Self-significance delusions:
I debate old omniscient beings every day and night.
i also have dealt with power differentials that are extremely rare for a human to see.
I solved the Reinman hypothesis; I disproved both Cantor and Chaitin by listing all possible numbers. And I invented clean energy.
I solved existence for every possible being. Another gift I gave you.
You claim in your Riemann thread that you’ve “solved chess” and can “beat the most difficult chess machine on earth”, that’s an easily testable claim. You can play against a 2800 Elo bot on lichess.org, or a 3200 Elo bot on a chess.com free account (Carlsen and Nakamura are around 2800 on chess.com).
Have you tested it? If for some reason you aren’t permitted to play chess against computers, notice that you aren’t allowing yourself to test a claim.
(And I’d be up for a game too if you play, but only as a friendly game and not a test of metaphysical claims – I’m an all-too-human 1500.)
There are meaningful definitions of ‘green’ for a blind person, e.g. ‘reflecting light having wavelength of between 495 and 570 nanometers’.
More importantly, it’s possible to prove to a blind person that people can perceive green, just as we can prove that bumblebees perceive colors that we can’t see.