I am in love with this thing because I’ve intuively sensed that logic, geometry and philosophy are intimately connected.
In fact all statements are self-recursive rings
I’d like to post on the topic of “self recursion” but its a concept that I intuitively understand in ways I don’t fully understand myself just yet but I know it’s related to boolean logic / boolean algebra.
All philosophical arguments are in fact boolean statements.
They can be answered with a yes true or a yes that is false / incorrect, or an “undefined”, which basically means 'insufficient / no data".
I’m going to post a picture later of how I’ve started to build arguments, note that it is a time consuming process but it is well worth the effort You can map meanings and relationships in networks and see the recursion rings. I’ll post again once I got the picture uploaded
Here is the ONE I wanted you to see - Logic loop structure update (Fuck it appears photbucket nerfs the size of the image into uglyness and unreadableness, can I upload it to someone here and have it posted to the website?): i10.photobucket.com/albums/a134/ … s_1a_b.jpg
I dunno do you trust computers with highly complicated design of drugs, do you trust the robots that designed you car, phone, computer, fridge, stove, etc? Your comment is a stupid comment in the age of automation. Human beings are lower cognitives, we suck that’s why our world reflects the fact that we suck you are no bastion of light yourself, of that I am certain.
I’m just saying it HELPS map relationships, it will tighten your argument if you use it in combination with logic, if you don’t need it then why did you reply? I posted this for other people that might find it useful and helpful.
Seems a lot of people on this forum are negative out the ying yang.
