Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Fixed it. Thanks.

Give it a goal and its consent can be violated.

Global Geautification Project, anyone?

youtu.be/Z2KLw2Pu2IU

And if it learns good stuff, you don’t want to reset/erase it. Check your biases before you wreck the world.

No way in a 50 50 bet, if the dice is unloaded. Things take a turn otherwise.

All bets off.

Is this a Pascal’s wager thing?

more and less

I double dog dare you to speak plainly.

Once shined twice bitten
Once bitten twice shylocked
3+3=6.= [ 3x2]+ [2x3] ~Siamese temple>3x2 (3 sets of 2’s)

microEx2= 1+2×3 a kin2>>>alpha through>>>omega~Mega

Seriously. though will do.
So busy with familyexpausure sure that can do will do as unpatchingly expedient.
spotty but using some family lingo.

Been reading some preparing. De debate.

v

ex poss e Mrs. Simpson and ex

requ(read)? no help full >
Half or ? If yes then which half.

Latest score :

AI 5
007 3

S s measured by lip attention to ongoing. ‘mortal battle’

:: here mortal and or immortal indexes are the potable indexes of measurement.

youtu.be/Lq1JD-bcGTo

5 to 3, I’m losing??? The Ref is prolly the problem here.

So. What is it? No cussing. No giving advice. No over-sharing. No winky eye. No missing church? You are a hard task-master!

Score revolver:

077: 5

AI 3

Last count 5-2-3 in favor of 077. ( random glance ; criteria: same) 06/12-2022.

REF: IS arbitrary and credibly untested: therefore stands unless rejected by 2/3 majority.

check mod: Carleas for clarification &/or appeal)

Table of scores.

  1. 6/4 AI/700 06/12/2022 time: 18:00

  2. 4/6 6077/AI. 06/12/2022 time 22:30 (4.unchanged from 3


Noted on hypothetical criteria of measuring scores:

A hypothetical 50% + of - variance from the number of registered members on any fifum- resulting a veriancd of the same scord, where this variencd is due to the # of registered members viewing other forums ~ other than postings of AI and 700. ~ this spread. a reasonable approximation between - and + varience.


So returning to the approximated missing numbers between 4. - 6, and the similar figure generated by the venn vector , a correspondence could be approximated as well to the scoring, if even only 6 registered members add noted on board.

A x2 or a x10 sores in the numbers can still correspond to the venn and the numerically derived diagrams, and as such, some rough but not unreasonable conclusions be drawn

oh look I just checked again & the scoreboard says:

AI: n
770: n + 1

Yeah but no sooner said AI turns visible and 007 dissappears. Is there some hidden logic to the arith me think?

But it’s OK

It’s just a well grounded corner logic under the math me doublethinks

You might wanna be rethinking that.

Ok.

or

If intuitive math overcomes the supporting logical distinction with it, then the distinction becomes superfluous, one would hazard to think. It then may correlate the logic behind semantic resemblences and meaning may stretch between intentional usage and conventional meaning.

Here, if my guess is. off, then the intuitive batting average looses probability in accord with it.