Now proved and in the open, looks like Intelligence agencies are preparing to throw the political-left under the bus… interesting turn of events…
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQNl8PpcSHw[/youtube]
Now proved and in the open, looks like Intelligence agencies are preparing to throw the political-left under the bus… interesting turn of events…
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQNl8PpcSHw[/youtube]
I gotta ask, have you ever posted anything, ANYTHING, that wasn’t already
put on Faux News? Your every post seems to mirror every single report on
Faux News…I would say you have an completely empty mind and you need
faux news to fill it with, something, anything…
I heard a description of William Jennings Bryant, that fits you to a T.
if he ever had a thought, it would die of loneliness in the empty desert
of his mind…
fits you to a T.
Kropotkin
Truth is invisible in the black light of hate.
K: Ok, so no… every single post you make is simply something you
saw on Faux news… that’s good to know…as advertise… as we used to say in
liar’s dice…you have no intelligence and no imagination…hence
your reliance on faux news to tell you what to think…and what to be against…
if Faux news ever went out of business, you would never post again around here…
Kropotkin
Interesting self-reflection, PK, glad that you’re finally becoming self-conscious and making intellectual progress though. Keep up the good work!
why you still on this?? trump got voted out. his term is over. he didnt build the wall he just cut taxes for the rich. he lost by a landslide.
Stay on topic.
If you want to discuss Trump’s 2020 Presidential win, when you exclude illegal & false votes, then start a new thread.
This thread is about Obama and Clinton using the Federal government illegally.
K: Jeez, I hate dealing with 3 year old children.
Kropotkin
Geller Report[/url]"] Main Steele Dossier Researcher Arrested in Durham Probe
By Caroline Downer, WFB, November 4, 2021: The primary researcher behind the Steele Dossier, a collection of unsubstantiated opposition research linking the 2016 Trump campaign to the Kremlin, was arrested by federal authorities Thursday. Russia analyst Igor Danchenko’s indictment stems from the federal probe led by John Durham, the special counsel tapped by the Trump administration to audit the Russia investigation for malfeasan In the months following the 2016 election, it was determined that many of the claims made by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, who hired Danchenko, were either unverified or erroneous. The dossier created the collusion allegation that Trump “accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals.” Steele was later accused of peddling a hoax of Russian election interference to undermine Trump’s campaign with his dossier, which was funded by the Clinton campaign through its law firm Perkins Coie. Perkins Coie employed Clinton campaign lawyer and former federal prosecutor Michael Sussmann, who Durham also recently charged for allegedly making a false statement to the FBI concerning the Trump Organization’s use of a secret server to communicate with Kremlin-connected Russian bank Alfa Bank. ce, anonymous individuals with direct knowledge of the matter told the New York Times. In February, Durham issued a subpoena to collect documents associated with Danchenko’s former employment at the Brookings Institution, where he worked for five years. During this tenure, he faced a counterintelligence inquiry into whether he was a Russian agent. Danchenko rejected this idea in an interview with Times in 2020. “I’ve never been a Russian agent,” he said. “It is ridiculous to suggest that. This, I think, it’s slander.” During an interview with the FBI, Danchenko cast doubt on some of the contents of the dossier, suggesting that he himself was skeptical of the material presented. “Even raw intelligence from credible sources, I take it with a grain of salt,” Danchenko said. “Who knows, what if it’s not particularly accurate? Is it just a rumor or is there more to it?” However, the FBI reportedly did not relay Danchenko’s doubt to the Justice Department. A 2019 investigation conducted by the DOJ inspector general called out the FBI for relying on information from the dossier in spite of Danchenko’s admission that some of the details were somewhat speculative.
New York Post[/url]"]Inside the Clinton dossier and the con behind the Russiagate scandal
The nation argued for five years over the infamous Steele dossier, the document on which the FBI relied to investigate Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign. It should have been called the Clinton dossier.
Special counsel John Durham this week obtained an indictment of Igor Danchenko, a Russian who provided information for the dossier. Danchenko is charged with lying to the FBI, but the bigger story of the indictment is Democrats’ central role in every aspect of the dossier and the FBI investigation.
Never forget the original claim. According to the FBI, Democrats and the media, Trump harbored secret and nefarious ties with Russia. We knew that because — as Mother Jones explained in a 2016 article that became the reigning storyline — Christopher Steele was a “credible source with a proven record of providing reliable, sensitive and important information to the US government.” He had come across “troubling” evidence of Trump collusion and brought it to US law enforcement.
It took a year for congressional investigators to reveal the dossier had in fact been commissioned by the opposition-research firm Fusion GPS, working for the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign. It took two more years for Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz to expose that Steele had relied on a Russian source who said he had never expected Steele to present his info as facts, since most of it was “hearsay.”
Two more years on, Durham’s indictment says this source — Danchenko — obtained material from a longtime Democratic operative who was active in the 2016 Clinton campaign. Clintonites here, Clintonites there, Trump “scandals” everywhere.
The revelation shouldn’t surprise us, given that Danchenko was never some high-level Russian in Moscow. From 2005 through 2010, he worked at the Washington-based Brookings Institution, a center-left think tank. Around the end of that employment, the indictment asserts, he was introduced to “PR Executive-1,” a Clinton crony who The New York Times confirmed is Charles Dolan.
Christopher Steele’s primary source is Igor Danchenko, a Russian citizen who had worked for the Brookings Institution think tank. Danchenko collected info from what he would at first claim was a “network of subsources” in Russia.
APDolan has long been in Clinton circles, having served seven years as head of the Democratic Governors Association and state chairman of Bill Clinton’s 1992 and 1996 presidential campaigns. President Clinton appointed him to a State Department advisory commission, and the indictment notes he was an active “volunteer” on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign. He also had far more ties to Russians than anyone in Trump’s circle, having for eight years helped handle “global public relations for the Russian government” and throughout 2016 interacted frequently with senior Russian officials and Russian Embassy staff.
The indictment reveals that in August 2016, Danchenko asked Dolan for any “thought, rumor, allegation” regarding the summer’s resignation of Paul Manafort as Trump’s campaign manager. Danchenko explained he was working on a “project against Trump.”
Dolan replied that he’d had a drink with a “GOP friend of mine who knows some of the players” and provided gossip. Sentences of this e-mail appear nearly verbatim in the Steele dossier, though they are (hilariously) sourced to a “close associate of TRUMP.” To add farce to fantasy, the indictment says the Dolan later told the FBI he had fabricated meeting a GOP friend and had simply passed on info he had read in the press.
The indictment flags meetings, e-mails and calls that suggests Dolan passed plenty of other information to Danchenko for the dossier. This includes information he might have obtained during visits to the Russian Embassy in Washington. (Did the Russians know where this was going?)
Former President Donald TrumpThen Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump still won the 2016 presidential election in spite of Hillary Clinton’s dirty tricks with the Russians.Getty ImagesDolan was also in regular communication with Olga Galkina, another Russian who fed information to Danchenko for the dossier. Galkina noted in two separate e-mails that she was expecting Dolan to get her a State Department job in a Hillary Clinton administration.
The indictment alleges Danchenko lied about Dolan’s interaction with the dossier when the bureau belatedly tried to check the dossier’s accuracy. The indictment says all this deprived the FBI of the ability to learn about the “reliability, motivations and potential bias” of the Democratic source. True, though this latest indictment again paints the FBI as either inept or biased.
According to the charges, Dolan told the FBI that the Clinton campaign didn’t direct him and wasn’t aware of his dealings with Danchenko and that he didn’t know his info would land at the FBI. Maybe, though the indictment notes that one Dolan e-mail in early 2017 expressed knowledge that Danchenko had supplied information to the dossier now in the news.
The Clinton dossier should go down as one of the biggest scandals in US political history. Not just for the breadth of the con, but for the time it has taken to expose it.
Lie, Cheat and Steele
Hillary Clinton’s campaign paid law firm Perkins Coie for various services, including opposition research. Perkins Coie hires Fusion GPS, “a strategic intelligence firm,” which pays former British spy Christopher Steele to look into Donald Trump.
Steele’s primary source is Igor Danchenko, a Russian citizen who had worked for the Brookings Institution think tank. Danchenko collected info from what he would at first claim was a “network of subsources” in Russia. He later revealed that he just asked people for gossip — or fabricated information. In 2017, he admitted to agents that it was “rumor and speculation.”
One of Danchenko’s sources was Charles Dolan, a p.r. exec who had worked on campaigns for Bill and Hillary Clinton. Dolan relayed to Danchenko gossip that he claimed to have gotten from “a GOP friend of mine who knows some of the players.” The gossip ended up the dossier. Dolan admitted later that he made up the GOP friend.
Another source was Olga Galkina, a Russian p.r. exec who thought she had been promised a job in the State Department if Hillary Clinton were to win the presidency. Fired from Webzilla, Galkina falsely implicated the Web-services company in the hacking of DNC e-mails and also seemingly invented a story about Michael Cohen visiting Prague (a claim debunked by the Mueller report).
Danchenko also had a made-up source. He claimed the president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce had revealed to him a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between Trump and the Kremlin. Later pressed on the purported exchange, Danchenko said he “thought” he was “probably” talking to the chamber president. Danchenko has been arrested on charges for repeatedly lying to investigators that this happened.
Danchenko delivers this collection of lies, rumors and inventions to Christopher Steele, who credits it as intelligence from “high-level Russian officials” and “close associates of Trump” — none of whom exist. Steele shops the dossier to the media and FBI, hoping to spark a public investigation of Trump.
The dossier gets passed around Washington (John McCain gives a copy to the FBI) and fuels speculation in the media that Trump is part of a Russian conspiracy. FBI Agent Peter Strzok interviews Danchenko and Steele and finds them unconvincing, but the investigation continues. BuzzFeed publishes the dossier in full, but admits nothing in it can be verified.
As a related sideline, the case of Dr’s Jonathan Tobey can be interesting , to point to a more comprehensive and encompassing major political conflict.
That the motive for selling out the US has not yet
been established, things are beggining to trickle through the grapewine.
Money can’t be the sole object, because they were making in excess of 200,000 dollars a year.
An idea that some analysts suggested was a remark that the wife made during the attack on Congress by Trumpian fans, that she , along with her husband hated Trump with a passion.
They lived practically on the event’s doorstep, (Annapolis) enjoying way over upper class benefits.
He could have made money, for sure, but it was an emotional retribution which was basically the tour de’force.
On account of the heightened political tension of that time, can understanding not but befuddle such emotional outburst, among the partisan elite?
Just thought that the current ran deeper then the Steel Dossier points to, and that this case is examplary of the disconnect perpetuated by the intelligence agencies.
Media do not really help matters much , and maybe mass confusion does have some remote benefits.
The husband was a decorated naval officer, and his conversation with the buyer(s) seemed to indicate a support of the agenda contrary to his country’s interest.
Some speculate the buyer of the intelligence to be Russia or China, since it consisted in acquiring basic tech. info into the latest stealth nuclear sub that exists in the US arsenal.
"[url=https://gellerreport.com/2021/11/russiagate-arrest-durham-arrests-clinton-dossier-operative.html/:Geller Report[/url]"] Main Steele Dossier Researcher Arrested in Durham Probe
By Caroline Downer, WFB, November 4, 2021: The primary researcher behind the Steele Dossier, a collection of unsubstantiated opposition research linking the 2016 Trump campaign to the Kremlin, was arrested by federal authorities Thursday. Russia analyst Igor Danchenko’s indictment stems from the federal probe led by John Durham, the special counsel tapped by the Trump administration to audit the Russia investigation for malfeasan In the months following the 2016 election, it was determined that many of the claims made by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, who hired Danchenko, were either unverified or erroneous. The dossier created the collusion allegation that Trump “accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals.” Steele was later accused of peddling a hoax of Russian election interference to undermine Trump’s campaign with his dossier, which was funded by the Clinton campaign through its law firm Perkins Coie. Perkins Coie employed Clinton campaign lawyer and former federal prosecutor Michael Sussmann, who Durham also recently charged for allegedly making a false statement to the FBI concerning the Trump Organization’s use of a secret server to communicate with Kremlin-connected Russian bank Alfa Bank. ce, anonymous individuals with direct knowledge of the matter told the New York Times. In February, Durham issued a subpoena to collect documents associated with Danchenko’s former employment at the Brookings Institution, where he worked for five years. During this tenure, he faced a counterintelligence inquiry into whether he was a Russian agent. Danchenko rejected this idea in an interview with Times in 2020. “I’ve never been a Russian agent,” he said. “It is ridiculous to suggest that. This, I think, it’s slander.” During an interview with the FBI, Danchenko cast doubt on some of the contents of the dossier, suggesting that he himself was skeptical of the material presented. “Even raw intelligence from credible sources, I take it with a grain of salt,” Danchenko said. “Who knows, what if it’s not particularly accurate? Is it just a rumor or is there more to it?” However, the FBI reportedly did not relay Danchenko’s doubt to the Justice Department. A 2019 investigation conducted by the DOJ inspector general called out the FBI for relying on information from the dossier in spite of Danchenko’s admission that some of the details were somewhat speculative.
K: ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the ILP version of Hiroo Onoda…
Kropotkin
K: ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the ILP version of Hiroo Onoda…
Kropotkin
And I give you The Wall Street Journal -
Wall Street Journal:Lie, Cheat and Steele
Hillary Clinton’s campaign paid law firm Perkins Coie for various services, including opposition research. Perkins Coie hires Fusion GPS, “a strategic intelligence firm,” which pays former British spy Christopher Steele to look into Donald Trump.
Steele’s primary source is Igor Danchenko, a Russian citizen who had worked for the Brookings Institution think tank. Danchenko collected info from what he would at first claim was a “network of subsources” in Russia. He later revealed that he just asked people for gossip — or fabricated information. In 2017, he admitted to agents that it was “rumor and speculation.”
One of Danchenko’s sources was Charles Dolan, a p.r. exec who had worked on campaigns for Bill and Hillary Clinton. Dolan relayed to Danchenko gossip that he claimed to have gotten from “a GOP friend of mine who knows some of the players.” The gossip ended up the dossier. Dolan admitted later that he made up the GOP friend.
Another source was Olga Galkina, a Russian p.r. exec who thought she had been promised a job in the State Department if Hillary Clinton were to win the presidency. Fired from Webzilla, Galkina falsely implicated the Web-services company in the hacking of DNC e-mails and also seemingly invented a story about Michael Cohen visiting Prague (a claim debunked by the Mueller report).
Danchenko also had a made-up source. He claimed the president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce had revealed to him a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between Trump and the Kremlin. Later pressed on the purported exchange, Danchenko said he “thought” he was “probably” talking to the chamber president. Danchenko has been arrested on charges for repeatedly lying to investigators that this happened.
Danchenko delivers this collection of lies, rumors and inventions to Christopher Steele, who credits it as intelligence from “high-level Russian officials” and “close associates of Trump” — none of whom exist. Steele shops the dossier to the media and FBI, hoping to spark a public investigation of Trump.
The dossier gets passed around Washington (John McCain gives a copy to the FBI) and fuels speculation in the media that Trump is part of a Russian conspiracy. FBI Agent Peter Strzok interviews Danchenko and Steele and finds them unconvincing, but the investigation continues. BuzzFeed publishes the dossier in full, but admits nothing in it can be verified.
Stay on topic.
If you want to discuss Trump’s 2020 Presidential win, when you exclude illegal & false votes, then start a new thread.
This thread is about Obama and Clinton using the Federal government illegally.
but he lost tho
Removing illegal and fraud from 2020, Trump won by a landslide. Trump third-term incoming 2024.
yeah they looked over all that. youre wrong. he lost. bigly.
Arizona Audit proved Marxist defrauded the election, over 50,000 fraudulent votes.
Arizona Audit proved Marxist defrauded the election, over 50,000 fraudulent votes.
K: actually, the Audit showed the Biden won by more votes then previously thought…
but we know you don’t care about the truth or reality… so hold on to your
fantasies how IQ45 won the last election… it ain’t true…
so give us your proof, your evidence that the election was stolen by “50,000” votes…
whereas I can easily give proof that biden won the last election… without lying,
unlike you who needs to lie about the election results…
Kropotkin
it wasn’t the steele dossier that started the mueller probe. it was george papadopoulos getting drunk and self snitching to an australian diplomat who then alerted the fbi.
rwnj media doesn’t want to deal with that because it’s not so easy to dismiss it all when a dude straight up snitches on himself.
it wasn’t the steele dossier that started the mueller probe. it was george papadopoulos getting drunk and self snitching to an australian diplomat who then alerted the fbi.
rwnj media doesn’t want to deal with that because it’s not so easy to dismiss it all when a dude straight up snitches on himself.
Fake News -
The US CIA told the FBI that Mr Papadopoulos was working for them. An FBI staffer then changed that memo to read the opposite - that Mr Papadopoulos did NOT work for them. The staffer was eventually arrested and convicted (long after the damage was done - of course).