…not w/o an alignment of best practices not even the U.S. has under its belt yet (observe: all the increasing homeless). China smashes all the temples. Not a good look.
Lorikeet, tell me what you think about this:
The “rift” between national and international socialists, between fascists and communists, is a Jewish conspiracy to keep you all divided.
Communism is Jewish.
National socialism was antagonized by international socialism - Trotskyites - to undermine the world’s cultural, religious, familial traditions.
This is not conscious…the meme has its own programming, taking over the mind and compelling it to think and judge according to its standards and its interests.
Similar to DNA…the organism need not be aware why it feels the impulse to act in a certain way.
Ideology shapes the mind’s understanding.
Zombification.
The original communists were nationalists, fighting against foreign interests. Then internationalists gradually took over - opportunists - pitting brother against brother, based on class conflicts.
An Italian communist identified with a Spanish communist more than he did with a wealthy Italian.
I place Marxism among secular nihilism’s variants…an evolution of Marxism.
Parasites evovle…so do memetic parasites.
and so, the confusion between Semites and Jews…still being exploited.
But, being real, pure nationalism is no longer possible, like you stated. Superstates are needed.
All else comes apart eventually. The kingdom of heaven is ruled from within.
Ethnos.
Nationalism negates ethnicity, replacing it with an abstraction.
So, you identify with Valenzuela, when it is not an ethnicity.
Or Canada, or America, or Australia.
Ethnicity has the component of genetics - race.
Ok, but other than ethnicity, everything else you see in the socialist camp is pretty much legit, no? Or if it isn’t, but it leads to, say, a strong united EU, might be worth it? You know, other than racial purity?
Or like if something is not 100% what you want but it leads to people putting more trust and relliance on the government which will be charged with instituting proper ethnic socialism?
The science doesn’t support your position [unless it is right that we’re all at least a tad mestizo…which has no meaning unless race is genetic…unless by mestizo you mean genetics that got concentrated within a population eventually … diluted … back to original?… or back to something as inessential (changing, adaptable) as race…hence a conscious AI should be considered a full person regardless its DNA or lack of DNA…we’re all AI except the Original] (but anywhayz…irreducibly complex…intended from the get go), but if you’re just playing a role, you already know that.
Socialism determines how much the state will intervene and regulate.
All systems have it.
The ideal state is Timocracy.
Given world circumstances some compromises must be made.
Yeah, but this is what I mean. Given those compromises.
God is the only real owner, and only ground of love & glory, so I will accept a timocracy if all in office are in alignment with the Original.
Mestizo - native American + European + African sub-Saharan negro.
Race determines trait potentials = nature
Nurture determines how much of these potentials we cultivate.
Miscegenation dilutes potentials, lowering them to a median.
Since a complete return is impossible, we must preserve what is left.
Memes (culture) is gene (race) specific.and it mutates when transmitted to other races/ethnicities.
Culture represents a specific population’s relationship with a specific environment, inherited as tradition, as history, as art.
Language i the mode of transmission.
Linguistic family trees are memetic maps of a genetic past - historical and prehistorical.
Ideological DNA.
Citizenry was earned and maintained, and privileges came with duties.
Let me try to put it more plainly.
Right now, as things stand, is racial purity more important than the firm establishment of strong, superstate governments?
And also the socialization of industry?
It would be interesting to see MBTI personality & skill stats between cultural identities.
But, would those stats change as the individuals move between cultures? Would the stats change as the culture changes geographic locations?
Would any of that be a reason to tell someone they cannot (or must) do X because they don’t fall under the right stats?
Do stats really matter if “Where there’s a will, eff the stats”?
Why is it one or the other?
superstates will have competing models…Americanism will maintain its Melting Pot miscegenating model - eventually ensuring tis collapse - another may practice a more stringent form of the caste system - India - returning to tis traditions - another may adopt a social credit system - China, where ethnicities are still maintained - another like Eurasia, may practice a loose federated ethno-state model, something like Swiss cantons, with shared external affairs, currency and defence.
Do you mean that if you’re shown trustworthy with a little you’re going to be trusted with more? You mean those with more have more expected of them? Sounds biblical.