I just mean in the case that it were.
Like if a large swath of populace was very resistant to superstate government authority, including socialization of industry specially, and a way was found to compel obedience or observance that, for the moment, precluded the pursuit of racial purity in an open way?
Nature/Nurture definitions have ben established.
In Timocracy the ssytem is self-regualting.
Only creative, minds with specific demeanours will be able to humble themselves and understand and adapt to nature, in order to produce tangible goods.
Not abstractions, but tangible products, to maintain their citizenry.
Low IQ will not be able to earn nor maintain citizenship.
Actinos, not numbers.
My triad of importance
Blood (genetics) 70%
Training, Education, paideia (20%)
Will, Choice, Commitment (10%)
In a SuperState where ethnic and cultural sovereignty was permitted there would be no issue.
I don’t care what others choose to do.
The ‘what if’ is a matter of choice.
I would not impose a universal rule, as if I were a self-righteous, morally superior zealot.
Other systems can deal with their problems on their own. If some ethnicity wants to rebel against an authority, because it is being repressed, then they should fight, not I.
I’ve already stated my personal preference.
We are talking, for example, in the specific case of the EU.
Or the US, and specially in a case where it would bond US authority to EU interests.
Is the establishment of firm superstate authority and socialization of industry more strategically important than the pursuit of racial purity?
See how manipulative you are.
Do you want me to tell you i am for stringent authoritarianism to tell me you are a anarchist?
Environment necessitates and determines what is viable.
Now in some future time when and if man gains access to space, and can colonize other planets, then all sorts of new systems will be viable.
On this planet, presently, anarchy is for men-children to dream of.
And yes, ethnicity and preserving traditions, culture, is paramount.
Otherwise you get the US…which cannot endure if it faces challengers and impoverishment. It crumbles, if it is not wealthy, minimizing the effect of internal frictions.
The US was viable as long as it could maintain its wealth…when economy declines it begins to crumble because there’s nothing to hold it together, but the dream, and the idea.
No, we already established that you are for, but only for, the amount of authority required for a compromise socialist order.
And I already understood also that for you the end goal can only be one where racial purity is the first priority, at least for the part of the order you fit into, your own race and life.
The question is about strategic priority.
And if not your life, your line, your mark on this world if you will, the fate of humanity that you had a part in determining and also the fate of your line.
US is Americanism.Americanism is nihilistic.
Anti-any tangible, natural identifiers- anti family because the father challenges the central culture-of-no-culture; anti-cuture because it lacks culture so all cultures is an antithesis to its culture as a product one can purchase and then throw away and recycle.
It replaces salvation with the word “liberty”…Abrahamic to the core. It tolerates no other alternative - no gods will be worshiped - messianic. It pretends to be a victim, when it is the victimizer; it appeals to the worlds downtrodden, lost, desperate, the omegas of the world using money as a compensatory overcoming of inherited deficiencies; it claims moral superiority, manifest destiny, choseness, the indispensable nation; it has no racial, no cultural, no ethnic, identity at all - it is sampling from a variety of cultures recycling them, corrupting and selling them as products to be purchased if one has the money; money is tis messiah.and you earn god’s graces if you serve god’s will.
Right, but that doesn’t mean that whatever order is in place in the US isn’t of strategic significance for a racially pure order, even if it is someplace else. The EU, for example.
Priorities adjusted to this:
And the question still remains, whether the first priority, in real actual world strategic terms, is racial purity or the firm establishment of superstates and the socialization of industry.
The only dogma the Us is preserving is Judaism
This nihilistic variant.
Like I said…the US is an Empire of Lies.
Now it is forced to abide by its own principles. It was rightfully called out was practicing other than what it preached.
In the past it was claiming race was a social construct - as way to undermine other races - but practicing a racially based immigration policy. Now it is forced to practice what it preaches and this is destroying it, because tis lie is exposed and you cannot substitute Asian or European immigrants with Mestizos or Africans and maintain the same level of sophistication. Losing technological advantages over competitors.
You may get the outlier, but on average IQ and creativity will decline.
This is why Trump was elected. But he failed.
He had to pay those that got him elected…the Jews.
He paid lip service to whites…and will continue to do so.
His base.
Christianized whites - so Judaized.
Nevertheless…good enough.
Well, but you can have superstate authority and socialization of industry without racial purity, but you can’t have racial purity without superstate authprity and socialization of industry. No?
The first priority is survival and propagation.
Meme…culture.
Traditions.
Jews use hatred to maintain their ideological purity - their cohesion.
Ghettoization and victimization.
Gypsies do the same.
Gypsies practice the same strategy, only it is less sophisticated.
I mean, worship of the dollar is the means by which the US spreads its nihilism accross the world. This has to be curbed. No?
No.
What does the socialization of industry have to do with it?
Money is the seductive messiah offering liberation to the world’s genetically impoverished…seeking a compensation.
It overcomes all genetic unfitness…leading to degeneration and decadence.
Well I mean, you can hardly control the racial and traditional makeup of a nation, even one embedded within a superstate, if you don’t have control over the economy. Unless I am very wrong. ?