Merry christmas all! here is my christmas gift to you: a story i began working on last night to compliment a science fictionesque theory i whipped up a couple days ago. This is just the basic idea of my physics-philosophy in mythological form, with the theory I am working on following the story. Not the greatest Christmas gift, I know, but what better gift can I give than the gift of my creative mind?
“Genius lies not in observation of the observable, but in creation out that which can be observed. In the unobservable lies true genius - the imagination.”
This is a theory I pulled straight out of thin air when I read that Einstein wanted to refute the idea of a BIg Bang, stating that the singularity occured posterior to a prior state of contraction. I have not done much research in physics, so this is fit more for a science fiction novel I guess, maybe I can develop it into a myth story or a fable or something. Oh well, here it is. I began writing this last night:
Premise: Story of the origin of the universe
Once upon a “time,” the One became so compact, so dense, that space was no longer sufficient to force matter into an infinite regression of density, that the matter exploded into an ever expanding universe. The One thus created Being in its overcoming of the force of Nothing and then, there was something. The universe evolved into stars, planets, quasars, etc. each constituted by tiny particles called atoms, which were explored by the evolutionary result of life into man. Man explored the infinitely expansive and the infinitely minute and observed entities as present-at-hand to figure out how they became ready-to-hand. Man enquired into the most minute entities in the universe, and after finding the atom was divisible, he cried aloud: “Is all matter infinitely divisible?!? What are we to make of this?” Thus cried man, and he enquired into the ways of the universe, continued to explain its workings, but could not explain the “Why?” or “Whereto?”

"It just is," he replied without thinking of the One. “All is the way it is,” he exclaimed. “There is no whereto” he exclaimed. “All is expanding” he declared. 

Laws and theories were thus invented to explain all the relationships, all the intricacies of matter, and it made sense; but still the One was neglected and they thought he arose out of the Nothing, when really it was the One who overcame the Nothing.

 Thus the One remained perpetually creating and destroying at stabilized equilibrium. Nothing was the perpetual causi of the One and the One was the causi of the All. The Nothing continued to shout into the One while the One continued to shout into the All.
The Nothing continued to exert pressure on the extremely dense One Source-Singularity and thus continued to create Everything. The Nothing, in its pressure, was filtered through it in One’s time capsule and flowed into the inverse One, which was not Nothing itself, but what Nothing had created itself by what One could not create. The inverse of the One thus flowed parallel to the All. The One could not have been and remain to be if it were not for its inverse. Thus, it continued to create and destroy at equilibrium, which remained stabilized by the uniform force of the Nothing, which was absolute zero, yet the greatest force existent.

Thus, life was created by the One and man discovered consciousness of the physical universe and of himself. 

“What is this consciousness?” man enquired. “How do we know the Being is and beings are?” they asked. They asserted that this consciousness was nothingness itself, but yet they did not know that nothingness was related to this consciousness in its relationship to the All.

The relationship was analagous.

Man’s consciousness exerted force upon the One and thus the All was made intelligible, was employed and made ready-to-hand, while the One continued to create the All for man. But it was up to man what he was to create with what the One gave him, so he could know the ways of the One and understand the “Why,” but he could never understand the “Whereto” because man had created time, which the One never created. One was timeless, yet they could not comprehend eternity, but they could deduce infinite expansion based on theoretical speculations - this was man’s fault.

One was a flowing fountain. One would not still be One, the Singularity upon which the All is eternally created, if it were not for inverse One.

 Inverse One was the Nihilophysis. One would not be One if it were not for Physis and Nihilophysis.
 The Nihilophysical was non-existent the way we know existence, but it exists insofar as there is the One.
Narcissus sees Echo in the water, but reflection would not be possible without the One.

One is the light.
Without light man is merely Physis, but Physis is empty without the One.
Man says Nihilophysis is empty, yet he knows not that it is Nihilophysis that makes Physis whole.

<---------Whole is One--------->
--------->One is whole<---------
Here is the premise of the story:
Premise = Story of the origin of the universe:
The Big Bang took place upon the prior state of contraction into a supposed singularity upon which the universe, in an extremely dense bundle of matter exploded and expanded into a model, which resembles a flowing fountain, in which the universe is considered infinite only in the sense that in its curved limits, time would begin to flow backwards once it has reached the equator and begun its contracting phase again – but time would be an illusion. All events in time would occur simultaneously. All absolutes would only be absolute in the sense of its relativity to the perpetual created energy at the singularity, which still exists if time does not exist. It is only the relativity to the singularity in perpetual creation/destruction that makes any absolute absolute. If there is One source upon which all things are relative, then all relativity to other bodies would revert back to an absolute singularity, making them a potentiality for absolute Being.
Black holes? Black holes would be the vessel upon which matter would reach the “outside†of the fountain model and fall back into the centered singularity, the singularity upon which matter is uniformly being created and destroyed to be stabilized in an equilibrium. It would be more of a time vessel upon which matter does not fall into nothing, but travels to the singularity in which it is spewed back into the parallel universe where time would seemingly flow backwards.
The expanding universe? The inside structure upon which the fountain model would be that of two expanding ripples of which a spherical cone would be the exterior structure. Imagine a rock being thrown in a lake. The ripples expand from both the perspective outisde the river and from inside the river looking up. This is the basic model, with curved lines reaching outwards towards the equator, which is in line with One singularity (the absolute point at which the rock hits the water). A straight line reaching upwards would be the absolute point in the inside of the cone, the center of symmetry in the cone, with the apex being that which the curved lines, delineating the demarcation of the inside of the universe model, emanate from to give it its structure. The curved lines delineating the structure would continue to expand as the ripple would expand in circumfrence. The relationship is directly proportional, while space-time would be inversely proportional - that is, motion would begin to slow down as space expands.
The force of the Nothing would be propelled through the inside of the cone, causing the One to create the All - the inside of the expanding delineated fountain.
The Nothing is a paradox if you think about in terms of force, but to resolve this paradox, you would have to think of the infinitely minute as equal to the infinitely expansive - that is, the force of the nothing, if it is absolute zero, is the greatest force if absolute zero is the absolute point of the infintely minute.
As a metaphor in human life, take Freud’s idea of sublimation. Forced by anxiety, a human being is compelled to sublimate and either work or create. Forced by the Nothing, One is compelled to eternally create the All, which expands its limits, pushes against the infinite Nothing.
All time would be an illusion - that is, simultaneous - if the One is eternally creating. That means there would be an infinite number of dimensions. There is only three dimensional space, but the fourth dimension of time is divisible into an infinite number of dimensions. Think of a digit with a repeating decimal point - 1.1313131313. This would be representative of specific dimension of the One’s creation as 4.0000000000 would also be. All these events occur simultaneously. There are an infinite number of these digits and therefore an infinte number of temporal dimensions,
Time travel, as Stephen Hawking exclaims, would not allow us to travel to different temporal dimensions, but only to the inverse One - that is, the NIhilophysical. All laws of physics in the Nihilophysical would then be the exact opposite as they exist in the world of Physis, or the All. This is why we haven’t seen a man from the future, but this is also why we are both Physis and Nihilophysis - time travel is self contradictory if all events are simultaneuos. Man is the manifestation of ‘time travel’ into the Nihilophysical. It is the simultaneity of soul and body. The fourth dimension of time, here, exists independently of space. So don’t get caught up with the notion of space-time here, because relativity is debunked if there is absolute One, because all relativity would not be relativity if it were relative to an absolute, because it would have the potentiality for absolute Being if it could know the absolute One. Ã…st. Only the speed of light is absolute with regard to space-time, which is the metaphorical representation of the manifestation of One - all else is apparently relative; but the expanding fountain model would compliment both the expanding universe and curved space-time, with universal gravitation being the glue of that which holds all bodies together, the expansion being that which pulls them apart.
Time would never reach the point of absolute rest in this theory - as it is in inverse proportion to the expasion of space - because there is no physical representation of absolute rest, so it would have to be purely conceptual - that is, the point at which the infinitely minute meets with the infinitely expansive in synthesis. This synthesis would be reconcilitaion with the One, or with Åst. This is the highest potentiality for energy known as absolute Oreindfauthi, which is Åst itself. Åst is the abstract representation of the Øne.
Well, now I am beginning to make my philosophy a little more theortical, plausible with scientific theory. Who knows where this will go.
Again, I haven’t done that much research in physics, so I don’t know what is original here and what errors there are, but it’s fun just to think about. Maybe I’ll write a science fiction book or something.
Anyway, Merry Christmas!