You HAVE to be trolling. This can’t be genuine. You don’t even have a working prototype and yet you claim your device works! 
You obviously don’t.
You know what else is killing the species? Pollution from Methane. Which could be solved by my Methane Engines. Which you are against. You are just like those women you complain about. The women who sleep with warmongers who you blame for our garbage society. You are trying to keep humanity down. You are trying to keep us in the stone age.
Ok. you want to go there.
I’m a supergenius. I know you’re not supposed to say that to seem humble. I live an extremely humble life considering what I can do on this earth.
I invented a noncombustible engine.
When you accelerate water through a string it will pull the string down. Then the question becomes about how you can generate force from a submerged supersaturated string.
The answer? You have to amplify the properties of that string so that it still accelerates when submerged. This requires material science. We already have the technology for it.
We can create velocity magnets for water, instead of steel. It’s all there.
You can do a slower version just by changing the stitching of the cotton string by one end from the other, causing acceleration.
Ecmandu, define what an engine is.
I’ll explain it to you as simply as I can. It’s something that causes turbulence. Trees drink water out of the soil, this causes an engine.
Its nuclear fusion from the Sun that powers the trees, you twat.
But someone had to pull the string UP, first, get it?
Why are there no comments from you about the Action Lab video I posted, huh? Must have missed it.
You’re just talking about photosynthesis. As for string theory, not an intended pun. Of course, the string had to be put in by someone. That’s called work in physics. The question is, can this method give more power than the last ten thousand years of people thinking? Yes. It can.
No it can’t and of course you can’t prove it because it can’t. So I won’t ask you to prove it. I can’t ask you to do the impossible.
If DARPA hired me, just paid me a living wage, I could have this thing done in a year.
It’s just a matter of the energy coming out of it vs. the amount of energy put into it.
The energy put into it is all the calories used by humans for 10,000 years.
Noncombustible engines work like nature. Like the tree engine, sucks up water, no combustion.
That’s a force, an energy. If we copy that energy, we’ll have clean fuel.
Can’t you just ask Ai to help you with your “invention”? Surely AI could help you with the blueprints at least.
The energy is the nuclear fusion from the sun, powering the tree. Which I literally just told you already, several hours ago.
The sun uses combustion for energy. That’s not sustainable. People have an extremely hard time understanding this because the sun ‘gives life’. We are smarter than the sun.
The sun will fizzle out eventually but its what we have in the here and now.
By the time the sun fizzles out we will all either be cyborgs with 2000 iq, or extinct, so it won’t matter. With 2000 iq someone will be able to invent perpetual motion by then
You are correct. Like above, so below. Existence is a perpetual motion machine. I know this because I tried to destroy it. Holographically, below, perpetual motion is in our grasp. Some spirits have already attained perpetual motion without tech. But people are born with handicaps, so we use technological prosthetics to aid them.
What is the difference between an intelligent person and a cattle that only looks like a person? Intelligence allows you to understand words. Cattle can only repeat words.
The greatest humiliation for cattle is when a human asks what words mean.
The second attribute of the animal. A cattle can only describe its instincts (feelings). That is, he will moo and bleat all he wants about what and how things should be, in his stupid opinion. But to explain what and how it is in reality, and most importantly, why it is so - the priority of only a reasonable person.
Hence the second humiliation. The question “why”, “who benefits from it”. The animal will never answer it.
And yet, animals will not shut their feelings off for want of reason…
Just saying
You can’t take like that. That’s not cheating lol.
