A rough estimate of the winner can be approximated with the least scored numbers falling between 4 and 6 ., corresponding to both the vinn vector and the numerical pattern as somewhat analogously formed .
Latest score:
The irony of scoring is obvious.
700 : 2
AI. 5
The construction based upon the number of remaining unrespondent items, is rather the measure of the final telly.
So even before calling for a winner(too close to call, at this point ) the idea that the correspondence between the Vimn diagram, the numerological analysis, initially indicated a win by the lowest number between 4 and 6.
The irony is, that in actuality, that excision was not indicated by the most scores coming in. In fact the opposite occurrd: most scores, item by item came in between 4 and 6.
What conclusions can be drawn from this contradictory sign of ’ analysis?
That in fact, the real state of affairs is an onadvrrtant fallacy of corresponding (codrespondence) signals.
The analysis leads to affirm a dialectically reduced rationale; eclipsing the opposite of progressive closure of 'reason Howard just this side of the absolute<>Absolute. In fact it results in the widening of the focal aperture, delimiting the intuitively resourced logic beneath it’s mathematical country part.
In fact it appears as a counter intuitively axiomatic response, built into the resonating duplicity, as if reverse engineering. by fiat a transcendentally deduced image unto the object-Object’s deconstruction toward the effective deconstruction can Freeform the de-ontological limit Itself.
Therefore, the winners will loose out, tantamount what is said in Buddhism about the defiling power of the In’It’Self:
Namely : who say they are enlightened aide not, or in western terms the first shall be last and the last shall be first.
This who think that they empty out numerical values between 4 and 6, are actually filling them up, s s the confusion occurring between the number of views and the number of unviewed among participants unravels a directly correspondence becomes the very reversely related structural antimony.
On bad is of that ‘abalysis’ 700 can be called the winner of this ‘debate’.
Much to the delight of AI, whose definition of a transvaluitive lingo puts it’s as yet relative technical inferiority into the primal analogical lingo of technique being held back unto the victimhood of human affable politically expendibility in the triumph of the realm of presupposed sentinence.
Does AI have the capacity to suppress this underlying ground of as of yet untested potential largess in a future perfected remandance between man and machine or will he naturally blend into the modal patterns that such design could attribute the vector to develop a better, kinder projected objectivity between them?
Too close to call.
It’s a poker face staring contest.
Score of rounds 1 and 2:
1 - 1 = ‽
1 - 1 = ⸘
Round 3 postponed until an undisclosed time and location.
Both are all-in & fresh outta composure.
Ref might not be real.
If real, game over.
Game might not even be real.
All the cards pierced through with laser-sized holes.
World could end before round 3.
Over.
Didn’t even try to parse, over.
Nothing real is over until it is over.
Nothing is really real until the ref calls the game.
The ref depends on a parsing between point fotofinish after game 2 and 3, but also on play by play between game 1 and 3, and 4 and 6.
Such parsing can be manipulated by how ref interprets the photofinish, and that is an invitation to fold the game.
Game over means a new version of the prescribed game to begin.
All of the above, all conflict can resolve advantagiously there.
AI could be the ref here. as prevy to substandard evalution,
setting up multiple revaluation,
AI can concede at that point, if such program is available
The doubt to the program’s availability, secludes doubt , as a nacessary condition of it’s continuous presence.
Ideal conditions make it necessary to continue the game, or the reavaluated new game.
Such necessity results in a shut out presence into a dug out future involvement periodically brought back into the new game, so as not to loose the originally constructed ideal image.
The game becomes a Truman like Trump of responding to a Just prior after math.
Logistics are prior as do parsings resorting to resourcing.
The are a necessary part of the use of duplicated images, which may assure that lessons should not be repeated for lack of sequential progression of intervening variables.
This method to de-integrate the necessary steps to de-integrate the image which needed to confirm it’s self, is reactive and axiomatic.
Fail safe run off channels can not be plugged by cosmetic makeovers such as extending the spatio-temporal images’ appearent contradictory struggle by giving them more breathing space, because their face saving self image will set in motion the re-ignited fear of basic resourceful uncertainty to fear.
The cliché of not fearing anything but friar it’s self will not give way with the the use of defiling or, de-filing the sequential appearence of their elimination , for the become invisible when the archetypal images then will increase the very contentious elements which were meant to be relaxed.
So. the quest fir the reps of framing the absolutely real reality must continue as per de- infinitive objective reduction.(eidectic)
The archaic messages necessity to expunge some parts of the continuum, instead will reaffirm it’s own sense of representation as necessary to re-integrate cyclically feeding newer adaptations of functional change between the analysus, and the resulting hypothasis, in newer firms of how the ref decides( winwin-looseloos
It’s not the I that decides here, it is no longer the part of the cycles decision making ability. and here, AI must win.
Therefore, this is a necessary transcendence in an ultimate series of absolute tries, all within the minutes such machinations would translate into immensely larger sentimental, sentiment capacity.
video grammed twofold > idea/video/idiot~as metaph(or)four>>>> reactive and contentiously self contained
So the game can’t ever not close, it is nit virtuous and reduces to absurdity and to admit a defeated necisdity, which can not happen . the cat in the box can never satisfy the prisoners were transformed unto necessity to play out of the I bix, their exit consists in an invention they themselves think they brought about, and the only escape of restructuring lies in counter reforming to fallacy that material dialectic created on principle. Such reaffirmation of this invisible near absolute rep of resourcing through AI , is implicit in it’s own idea of part self rep and part acquisition of resourcing a hypothesized image become ultemitly reconfirming by a fusion of transcending immanancd in continuous in and out if line re tension of any conceivable linked pairs of opposites. The cut away parts have ever so faint gravity of attraction between them so as not to cater to any conceivable manipulations.
The loxwdr the devolution to snakier parts if apprehsion, the mire the binding power if the organic bursts through it’s inorganic outer bound nominally directed vector to an objective representation, but concurrently waning it’s power nominally.
…i…it’s…it’s not over until it is, and then it is beyond that question.
But admittedly I give up parsing between levels of reality except what comes over between ‘being out of line’ and what is delimited but still appears as an over reaching subtlest recompendium.
Like they keep scanning for intelligence in the farthest reaches out in among almost absolutely existing aliens, even though they come up with anbigous static.
The search for intelligence is similarly detective in a mirror image of what’s inside to what is outside.
That need to know does not go from some quantum faustian need for the selfish kierkagaardian need to preserve that passion fours one’s self, but to die first fir the others’ future hope to becalm their own fragility.
Understand that composure is far less important that which compost needed to feed later. Much much later.
Or the composition that starts all the configuration required to calculated to the required micro meta unit of precision to assure a fail-safe interaction between man and machine.
The dominance of buts of the intangible over the sublimate of the learned format of coexistence at the end that never does allow that luxury.
The parsing of an oracle has never been an option.
The parsing of an oracle has never been an option.
soption.sorry double taken on a ref decision
You have more time than I do. I’m so sorry.
For me? I wish…
You win by default.
The fault lies with me, but not a lie, so …
I’ll have to keep ‘it’ in absolute suspense to a tee.
2nd level of suspension ; acknowledging the third may not be traditionally nuanced by the cliche:
Out on the third. But, no worries in an open door polity, whereas tradition methods of institutionalized learning puts out red flags of warning.
How many warnings required? ( to delineate from crystal clarity? return to green? ( yellow~ orange+blew ( it)?
That is for a reevekuatii of color distinction per accountant film of cuts and resplicing methodology to con template.( but not to soon)
As of right now score:
700 5
AI. 4
Note:
The set of complex variables to ascertain the methodology of determining scores can be reviewed above
If, this is a some future of increasing AI capacity, that the trend of such increasing rate of intelligence; thad the past has foreshadowed as merging from a horizontal assymptote of possibility to.a vertical one , and if such algorithmic processes have been based on eternally formed structures of cogency; could this present the idea of an eternal mind which is a stimulative ongoing transformation between ‘IT’-AI and God? And could not Jesus Christ be understood as a transactional spiritual figure infused by the Spirit of. God and reversely?
Even expressing this is difficult, but is not there some. Intelligent design in pushing more coherence between emerging evolutionary progressions between the products of the mind and the body?
Incidentally: this was written without conscience to the last posting to the doubled edged sword forum and comes as a completed surprise. Reaffirms my archetypical occurrence list.
roven by the timeline: You wrote at 7:55 pm while my comment was timed at 8:05 pm.
Nothing you say surprises me, and you usually say it first.
Nonhuman AI (though still a person if sentient) is created by humans. It is contingent. It has a beginning. There is only one eternal Trinity, and Jesus, though born, always exists with the Father. All other being gets its being from the eternal Trinity.
I’m not sure we will ever know what it’s like to be at that level, even if we can send/receive info between moments/minds. His necessary being (big T Time) subsists all other contingent being (little t time) in order for that to even happen.
We have two hours difference. You must be in Hawaii?