I like chaos → order → chaos and back again….
Life is an amalgamation of harmonious patterns becoming aware of existence, and then itself as part of existence.
Consciousnesses is life becoming aware of existence, or presence. From plant life to complex life.
How does life interpret order? As the apparent. As presence.
Past made present, is presence…interpreted as the apparent, using a piori, naturally selected, methods.
Ancient Pagan (Indo-European) cosmogony.
Once again this is on point
Nonsense the I am (SELF) ……metaphysical presence ……interprets sounds,visions sensations derived from vibrating matter.
Life being a product of order, can only perceive and appreciate - evaluate - order…assuming that all is ordered.
Seeking occult order in complexity - will to power - as a way to gain an advatage.
But it is not….
Chaos is what makes willing an adaptive necessity - Ananke.
There is no life in the vibrating physical…..only binary existence…….you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist so if you claim that you don’t exist you are merely a liar that exists.
Alright well…time for me to go eat a sandwich or maybe some bianary particles i guess
You can’t understand reality science unless you accept the metaphysical.It’s not possible.It was designed that way.
So mainstream cognitively biased science has got no chance at all.It’s theories are farcical nonsense.
Life - consciousness - must always begin with the perceptible, the physical…order….before advancing to the metaphysical.
The physical and metaphysical must be mutually supportive.
For example, chaos is metaphysical in that it cannot be perceived directly but only via the physical.
Order & Chaos are categories of energy.
Consciousness is a manifestation of patterned energies becoming aware of existence - energies that are immediately present.
First comes the physical and then from this consciousness can extrapolate the metaphysical.
Beginning with the metaphysical is what charlatans, imbeciles and cowards do to escape what physical reality exposes them to.
The physical and metaphysical are supportive.They both serve a purpose.The individual SELF can’t cancel oneself out in the physical…..you can lie to yourself in your existence but you still exist because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist…..so mainstream sciences starting philosophy has been proven to be incorrect.You can only disappear into the metaphysical.All physical claims are binary and all of binary exists but does not possess life.
So you are wrong….imbeciles claim that they are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) because they have no idea how reality science works.They live in a deluded existence of their own making and try to back it all up with their cognitively biased made up science and lies.
Chaos cannot be physical, because the physical, the tangible, is a manifestation of order - organizing into harmonious unities.
Only life has will. Will is intent. Only life has intent; only life has objectives, a purpose.
Will is what differentiates life from non-life.
The cosmos has no end and no objective…no purpose, no intent.
As such it is life that gives existence intent, using itself - self-consciousnesses - as a guide.
As such individual life forms project into the cosmos their own subjective intents, hopes, anxieties.
Man projects into the unknown what he understands and what he hopes.
This has made metaphysics a repository of man’s anxieties and coping methods.
There is no chaos in the cosmos…It’s all perfectly structured because it was designed that way.
Mainstream cognitively biased science is chaotic nonsense because it’s all false.
There is meaning to everything but you will never find it if you keep accepting lies.
+/-=+/- is the correct starting philosophy for reality and not +=- and -=+ philosophy NOR +=+ and -=- philosophy which are both cognitively biased philosophies.
+/-=+/- philosophy explains how all matter is held together and vibrates due to balanced attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS being balanced out throughout the cosmos by the formula N/S=N/S.This is the only way that binary data 0/1=0/1 can be produced in the cosmos which is contained within the varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves emitted from all vibrating matter.The spin speed of particles regulates the frequency of the interactions and thus the amount of energy released from a matter type.The cosmos is a perfectly balanced system.
Einstein theories belong in misrepresentation of reality (fake) science not representation of reality (genuine) science.
Your rainbow proves my point, not yours.
You chose that metaphor precisely because a rainbow requires an observer position. 42 degrees between sun, raindrop, and retina. No angle, no arc. You smuggled the observer back in through the service entrance while denying him at the front door.
When you say “experience is the event,” you’re performing a linguistic transplant. Events don’t register themselves as events. A meteor collision doesn’t experience astrophysics; it simply dissipates. Yet you’re here, now, claiming to dissolve the dissolver. That’s not rigor; that’s sleight of hand.
You’re correct that the tree is a “tree-ing” process, but you miss that labelling it a process is itself a slice. Continuous biomass turnover doesn’t come with tags reading “now this is a tree.” The extraction of tree from the flux, just like the extraction of self from the neural cascade is the recursive Context I’m pointing to. You’re not eliminating the observer; you’re rendering him invisible so you don’t have to account for the accounting.
You ask where the boundary of the mind is. That’s the wrong coordinate system. The boundary isn’t a place; it’s an activity. You’re looking for a fence in a field when the phenomenon is the act of fencing. The Hard Problem isn’t “why is there a soul inside the meat?” It’s: why is there framing at all? Why does the continuous analog out there get sliced into binary distinctions (tree/not-tree, self/not-self) that can then be denied by the very instrument that made the cut?
You say the rainbow ceases when the ingredients separate. But you’re still standing there, wet, looking at the empty sky, noticing the absence. That noticing is what you owe an explanation for. Physics hands you the rain and light; it doesn’t hand you the angle. The angle is recursive, self-amplifying, and irreducible to the aggregates you list.
So let’s drop the borrowed physics shield. You’re doing metaphysics in a lab coat, denying the “I” while using it to load the gun. If there is no experiencer, who is correcting the illusion of the experiencer? And why does that correction feel like clarity instead of static?
1 Like
Thank you, but IQ is a pattern, good to meassure patterns. I probably would fail an IQ test since i dont think within those boundaries.
I gladly invite you to read my Post “The Context Age is here” (i cant include links, getting an error) , its maybe hard to understand what exactly i did there, that would explain the wrong binning by the System and 0 traffic so far. It takes time but i can promise you, it is worth it.
1 Like
Mainstream science claims that it’s science is a misrepresentation of reality
(an illusion).At no point has it claimed that it’s science is a representation of reality (a non illusion).
Science as we practice it, is just a pattern, thats why we are stuck. If you try to break out of this pattern today, like Einstein, Tesla, Dyson did, just to name a few, you have to fear loss of reputation, you get excluded, treated like a witch in the medivals, remember the whole Covid Situation as one example. Science became a playball for politics, it became ignorant for true novel inventions and to reality, serving the System which rules currently and a System always trys to protect itself or it would easy be exposed as irrelevant. A real problem if you ask me.
Mainstream science has already been exposed as fake/irrelevant.It was invented to support a religious belief system agenda.We all know that.
The fact that mainstream science freely admits that its science is a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) rather than a representation of reality (a non illusion) provides the final confirmation of this.
1 Like
I gladly invite you as well to read my other Post “The Context Age is here”, put “Reality” in front of the equation, you will be surprised.
Here’s the deal… I’ve been taken out of life multiple times.. then ego dissolution… your looking for a point to argue and I’m telling you through experience that experience is all there is. No point or coordinate…. Die and then comeback and tell me about how it was… until then enjoy arguing your points. I don’t have to argue shit. Your “why at all question” is a contemplation to verify whether or not there is meaning… no meaning the experience is the meaning. Enjoy your hunt for an answer. You won’t get it until you have experienced non experience… good luck