Cognitive dissonance over Godel

Philosophy Forums Science, Technology, and Math
1

Colin leslie dean throws you all into Cognitive dissonance over Godel

dean does not say AR or Self referencing statements are invalid

he only throws your own experts down your throat
ie ramsey wittgensttien russull text books on logic -who say these things are invalid
thus he uses YOUR logic to show YOUR views are invalid

you see that is the quandary you u are really in
your need to believe the expert godel but you also need to believe the experts ie ramsey wittgensttien russull text books on logic but they contradict each other ie one bunch of experts say another expert used invalid principles- in any other case YOU would say that was enough to invalid the claims
so you have cognitive dissonance you dont know what to do so you attack the weak link ie dean as he is safe by not being a nobody

dean plays with your mind by piting one bunch of you experts against another
you cant say the experts are wrong but you cant say they are right either
as either way you get an unacceptable conclusion
ie godel is invalid or wittgensttien russull text books on logic are invalid - YOU CANT ACCEPT EITHER CONCLUSON thus

YOU GO INTO MELT DOWN WITH YOUR MIND BEING PLAYED BY DEAN

2

Do you ever have anything positive to say, or anything contributive, LadyJane?

There is no quandary to speak of: apart from the one in your head!

3

Okey dokey…like I said, math is man-made and has flaws…so does ‘logic’, Godel and Dean.

4

yes
godel is invalid
or cant you handle one of your gods ending up in the dust

5

gods??? You’re nuts…as in pecan.

6

I don’t even know who Godel is: so presuming without knowing, is invalid! :confused:

I don’t have any Gods, to have end up in the dust…