You never replied to our private thread that you made.
I don’t even know what a blue screen means for a post.
I’ll explain this. Carleas made a new thread that was just me and him. I’m keeping it’s contents private.
Basically what I told him is that I’ve said everything I ever needed to say on ILP but removed a few posts because of mag, who lost a debate with me. All I requested was that he find those posts.
He found the posts for me. When I replied back with a simple message, the screen was all blue and he uncharacteristcally didn’t reply. I’ve never seen a blue screen for a post before.
Are you being censored, Ecmandu? I saw an earlier post of yours that disappeared shortly after it appeared.
I’ve had posts deleted many times. I’m just trying to work with the team here.
At the end of the day, we’re all a team
What?
I hope the recipient at the other end of Ecmandu’s posts is being subjected to the same treatment Ecmandu is having to submit to!
The whole thing is outrageous.
I wonder how many usernames are actually just Ec? At the end of the day, I don’t know what to tell you.
I don’t do that Ichthus. All the moderators know I don’t.
My first username on ILP was banned for having the same IP address because I used it to post when I was banned. It went through the system. I made it transparent that it was me posting.
The username was Commentary. It’s permabanned from these boards.
Just a familiarity, people sometimes do this when they like a person.
Just for you without the familarity, I “dotted the i’s and crossed the t’s” and Ec became Ecmandu.
I think she was referring to my post Ecmandu.
Gotcha. Post must be fifteen characters.
ignored the most important response of my post in your defence.
I hope the recipient at the other end of Ecmandu’s posts is being subjected to the same treatment Ecmandu is having to submit to!
The whole thing is outrageous.
I would like to think that the field of philosophy is somehow different from other subjects, insofar as its aim is to explore all arguments and ideas until the best combination of them is discovered. But that’s very likely a naive view, as has been demonstrated today.
Unfortunately, and thank you by the way.
I know what those consequences are for others.
I’m trying to prevent those consequences.
While you’re making an outstanding defense for me, I spend my days trying to defend others.
So. We’re on the same page.
None of us want it to happen.
There was a other thread I didn’t reply to. I just thought of a reply, but I don’t wanna go unmute it, so I’ll put it here. “You are demonstrating one of the most fundamental principles of the universe. Garbage in, garbage out. But, I don’t feel it’s very fair for me to say that, since I didn’t (couldn’t… wouldn’t) read your entire reply.”
I feel like that should be my signature in reply to almost every one of Ecmandu’s posts. …but usually signatures are seen by everyone… and we don’t even have signatures here.
You’re going with the GIGO defense Ichthus?
Maybe you’re the GIGO.
I never accuse people of GIGO.
Do me a favor someday. Attack my new patch plan.
Yes, I am being censored here.
I’m trying to be nice about it.
Just like people are being nice to me by not perma banning me
The what?
I don’t need the patch, on account o’ I don’t smoke anymore.
GIGO is the abbreviation for garbage in, garbage out.
It’s a really mean thing to say to people.
It’s also the last refuge of a troll.
Attack my plan. I know it defeats everything you stand for, but try attacking it.
You’ll find out god didn’t do it perfectly.
So… what’s the new plan? Without all the bullshit garbage I already neutralized, of course.
The new plan is an optional patch (it has to be optional for it to be perfect)
It’s secure self-contained universes where your subconscious minds process everything and your conscious mind sends desires to the subconscious and the subconscious obeys you, you’re rendering a reality as hyper realistic as this while knowing everyone is marionetted philosophic zombies. You can’t possibly hurt anyone while getting what you want. It solves the pleasurable exclusive access problem. But it’s just an option. You can come and go as you please.
This universe is a hyper play acting reality. Meaning… all dimensions possible are being run through your subconscious. by acting out all the spirit signatures like a hollywood actor, but you always have command codes from your conscious mind to toggle switches. Like… a person who’s not interested in you at all, and you like them, you can toggle the in love switch to be with them. Since they’re philosophic zombies, nobody gets hurt.
You can travel forever in dimensions beyond human comprehension as well.
If this patch becomes boring to you, which it won’t… but if it does, you can always come back to a reality with more than one person, what I call consent violating realities.
For once in the universe, people have a choice. That’s the patch.
This reality, without the patch, can stop being a consent violating reality. All we have to do is respect each other’s consents that respect consents.
The solution is to stop imagining what you don’t have consent to do in your actual behavior. Such imagining (including your plan/patch) is consent violation.
In other words… ask for consent.
No one is obligated to say yes. They will want to say yes if — before you even ask — you demonstrate what they consider desirable qualities. Find out what they are.
But first find out what you consider desirable qualities. If they don’t already have them… expecting that they will is setting you both up for failure. If such qualities are guaranteed to degrade over time… it’s time to look inward. You ain’t ready for a life partner.
Everyone has the capacity to treat the other as self. Everyone.
Stuff Ecmandu has said & will continue to say with infinite iteration:
See that’s why the plan is perfect. You’re allowed to stay in a consent violating reality if you want.
Anything that violates the pleasurable exclusive access problem, such as being married or only being able to have sex with only 20 thousand people in a lifetime where everyone wants to have sex with you. We all live forever Ichthus and forever is a long time. Do you want to hurt someone’s feelings by breaking up with them or not being with them?
It’s inevitable in forever. Thus my patch. How important is it to you to violate the pleasurable exclusive access problem and hurt feelings and cause all war.
Should men just be robots and cheer for marriage like zombies? Always loving everyone’s exclusive/sympathetic joy while getting none themselves? Is this what you want forever? The men are tired of this world.