To make it simply ironic wish to quote that futurist terrific Italian ironist, whom after hanging off the cradle of civilizational unrest; and perhaps not at perceived cost to life(s)
()
https://youtu.be/79EnDc-Ucv8?si=A6y-pX27XypSc7YS
))(())((
(Far—————?
Stretch!)
Philosophers’stone(rock)
Rook(y)
At what level of reality, truth or illusion can the game be played? Seen or unseen? Or does it really matter at this point?
A long time ago I asked Colin Wilson this question, or was it that then infamous psychiatrist, the author of ‘Knots’ yes it was him at a lecture at USC in the Bogarde auditorium.. yes, and he just stared at me, and replied that I should see my psychiatrist, the now deceased woman from Belgrade, who met the Dalai Lama, and probably would dislike her name being printed out, and Mike telling me in the Haight Ashberry days, there is no ‘reason’ for it, as everything but most dear is reduced absurdly but not to absurdity yet, the castle of roaches is protracted by rooks, and is not yet convertible or negotiable as of this instant, according to Kurtzwell, maybe inn5 years predicts him, concurring a lot of others wanting to know.
)(
So really does pre tense or pretense gain points on the scorecard? Better then a redaction, plain and simple?!?
))()()((
Or? Is it mere virtuosity or fortiotous to be so designated (or instigated?)
Probable answer: most likely, again not to defer, or distinguish!!! That’s contrary to popular opinion/conviction, meaning counter productive, counter-revolutionary. Who wrote it,
- Lenin?
- Trotsky?
- Stalin?
- Marx?
- all of the above
- none of the above?
- none whatsoever?
Proof: why do former colonials(suppressed people, can not give up sleeping so much through the day? Yet the elite of those colonials after being granted ‘liberation ergo ‘freedom’ entity robbing their underlinks, ergo shopping in exclusive malls, even if it’s their whole paycheck?
& analogous to us, why do similar underlings have Cadillacs and in one very noticeable case Bentleys parked in the Friday of their derelict adobe?
Answer try.
Thanks for the game and couldn’t keep up with it, the traveling and watching the Alaskan affair.
Thanks Meno, well played. That was an interesting endgame, I had a material advantage but I felt like I was on the ropes because of your passed pawns and overall pawn structure. That kind of imbalance is rare for me, so much harder to read.
Game is here if anyone else is curious.
.
I guess crazy people say crazy things.. ![]()
.
..but back to the game.. I’m not giving up without a fight. ![]()
Cause I can remember vague things now, without and within contexts, things seem to make sense.
Since I wrote that I discovered More Jokai , a Hungarian writer of great tribute, . It fills in so many lapses of memory, literally a mind blower.
Just read a few things by him, and he was very prolific. Good thing I can read the language, with a very diminished ability to speak it.
Gives me hope to reignite the fire!
I wonder what’s there in translation, if any into English, it can be rewarding!
Eureka, found it in ‘Goodreads’ how silly of me to think that such famous regional author wouldn’t have gained wide recognition!
)(
.
Progress?
Free-flowing chains of thought, of when things just come to mind without any effort needing to be made.. you gotta love em..
.
A heartbreaking storyline, but hopefully not ending.
It flows in and out, naturally like the heartbeat’s pumping blood and the lungs air. Continuance is not always a matter of choice, but when it is, it’s conditional to space, time and subject — matter.
It’s tied to all action and reaction, in all biological beings, who may exist for a season, or a hundred years, then it’s existence would be tied to eternal existence, why?
Because the why not is not a configured contraindication within it’s self, but one that is always reclaimed through a paradoxically reduced simple elements.
What I’m trying to say MagsJ, that it is mere chance, or what that kind of flow we call evident brings it about. Our will? Is 5 percent of the contended frame within it’s paradoxically found.
Like time found as a genie in a bottle out there in the other 95% .
Hope to read all, within maximum allowance of time in a quickly fading space, ironically the reverse appears, and illusion is another word for this inverted paradox.
He was very prolific!
Sour grapess, we can play that game as well, when you”re allowed to go back and correct your mistake, , but then that would be unusual , we can even play a suckers game, a losers game where when you win you loose,
Or start out with a material deficiency in one side or both side like starting without a piece or pieces.
How bout that?
.
Errrr.. like I’ve said before, each game is a learning curve but I’m not intuiting it/trusting my instincts, is all.
Your win was very well deserved.. ![]()
So then can a challenge be in the works based on the kind of
up above? (Black-white key(s)?
.
I thought I had.. my challenge requests don’t seem to be going through.
I’ll make another one.
Ok got it, let’s go!
.
I think I’ve stepped up my level of playability a notch or three, now.
.
Let’s get it! ![]()
RISK has always been one of my favorites, had a copy of it as a kid LOTR themed. Was amazing.
.
I spoke too soon.. ![]()
.
New challenge.. set.


